NCT06825767

Brief Summary

Our primary goal is to investigate the advantages of low-intensity laser therapy (LLLT) and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) over conventional therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), our secondary goal is to investigate the advantages of HILT and LLLT; to compare its analgesic effects, its effects on functional status and quality of life, and its effects on femoral cartilage thickness.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
72

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2020

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2021

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 8, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 13, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 13, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

February 8, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 8, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Low level light therapy, high level light therapy,Muscle Skeletal; Ultrasonography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • range of motion

    In the clinical evaluation, the range of motion of the patients in the affected extremity was determined by goniometry

    Baseline, after 1 month and 3 month changes

  • visual pain score (VAS)

    In the clinical evaluation, the pain score with movement and resting was determined by visual pain score (VAS).The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain.

    Baseline, after 1 month and 3 month changes

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)

    Baseline, after 1 month and 3 month changes

  • Lequesne Index

    Baseline, after 1 month and 3 month changes

  • Short form SF-36 scale

    Baseline, after 1 month and 3 month changes

  • Femoral cartilage thickness

    Baseline, after 1 month and 3 month changes

Study Arms (3)

conventional treatment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional treatment including hotpack therapy, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), joint range of motion exercises, straight leg lifting exercises, quadriceps strengthening exercises, pillow squeezing exercises, balance exercises on one leg for 4 weeks, 3 days a week for 4 weeks in 24 patients.

Device: Conventional Treatment

conventional treatment and HILT(high-intensity laser therapy)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional treatment and HILT including hotpack therapy, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), joint range of motion exercises, straight leg lifting exercises, quadriceps strengthening exercises, pillow squeezing exercises, balance exercises on one leg and HILT for 4 weeks, 3 days a week for 4 weeks in 24 patients .

Device: conventional treatment and high-intensity laser therapy(HILT)

conventional treatment and LLLT(low-intensity laser therapy)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional treatment and LLLT including hotpack therapy, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), joint range of motion exercises, straight leg lifting exercises, quadriceps strengthening exercises, pillow squeezing exercises, balance exercises on one leg and LLLT for 4 weeks, 3 days a week for 4 weeks in 24 patients.

Device: conventional treatment and low-intensity laser therapy (LLLT)

Interventions

Conventional treatment including hotpack therapy, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), joint range of motion exercises, straight leg lifting exercises, quadriceps strengthening exercises, pillow squeezing exercises, balance exercises on one leg for 4 weeks, 3 days a week for 4 weeks in 24 patients

conventional treatment

Conventional treatment and HILT including hotpack therapy, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), joint range of motion exercises, straight leg lifting exercises, quadriceps strengthening exercises, pillow squeezing exercises, balance exercises on one leg and HILT for 4 weeks, 3 days a week for 4 weeks in 24 patients .

conventional treatment and HILT(high-intensity laser therapy)

Conventional treatment and LLLT including hotpack therapy, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), joint range of motion exercises, straight leg lifting exercises, quadriceps strengthening exercises, pillow squeezing exercises, balance exercises on one leg and LLLT for 4 weeks, 3 days a week for 4 weeks in 24 patients.

conventional treatment and LLLT(low-intensity laser therapy)

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age range of 55-75 years
  • Primary knee OA diagnosis according to ACR (American College of Rheumatology) and Knee OA classified as stage 2-3 according to the KL (Kellgren-Lawrence) radiological classification
  • Visual pain score of 4 or higher for knee pain lasting for at least 3 months

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with secondary knee OA
  • Patients who have undergone surgical operations related to the knee joint
  • Patients with pathology in the hip and/or ankle on the same side
  • Patients who have received intra-articular corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid, or PRP injections in the knee joint in the last 6 months
  • Patients who have received physical therapy for the knee region in the last 6 months
  • Patients with serious systemic diseases such as malignancy, congestive heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Patients with insufficient cognitive function

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Phisical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital

Ankara, Bilkent-Cankaya, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2025

First Posted

February 13, 2025

Study Start

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion

June 1, 2021

Study Completion

October 1, 2021

Last Updated

February 13, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations