Trophallergen Prick Tests (PT) : Influence of Food Sample Shelf Life on the Reproducibility of PT Results
TROPHAPRICK
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prick tests (PT) are the standard skin tests used in the investigation of immediate IgE-mediated food allergies. Their use as a first-line tool in allergological investigations is strongly recommended by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI). These tests involve locally reproducing histamine release manifestations in the epidermis by superficially introducing an allergen to confirm or rule out its role in the onset of clinical symptoms compatible with an allergy. During the diagnostic management and follow-up of patients with food allergies, the technique used is the "prick to prick" method, due to the lack of reliable access to many standardized commercial food extracts. This method involves piercing the food with a sterile lancet (to deposit food content on its surface) and then making a superficial skin puncture with the same device on the anterior surface of the forearm to introduce a tiny fraction of the food and its proteins into the epidermis, where mast cells are present. Simultaneously, a positive control and a negative control are performed. The tests are read after 15 to 20 minutes by measuring the size in millimeters of the resulting papules and erythema. A PT for the tested allergen is considered positive if the average diameter of the resulting papule is 3 mm or more and/or at least half the size of the positive control papule. The procedure is well-tolerated, allowing it to be performed at any age, in both hospital and outpatient settings. The risk of a systemic reaction has been evaluated at 0.008%, with no severe reactions observed. This method, performed with native foods (unprocessed food, uncontaminated foods), either raw or cooked (depending on the nature of the allergen being tested), is preferred over the use of commercial extracts (standardized commercial allergen preparations) due to its better sensitivity and specificity, the high cost of commercial extracts, and the lack of commercial extracts for certain foods. For practical reasons, given the wide variety of possible allergens, and to most accurately reproduce the exposure that caused the reaction, the most common approach is to ask the patient to bring their own foods for testing. These foods should be brought in a fresh state. However, situations where the patient is offered a food PT but does not have fresh native foods are common. Indeed, many patients forget to bring them. Similarly, during a consultation to explore a respiratory or drug allergy, the interview may lead to the detection of a food allergy that needs to be tested at the same time. Given the delays in allergology consultations, the severity of food allergy symptoms, and the potential risk of delayed diagnosis, all allergists involved in managing food allergies are led to create a library of food samples stored either in a dry state (e.g., nuts, peanuts, cereal flours) or frozen for perishable foods (meats, shellfish, fruits, vegetables). To our knowledge, after reviewing the literature, no guidelines for best practices regarding the storage of these food samples for PT purposes have been established by scientific societies. Moreover, while the impact of freezing and thawing methods on the denaturation of food proteins is known, the effect of freezing and its duration on the sensitivity and specificity of PT is poorly understood. The objective of our study is to evaluate the reproducibility of PT results between those performed with fresh foods and those performed with preserved foods at different storage dates in participants who have experienced anaphylaxis of at least grade 2 according to the Ring and Messmer classification.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2027
December 30, 2025
December 1, 2025
2.5 years
March 7, 2025
December 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Average diameter (mm) of the resulting papules obtained from PT performed with fresh foods, with preserved foods at different storage durations and with positives and negatives controls.
Average diameter of the papule : average between the smallest diameter and the largest diameter of the papule. Test interpretable if the average diameter of the positive histamine control papule is 3 mm or more and if the average diameter of the negative saline control papule is less than 3 mm. Test considered positive if the average diameter of the papule obtained with the allergen is 3 mm or more and/or half or more of the size of the positive control papule. Test considered negative if the average diameter of the papule obtained with the allergen is less than 3 mm.
The tests are read 15 to 20 minutes after the food is pricked onto the participants' skin
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The Histamine Equivalent Prick index diameter (HEP-index diameter) calculated during PT performed with fresh foods and foods stored for different durations
The tests are read 15 to 20 minutes after the food is pricked onto the participants' skin.
Study Arms (1)
Food allergies arm
EXPERIMENTALThe participants are their own control. Performing all tests in a single session avoid analysis biases related to intra-individual variability in reactivity encountered during prick-tests performed on various dates (patient included only once in the study, no possible re-inclusion).
