The Impact of AI Assistance on Radiologist Performance and Healthcare Costs in LDCT-Based Lung Cancer Screening
Evaluation of AI-Assisted Versus Conventional Human Reading for Lung Cancer Screening in Community-Based Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
7,294
1 country
1
Brief Summary
AI diagnostic systems show great promise for improving lung cancer screening in community healthcare settings. While not originally designed for primary care, these tools demonstrate capabilities in nodule detection and workflow optimization. However, their effectiveness in resource-limited community centers requires thorough evaluation. This RCT compares AI-assisted versus manual CT interpretation across community health centers. Expert radiologists will establish reference standards, while an independent committee blindly evaluates cases from both groups. The study assesses diagnostic accuracy, operational efficiency, and cost-effectiveness, with blinded analysts resolving discrepancies through consensus to ensure reliable results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable lung-cancer
Started Jul 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 7, 2026
CompletedJune 26, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.3 years
May 16, 2025
June 23, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Diagnostic Accuracy
Sensitivity and Specificity: Comparison of AI-assisted versus manual interpretation in detecting malignant pulmonary nodules, validated against histopathological confirmation or 12-month clinical follow-up. Early Detection Rate: Proportion of stage I/II lung cancers correctly identified by each method.
One year after entry
Interpretation Consistency
Inter-reader Agreement: Measured by Cohen's kappa (κ) between AI-assisted radiologists and the independent review committee (IRC). Intra-reader Variability: Consistency of nodule classification in repeat readings (subset analysis).
One year after entry
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Cost-Effectiveness
One year after entry
Study Arms (2)
AI-Assisted Group
EXPERIMENTALThe AI-assisted group utilized AI-powered diagnostic software for interpreting low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans
The manual interpretation group
NO INTERVENTIONThe manual interpretation group relied on standard radiologist evaluation for analyzing low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans.
Interventions
An integrated AI-human collaborative workflow for lung cancer screening interpretation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 45-74 years
- Permanent resident of participating study communities
- No prior history of lung cancer and no lung cancer screening within the past 3 months
- Able to comprehend and voluntarily sign informed consent, with willingness to participate in long-term follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer
- Those with severe comorbidities contraindicating CT imaging
- Inability to understand study protocols or provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment
- Concurrent participation in other clinical trials that may interfere with study outcomes
- Unable to comply with follow-up requirements
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2025
First Posted
May 25, 2025
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 31, 2025
Study Completion
January 7, 2026
Last Updated
June 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share