Trigger Point Electroacupuncture Treatment in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
Evaluation of the Analgesic Efficacy of Trigger Point Electroacupuncture in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: a Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Electroacupuncture is an application of acupuncture combined with electrical stimulation of acupuncture points through acupuncture needles to achieve faster pain relief than acupuncture. Recently, research has shown that Trigger point acupuncture has a significant effect in reducing pain better than acupuncture on acupoints in patients with chronic low back pain. However, no research has compared the pain relief effect between Trigger Point electroacupuncture and electroacupuncture on acupoints in patients with chronic low back pain. This study was conducted to address this question.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 15, 2025
CompletedAugust 29, 2025
August 1, 2025
4 months
March 2, 2025
August 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of VAS pain intensity between electroacupuncture at the trigger point and electroacupuncture traditional point group
With the VAS, participants were asked to make a hatch mark on a 100 mm line that represents their average pain intensity. These were then converted to a numerical score for each face (i.e. 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10), depending on the face selected. The end-point descriptors for VAS was "No pain" (0, 0 mm, and the face representing no pain, respectively) and "The most intense pain imaginable" (10, 100 mm, and the face representing the most intense pain level, respectively).
Baseline, after 3 sessions, after 5 sessions, after 7 sessions, after 10 sessions
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of BPI index between electroacupuncture at the trigger point and electroacupuncture traditional point group.
Baseline, after 5 sessions, and after 10 sessions
Other Outcomes (1)
Comparison of trigger point count between electroacupuncture at the trigger point and electroacupuncture traditional point group
Baseline, after 5 sessions, and after 10 sessions
Study Arms (2)
Electro-acupuncture at traditional points
SHAM COMPARATOR30 patients with non-radiating low back pain for at least three months and normal neurological examination received treatment electro-cupuncture at traditional points for 10 sessions over 4 weeks, electroacupuncture was administered once per session, three sessions per week, on alternate days, with rest on Saturdays and Sundays. Visual analogue scale (VAS) will be recorded after 1 session, 3 session, 5 session, 7 session and 10 session. BPI index and Trigger point count will be recorded after 1 session, 5 session, 10 session.
Electro-acupuncture at the Trigger point
ACTIVE COMPARATOR30 patients with non-radiating low back pain for at least three months and normal neurological examination received treatment electro-acupuncture at the Trigger point for 10 sessions over 4 weeks, electroacupuncture was administered once per session, three sessions per week, on alternate days, with rest on Saturdays and Sundays. Visual analogue scale (VAS) will be recorded after 1 session, 3 session, 5 session, 7 session and 10 session. BPI index and Trigger point count will be recorded after 1 session, 5 session, 10 session.
Interventions
Electroacupuncture at Trigger Points is electroacupuncture at predetermined trigger points. Electroacupuncture at traditional acupoints is electroacupuncture at the following points: Jiaji (L2-L5), Yaoyangguan (GV3), Shendu (BL23), Dachangdu (BL25), and Weizhong (BL40).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 20 or older who consented to participate in the study;
- Individuals experiencing LBP persisting for more than 3 months with an average VAS score of 5 cm or over;
- Patients displaying trigger points in back
You may not qualify if:
- Major trauma or systemic disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, Scheuermann disease;
- Systemic symptoms such as weight loss, fever of unknown origin, anorexia, personal history of malignancy, diffuse pain and joint stiffness;
- Symptoms of infection such as fever, meningeal irritation signs, photophobia;
- Symptoms of central motor neuron damage such as Hoffmann sign, Babinski sign, hyperreflexia, spasticity, incontinence, sexual dysfunction;
- Symptoms of serious acute diseases such as myocardial infarction (chest pain, sweating, shortness of breath), arterial dissections (tearing sensation, headache, blurred vision);
- Conditions unsuitable for acupuncture such as inflammation of skin in need of acupuncture, weak or exhausted patients, severe comorbidities;
- Being treated with other methods. Elimination criteria: Patients experiencing adverse events from the intervention leading to their discomfort and withdrawal from the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Medical Center HCMC - Branch no.3, Ho Chi Minh
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Related Publications (4)
Leite PMS, Mendonca ARC, Maciel LYS, Poderoso-Neto ML, Araujo CCA, Gois HCJ, Souza JHS, DeSantana JM. Does Electroacupuncture Treatment Reduce Pain and Change Quantitative Sensory Testing Responses in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain? A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Oct 8;2018:8586746. doi: 10.1155/2018/8586746. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30402136BACKGROUNDSchliessbach J, van der Klift E, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M, Streitberger K. The effect of brief electrical and manual acupuncture stimulation on mechanical experimental pain. Pain Med. 2011 Feb;12(2):268-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01051.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
PMID: 21276188BACKGROUNDItoh K, Katsumi Y, Kitakoji H. Trigger point acupuncture treatment of chronic low back pain in elderly patients--a blinded RCT. Acupunct Med. 2004 Dec;22(4):170-7. doi: 10.1136/aim.22.4.170.
PMID: 15628774BACKGROUNDItoh K, Katsumi Y, Hirota S, Kitakoji H. Effects of trigger point acupuncture on chronic low back pain in elderly patients--a sham-controlled randomised trial. Acupunct Med. 2006 Mar;24(1):5-12. doi: 10.1136/aim.24.1.5.
PMID: 16618043BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The study participants will not know which electroacupuncture group they are in. The acupuncturist and the data processor are 2 different people.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor of Philosophy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2025
First Posted
March 10, 2025
Study Start
March 15, 2025
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
July 15, 2025
Last Updated
August 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08