Interventions
Several foods may be tested for the same participant depending on the number of food allergies the patient has. PT are performed using the "prick-to-prick" method with lancets, in a single session per patient, using fresh and preserved native foods. Simultaneously, a positive control and a negative control are performed. The PT are performed and read by nursing or medical staff trained in the technique. Participants' clinical follow-up is performed continuously for 30 minutes from the performance of the prick-tests and under the responsibility of the allergologist doctor, whose presence is mandatory during the performance of these tests. For meat, fruit, vegetable, leguminous plant, milk, seafood and fish tests will be performed with fresh products and with products preserved for 3 months as well as with products preserved for 6 months \[-15 days; +15 days\]. For dry foods (nuts and peanuts), tests will be performed with products harvested over 3 separate and consecutive seasons.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 and over.
- Having a diagnosis of food allergy(ies) due to one or more of the food allergen studied, previously made by an allergologist, of grade 2 to 3 according to the Ring and Messmer classification.
- Having given consent to participate in the study.
- The diagnosis is made by the allergologist of the department due to the presence of a compatible clinical history implicating the tested allergen, the presence of evidence of sensitization to the allergen (positive prick-test and/or positive specific IgE assays), or even a positive oral allergen reintroduction test.
You may not qualify if:
- Anaphylactic reaction dating less than 6 weeks
- Hospitalization for asthma in the past 3 months
- History of grade 4 anaphylactic reaction according to the Ring and Messmer classification.
- Systemic antihistamine treatment in the 7 days preceding the test
- Systemic beta-blocker treatment on the day of the test.
- Protected person (under guardianship or curatorship)
- Person under judicial supervision
- Persons deprived of liberty
- Person not affiliated with a social security insurance
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans
Orléans, 45067, France
Related Publications (17)
Santos AF, Riggioni C, Agache I, Akdis CA, Akdis M, Alvarez-Perea A, Alvaro-Lozano M, Ballmer-Weber B, Barni S, Beyer K, Bindslev-Jensen C, Brough HA, Buyuktiryaki B, Chu D, Del Giacco S, Dunn-Galvin A, Eberlein B, Ebisawa M, Eigenmann P, Eiwegger T, Feeney M, Fernandez-Rivas M, Fisher HR, Fleischer DM, Giovannini M, Gray C, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Halken S, Hourihane JO, Jones CJ, Jutel M, Knol E, Konstantinou GN, Lack G, Lau S, Marques Mejias A, Marchisotto MJ, Meyer R, Mortz CG, Moya B, Muraro A, Nilsson C, Lopes de Oliveira LC, O'Mahony L, Papadopoulos NG, Perrett K, Peters RL, Podesta M, Poulsen LK, Roberts G, Sampson HA, Schwarze J, Smith P, Tham EH, Untersmayr E, Van Ree R, Venter C, Vickery BP, Vlieg-Boerstra B, Werfel T, Worm M, Du Toit G, Skypala I. EAACI guidelines on the diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy. Allergy. 2023 Dec;78(12):3057-3076. doi: 10.1111/all.15902. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
PMID: 37815205BACKGROUNDRiggioni C, Ricci C, Moya B, Wong D, van Goor E, Bartha I, Buyuktiryaki B, Giovannini M, Jayasinghe S, Jaumdally H, Marques-Mejias A, Piletta-Zanin A, Berbenyuk A, Andreeva M, Levina D, Iakovleva E, Roberts G, Chu D, Peters R, du Toit G, Skypala I, Santos AF. Systematic review and meta-analyses on the accuracy of diagnostic tests for IgE-mediated food allergy. Allergy. 2024 Feb;79(2):324-352. doi: 10.1111/all.15939. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
PMID: 38009299BACKGROUNDHenzgen M, Ballmer-Weber BK, Erdmann S, Fuchs T, Kleine-Tebbe J, Lepp U, Niggemann B, Raithel M, Reese I, Saloga J, Vieths S, Zuberbier T, Werfel T; German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI); Physicians' Association of German Allergologists (ADA); Society of Pediatric Allergology (GPA); Swiss Society of Allergology. Skin testing with food allergens. Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Physicians' Association of German Allergologists (ADA) and the Society of Pediatric Allergology (GPA) together with the Swiss Society of Allergology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008 Nov;6(11):983-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2008.06889.x. English, German.
PMID: 18992038BACKGROUNDRance F, Juchet A, Bremont F, Dutau G. Correlations between skin prick tests using commercial extracts and fresh foods, specific IgE, and food challenges. Allergy. 1997 Oct;52(10):1031-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb02427.x.
