Thread Embedding vs. Electroacupuncture for Post-Stroke Aphasia
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Thread Embedding and Electroacupuncture in Speech-Language Rehabilitation in Patients With Post-Stroke Aphasia
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial was to learn if thread embedding or electroacupuncture can treat language function impairment in patients with post-stroke aphasia, a condition affecting communication after a stroke. The main questions it aimed to answer were: Does thread embedding improve overall language function more effectively than electroacupuncture, as measured by the Goodglass and Kaplan Aphasia Severity Rating Scale (ASRS)? How do thread embedding and electroacupuncture compare in improving specific language skills, such as motor speech, sensory language, reading, and naming, as assessed by the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE)? Researchers compared thread embedding (TE group) to electroacupuncture (EA group) to see if thread embedding provides better or similar effects on language recovery. Participants: Underwent a 30-day intervention with language assessments at the start and end of the period. Were randomly assigned to either the thread embedding group, receiving treatment every 10 days, or the electroacupuncture group, receiving daily 20-minute sessions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2025
CompletedMarch 7, 2025
March 1, 2025
12 months
March 2, 2025
March 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE)
The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) is a comprehensive and standardized tool designed to evaluate specific language functions in individuals with aphasia. It provides detailed insights into various language domains, including: Motor speech: Assesses articulation and fluency. Sensory language: Evaluates comprehension of spoken language. Reading skills: Measures the ability to read and understand written text. Naming skills: Tests the ability to name objects or concepts. Each domain is scored on a scale from 0 to 4, where: 0: Indicates severe impairment (e.g., complete inability to speak or comprehend). 4: Reflects mild or no impairment (near-normal language function). In practice, the BDAE is administered through structured tasks such as picture naming, sentence repetition, auditory comprehension tests, and reading exercises.
Day 0 and Day 30
Goodglass and Kaplan's Aphasia Severity Rating Scale (ASRS)
The Goodglass and Kaplan's Aphasia Severity Rating Scale (ASRS) is a widely used tool that assesses the overall severity of aphasia. It employs a single scale ranging from 0 to 5 to summarize the general impact of aphasia on a patient's communication abilities: 0: Very severe aphasia (e.g., no meaningful speech or comprehension). 1-2: Severe aphasia (e.g., limited speech and poor comprehension). 3-4: Moderate to mild aphasia (e.g., functional communication with noticeable deficits). 5: Minimal or no aphasia (near-normal language function). The ASRS is typically scored based on clinical observation and interaction with the patient, focusing on their performance in everyday communication tasks like spontaneous speech, following commands, and answering questions.
Day 0 and Day 30
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Adverse Events of Thread Embedding
Throughout the 30-day intervention period
Other Outcomes (1)
Baseline Characteristics
Day 0
Study Arms (2)
Cagut Thread Embedding Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients received catgut thread embedding at day 0, day 10 and day 20.
Electroacupuncture Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received daily electroacupuncture for 20 minutes over 30 days.
Interventions
Catgut Thread Embedding involved implanting chromic catgut size 4.0 thread, which is attached to a 23G guide needle, into subcutaneous tissue at EX-HN21 acupoint. The guide needle was removed after insertion, while the thread remained and dissolved over 10-15 days to provide continuous stimulation.
Electroacupuncture was administered using four needles (0.3 × 25 mm, diameter × length) inserted at GV-20, EX-HN21, external EX-HN12, and external EX-HN13 acupoints. Electrical stimulation was delivered via the KWD-808I Multipurpose Health Device (Changzhou Yingdi Electronic Medical Device Co., China) with parameters set at 3 Hz frequency and 0.6 ms pulse width, the intensity was adjusted according to the patient's perception. Electroacupuncture was performed daily, except on Saturdays, Sundays, and Vietnamese national holidays, over a treatment course of 30 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with post-stroke aphasia (severity levels 0-4 on the Goodglass and Kaplan scale)
- Aged 18 years or older
- Fluent in Vietnamese
- Alert and mentally competent (no psychiatric or neurological disorders affecting communication)
- No pre-existing speech or language disorders
- Willing to participate and provide signed informed consent
- Treated as inpatients at the Traditional Medicine Hospital, Dak Lak
You may not qualify if:
- Severe physical exhaustion or skin ulcers/infections at intervention sites
- Presence of a pacemaker
- Allergy to catgut threads
- Post-stroke patients awaiting cranioplasty
- Complex disease progression requiring alternative treatments during the study (data analyzed as treatment failures)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Traditional Medicine Hospital
Buon Ma Thuot, Dak Lak, 63100, Vietnam
Related Publications (5)
Sinanovic O, Mrkonjic Z, Zukic S, Vidovic M, Imamovic K. Post-stroke language disorders. Acta Clin Croat. 2011 Mar;50(1):79-94.
PMID: 22034787BACKGROUNDMazaux JM, Lagadec T, de Seze MP, Zongo D, Asselineau J, Douce E, Trias J, Delair MF, Darrigrand B. Communication activity in stroke patients with aphasia. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Apr;45(4):341-6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1122.
PMID: 23468019BACKGROUNDGerstenecker A, Lazar RM. Language recovery following stroke. Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Jul;33(5):928-947. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1562093. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
PMID: 30698070BACKGROUNDLazar RM, Speizer AE, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. Variability in language recovery after first-time stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 May;79(5):530-4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.122457. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
PMID: 17846113BACKGROUNDBerthier ML, Garcia-Casares N, Walsh SF, Nabrozidis A, Ruiz de Mier RJ, Green C, Davila G, Gutierrez A, Pulvermuller F. Recovery from post-stroke aphasia: lessons from brain imaging and implications for rehabilitation and biological treatments. Discov Med. 2011 Oct;12(65):275-89.
PMID: 22031666BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Minh-Anh Ngo Le Nguyen, Doctor of Philosophy
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Linh Anh Truong, Master of Science
Tay Nguyen University, Buon Ma Thuot City, Dak Lak Province, Vietnam
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor, Master of Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2025
First Posted
March 7, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2021
Primary Completion
July 31, 2022
Study Completion
July 31, 2022
Last Updated
March 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03