NCT06864702

Brief Summary

Hepatocellular Carcinoma(HCC) is a common disease in China, ranking as the fourth most prevalent malignant tumor and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the country. Along with other liver, biliary, pancreatic, and splenic diseases, it poses a serious threat to the lives and health of the Chinese population. Precise organ resection techniques, centered around accurate preoperative imaging and functional assessment as well as meticulous surgical operations, have become the mainstream in hepatobiliary surgery in the 21st century. These techniques require precise dissection of intrahepatic blood vessels, the biliary system, and the pancreatic-splenic duct system to achieve an optimal balance between eradicating lesions and preserving the normal function of the organs while minimizing trauma to the body. Precise tissue resection via laparoscopy is a prerequisite for successful hepatobiliary surgery. Addressing how to assist surgeons in performing surgeries more safely and effectively, as well as how to enhance learning outcomes during training, are pressing issues that need to be resolved. Efficient learning and analysis of surgical videos may help improve surgeons' intraoperative performance. In recent years, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to a surge in the application of computer vision (CV) in medical image analysis, including surgical videos. Laparoscopic surgery generates a large amount of surgical video data, providing a new opportunity for the enhancement of laparoscopic surgical CV technology. AI-based CV technology can utilize these surgical video data to develop real-time automated decision support tools and surgical training systems, offering new directions for addressing the shortcomings of laparoscopic surgery. However, the application of deep learning models in surgical procedures still has some shortcomings. Based on this, the present study aims to conduct a retrospective analysis of cases involving laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeries performed at Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, between 2017 and 2024. The goal is to investigate the recognition and validation of deep learning models for classifying surgical phase images in medical imaging, as well as for semantic segmentation of anatomical structures, surgical instruments, and surgical gestures, including abdominal CT and MRI.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
220

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 20, 2023

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 4, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 7, 2025

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 20, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 15, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 7, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

March 4, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 6, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

artificial inteligence(AI)deep learninglaparoscopic surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • F1 score

    In the accuracy of medical image segmentation, TP represents a case predicted as positive, and the true label is positive; FN represents a case predicted as negative, but the true label is positive; FP represents a case predicted as positive, but the true label is negative; TN represents a case predicted as negative, and the true label is also negative. The F1 score is calculated as F1 = 2 × \[Precision × Recall / (Precision + Recall)\], and it takes into account both the precision and recall of the classification model, defined as the harmonic mean of the model's precision and recall.

    Day 1

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • IoU

    Day 1

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Precision

    Day 1

  • Recall

    Day 1

  • Accuracy

    Day 1

Study Arms (1)

Experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

220 participants were allocated to this group. The intervention is whether the patient received diagnosis and treatment at Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University and retained medical images such as abdominal. The construction of a deep learning model for semantic segmentation of images during laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery in this arm, focusing on classifying surgical stages, anatomical structures, surgical instruments, and surgical gestures, along with the validation of model performance (Intersection over Union, Dice score, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score)

Behavioral: Whether the patient received diagnosis and treatment at Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University and retained medical images such as abdominal

Interventions

The construction of a deep learning model for semantic segmentation of images during laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, focusing on classifying surgical stages, anatomical structures, surgical instruments, and surgical gestures, along with the validation of model performance (Intersection over Union, Dice score, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score).

Experimental group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery at Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, from January 1, 2017, to October 31, 2023.
  • Liver function classified as Child-Pugh grade A or B.
  • Age 18 to 85 years.
  • Complete clinical medical records.

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of underlying diseases that cannot tolerate surgery (such as severe heart, lung, brain, or kidney dysfunction).
  • Preoperative imaging examinations and intraoperative findings of cancer thrombus in the main and branch of the portal vein, common hepatic duct and its branches, hepatic vein main and branch, and inferior vena cava.
  • Intraoperative findings of extrahepatic invasion and metastasis.
  • Planned pregnancy, unplanned pregnancy, and pregnant individuals.
  • Preoperative liver function classified as Child-Pugh grade C.
  • Previous history of treatments such as radiofrequency or microwave ablation, radiotherapy, liver transplantation, etc.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510280, China

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Beyersdorffer P, Kunert W, Jansen K, Miller J, Wilhelm P, Burgert O, Kirschniak A, Rolinger J. Detection of adverse events leading to inadvertent injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using convolutional neural networks. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2021 Mar 1;66(4):413-421. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2020-0106. Print 2021 Aug 26.

    PMID: 33655738BACKGROUND
  • Golany T, Aides A, Freedman D, Rabani N, Liu Y, Rivlin E, Corrado GS, Matias Y, Khoury W, Kashtan H, Reissman P. Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9215-9223. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

    PMID: 35941306BACKGROUND
  • Kim JH, Kim H. Modified liver hanging maneuver in laparoscopic major hepatectomy: the learning curve and evolution of indications. Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2742-2748. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07248-1. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

    PMID: 31712899BACKGROUND
  • Gaitanidis A, Simopoulos C, Pitiakoudis M. What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Mar;22(3):151-160. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1760-y. Epub 2018 Mar 6.

    PMID: 29512045BACKGROUND
  • Vaz RM, Bordenali G, Bibancos M. Testicular Cancer-Surgical Treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 May 15;10:308. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00308. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31156556BACKGROUND
  • Moris D, Vernadakis S. Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Opportunities, the Challenges, and the Limitations. Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):e16. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002458. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28746157BACKGROUND
  • Yoon YI, Kim KH, Kang SH, Kim WJ, Shin MH, Lee SK, Jung DH, Park GC, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Ha TY, Song GW, Hwang S, Lee SG. Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):856-863. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002072.

    PMID: 27849661BACKGROUND
  • Han HS, Shehta A, Ahn S, Yoon YS, Cho JY, Choi Y. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: Case-matched study with propensity score matching. J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):643-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 12.

    PMID: 25872167BACKGROUND
  • Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H, Takano H, Owada Y, Enomoto T, Oda T, Miura H, Yamanashi T, Watanabe M, Sato D, Sugomori Y, Hara S, Ito M. Real-time automatic surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy using the convolutional neural network-based deep learning approach. Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4924-4931. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07281-0. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

    PMID: 31797047BACKGROUND
  • Ziogas IA, Tsoulfas G. Advances and challenges in laparoscopic surgery in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Dec 27;9(12):233-245. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i12.233.

    PMID: 29359029BACKGROUND
  • Rivas H, Diaz-Calderon D. Present and future advanced laparoscopic surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 May;6(2):59-67. doi: 10.1111/ases.12028.

    PMID: 23601993BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2025

First Posted

March 7, 2025

Study Start

December 20, 2023

Primary Completion

March 20, 2025

Study Completion

May 15, 2025

Last Updated

March 7, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-11

Locations