PMID: 9360758BACKGROUNDBrockow K, Romano A, Blanca M, Ring J, Pichler W, Demoly P. General considerations for skin test procedures in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy. 2002 Jan;57(1):45-51. No abstract available.
PMID: 11991289BACKGROUNDRuethers T, Johnston EB, Karnaneedi S, Nie S, Nugraha R, Taki AC, Kamath SD, Williamson NA, Mehr SS, Campbell DE, Lopata AL. Commercial shellfish skin prick test extracts show critical variability in allergen repertoire. Allergy. 2023 Dec;78(12):3261-3265. doi: 10.1111/all.15853. Epub 2023 Aug 21. No abstract available.
PMID: 37602511BACKGROUNDPatti ML, De Rose C, Brancato F, Gambacorta A, Miceli Sopo S. Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy. Acta Biomed. 2021 Apr 30;92(S1):e2021067. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS1.10043.
PMID: 33944826BACKGROUNDCodreanu F, Moneret-Vautrin DA, Morisset M, Guenard L, Rance F, Kanny G, Lemerdy P. The risk of systemic reactions to skin prick-tests using food allergens: CICBAA data and literature review. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Feb;38(2):52-4.
PMID: 16711536BACKGROUNDLee S, Jo K, Jeong HG, Choi YS, Kyoung H, Jung S. Freezing-induced denaturation of myofibrillar proteins in frozen meat. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64(5):1385-1402. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2116557. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
PMID: 36052640BACKGROUNDGarriga T, Guilarte M, Luengo O, Guillen M, Labrador-Horrillo M, Fadeeva T, Sala A, Cardona V. Frozen fruit skin prick test for the diagnosis of fruit allergy. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2010 Dec;28(4):275-8.
PMID: 21337912BACKGROUNDTerlouw S, van Boven FE, Borsboom-van Zonneveld M, de Graaf-In 't Veld T, Gerth van Wijk R, van Daele PLA, van Maaren MS, Kuijpers JHSAM, Veenbergen S, de Jong NW. Comparison of skin prick test and prick-to-prick test with fruits and vegetables in the diagnosis of food allergy. Clin Transl Allergy. 2024 Jul;14(7):e12375. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12375.
PMID: 38970153BACKGROUNDBegin P, Des Roches A, Nguyen M, Masse MS, Paradis J, Paradis L. Freezing does not alter antigenic properties of fresh fruits for skin testing in patients with birch tree pollen-induced oral allergy syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jun;127(6):1624-6.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.01.028. Epub 2011 Mar 16. No abstract available.
PMID: 21411128BACKGROUNDvan der Valk JP, Gerth van Wijk R, Hoorn E, Groenendijk L, Groenendijk IM, de Jong NW. Measurement and interpretation of skin prick test results. Clin Transl Allergy. 2016 Feb 23;6:8. doi: 10.1186/s13601-016-0092-0. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26909142BACKGROUNDWarren CM, Sehgal S, Sicherer SH, Gupta RS. Epidemiology and the Growing Epidemic of Food Allergy in Children and Adults Across the Globe. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024 Mar;24(3):95-106. doi: 10.1007/s11882-023-01120-y. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
PMID: 38214821BACKGROUNDDribin TE, Motosue MS, Campbell RL. Overview of Allergy and Anaphylaxis. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2022 Feb;40(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
PMID: 34782082BACKGROUNDPax AP, Ong L, Pax RA, Vongsvivut J, Tobin MJ, Kentish SE, Gras SL. Industrial freezing and tempering for optimal functional properties in thawed Mozzarella cheese. Food Chem. 2023 Mar 30;405(Pt B):134933. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134933. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
PMID: 36410214BACKGROUNDBao Y, Ertbjerg P, Estevez M, Yuan L, Gao R. Freezing of meat and aquatic food: Underlying mechanisms and implications on protein oxidation. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2021 Nov;20(6):5548-5569. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12841. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
PMID: 34564951BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- In the context of the study, one person will perform the PT, and a second person, blinded, will read the tests. This second person will not know the order of the PT performed (fresh food versus preserved food).
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2025
First Posted
March 12, 2025
Study Start
April 10, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 10, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 10, 2027
Last Updated
December 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12