The Construction and Effect Verification of a Deep Learning-based Automated Semantic Segmentation Model for Medical Imaging
1 other identifier
interventional
220
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hepatocellular Carcinoma(HCC) is a common disease in China, ranking as the fourth most prevalent malignant tumor and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the country. Along with other liver, biliary, pancreatic, and splenic diseases, it poses a serious threat to the lives and health of the Chinese population. Precise organ resection techniques, centered around accurate preoperative imaging and functional assessment as well as meticulous surgical operations, have become the mainstream in hepatobiliary surgery in the 21st century. These techniques require precise dissection of intrahepatic blood vessels, the biliary system, and the pancreatic-splenic duct system to achieve an optimal balance between eradicating lesions and preserving the normal function of the organs while minimizing trauma to the body. Precise tissue resection via laparoscopy is a prerequisite for successful hepatobiliary surgery. Addressing how to assist surgeons in performing surgeries more safely and effectively, as well as how to enhance learning outcomes during training, are pressing issues that need to be resolved. Efficient learning and analysis of surgical videos may help improve surgeons' intraoperative performance. In recent years, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to a surge in the application of computer vision (CV) in medical image analysis, including surgical videos. Laparoscopic surgery generates a large amount of surgical video data, providing a new opportunity for the enhancement of laparoscopic surgical CV technology. AI-based CV technology can utilize these surgical video data to develop real-time automated decision support tools and surgical training systems, offering new directions for addressing the shortcomings of laparoscopic surgery. However, the application of deep learning models in surgical procedures still has some shortcomings. Based on this, the present study aims to conduct a retrospective analysis of cases involving laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeries performed at Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, between 2017 and 2024. The goal is to investigate the recognition and validation of deep learning models for classifying surgical phase images in medical imaging, as well as for semantic segmentation of anatomical structures, surgical instruments, and surgical gestures, including abdominal CT and MRI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 20, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2025
CompletedMarch 7, 2025
November 1, 2024
1.2 years
March 4, 2025
March 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
F1 score
In the accuracy of medical image segmentation, TP represents a case predicted as positive, and the true label is positive; FN represents a case predicted as negative, but the true label is positive; FP represents a case predicted as positive, but the true label is negative; TN represents a case predicted as negative, and the true label is also negative. The F1 score is calculated as F1 = 2 × \[Precision × Recall / (Precision + Recall)\], and it takes into account both the precision and recall of the classification model, defined as the harmonic mean of the model's precision and recall.
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (1)
IoU
Day 1
Other Outcomes (3)
Precision
Day 1
Recall
Day 1
Accuracy
Day 1
Study Arms (1)
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTAL220 participants were allocated to this group. The intervention is whether the patient received diagnosis and treatment at Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University and retained medical images such as abdominal. The construction of a deep learning model for semantic segmentation of images during laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery in this arm, focusing on classifying surgical stages, anatomical structures, surgical instruments, and surgical gestures, along with the validation of model performance (Intersection over Union, Dice score, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score)
Interventions
The construction of a deep learning model for semantic segmentation of images during laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, focusing on classifying surgical stages, anatomical structures, surgical instruments, and surgical gestures, along with the validation of model performance (Intersection over Union, Dice score, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery at Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, from January 1, 2017, to October 31, 2023.
- Liver function classified as Child-Pugh grade A or B.
- Age 18 to 85 years.
- Complete clinical medical records.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of underlying diseases that cannot tolerate surgery (such as severe heart, lung, brain, or kidney dysfunction).
- Preoperative imaging examinations and intraoperative findings of cancer thrombus in the main and branch of the portal vein, common hepatic duct and its branches, hepatic vein main and branch, and inferior vena cava.
- Intraoperative findings of extrahepatic invasion and metastasis.
- Planned pregnancy, unplanned pregnancy, and pregnant individuals.
- Preoperative liver function classified as Child-Pugh grade C.
- Previous history of treatments such as radiofrequency or microwave ablation, radiotherapy, liver transplantation, etc.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510280, China
Related Publications (11)
Beyersdorffer P, Kunert W, Jansen K, Miller J, Wilhelm P, Burgert O, Kirschniak A, Rolinger J. Detection of adverse events leading to inadvertent injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using convolutional neural networks. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2021 Mar 1;66(4):413-421. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2020-0106. Print 2021 Aug 26.
PMID: 33655738BACKGROUNDGolany T, Aides A, Freedman D, Rabani N, Liu Y, Rivlin E, Corrado GS, Matias Y, Khoury W, Kashtan H, Reissman P. Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9215-9223. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
PMID: 35941306BACKGROUNDKim JH, Kim H. Modified liver hanging maneuver in laparoscopic major hepatectomy: the learning curve and evolution of indications. Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2742-2748. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07248-1. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
PMID: 31712899BACKGROUNDGaitanidis A, Simopoulos C, Pitiakoudis M. What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Mar;22(3):151-160. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1760-y. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
PMID: 29512045BACKGROUNDVaz RM, Bordenali G, Bibancos M. Testicular Cancer-Surgical Treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 May 15;10:308. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00308. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31156556BACKGROUNDMoris D, Vernadakis S. Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Opportunities, the Challenges, and the Limitations. Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):e16. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002458. No abstract available.
PMID: 28746157BACKGROUNDYoon YI, Kim KH, Kang SH, Kim WJ, Shin MH, Lee SK, Jung DH, Park GC, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Ha TY, Song GW, Hwang S, Lee SG. Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):856-863. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002072.
PMID: 27849661BACKGROUNDHan HS, Shehta A, Ahn S, Yoon YS, Cho JY, Choi Y. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: Case-matched study with propensity score matching. J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):643-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
PMID: 25872167BACKGROUNDKitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H, Takano H, Owada Y, Enomoto T, Oda T, Miura H, Yamanashi T, Watanabe M, Sato D, Sugomori Y, Hara S, Ito M. Real-time automatic surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy using the convolutional neural network-based deep learning approach. Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4924-4931. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07281-0. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
PMID: 31797047BACKGROUNDZiogas IA, Tsoulfas G. Advances and challenges in laparoscopic surgery in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Dec 27;9(12):233-245. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i12.233.
PMID: 29359029BACKGROUNDRivas H, Diaz-Calderon D. Present and future advanced laparoscopic surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 May;6(2):59-67. doi: 10.1111/ases.12028.
PMID: 23601993BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2025
First Posted
March 7, 2025
Study Start
December 20, 2023
Primary Completion
March 20, 2025
Study Completion
May 15, 2025
Last Updated
March 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-11