To Investigate the Effects of Robotic-assisted Gait Training in Stroke Patients
Investigation Of The Effects Of Virtual Reality Application With Robotic Rehabilitation In Patients With Chronic Stroke.
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of the study was to investigate the effects of robot-assisted gait training and virtual reality on knee joint position sense in patients with chronic stroke. The secondary objective is to examine the effectiveness of these applications on functional gait and balance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 5, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2020
CompletedFebruary 5, 2020
February 1, 2020
2 months
June 26, 2019
February 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
functional ambulation classification (FAC)
FAC is used to assess ambulation ability. It is a valid and reliable scale that evaluates the physical support needed during gait from 6 to 0 points. A high score indicates a good gait and a decrease in score indicates a poor gait.
Before treatment
Activity-Specific Balance Safety Scale
The level of confidence that the patient feels in daily life activities that require balance skills will be assessed with the Activity-Specific Balance Safety Scale. In this scale, individuals are asked to rate the safety feeling they feel between 0% and 100% when performing 16 activities that require the specified balance skill. A score of 100% indicates that the activity will be performed completely safely, and a score of 0% indicates that the activity is not safe at all.
change from baseline score at the end of 5 weeks
Modified Ashworth Scale
It is a reliable, valid scale commonly used in the assessment of muscle tone. Resistance to passive motion is graded between 0 and 4. A score of 0 defines normal in muscle tone. the score of 1 defines minimal resistance is felt at the end of the range of motion, the score of 1+ defines resistance is felt in less than half of the range of motion, the score of 2 defines resistance is felt in most of the range of motion, but the affected part is easily moved, the score of 3 defines the resistance along the range of motion of the joint is greater and passive movement is difficult, the score of 4 defines the joint movement of the points is restricted and movement is not revealed.
Before treatment
Modified Rankin Scale
Modified Rankin Scale will be used to determine the disability level of stroke individuals. The Modified Rankin Scale is a widely used, reliable scale to assess functional status after stroke. In this scale, disability is defined at 7 levels. While 6 points are defined as death, 0 points define completely normal functional status. 0 points indicate no symptoms, 1 point indicates that there is no disability despite symptoms, 2 points indicate mild disability, 3 points moderate disability; 4 points moderate-severe disability; 5 points represent severe disability and 6 points represent death.
change from baseline score at the end of 5 weeks
Stroke Rehabilitation Movement Assessment Scale- STREAM
STREAM, which is widely used in post-stroke motor evaluation, is a valid and reliable scale. STREAM consists of 2 sections and a total of 30 tests evaluating the functional movements and basic mobility activities of the upper and lower extremities. Limb movements are evaluated with 2 points and mobility activities with 3 points. The highest score is 70. A high score indicates that motor impairment is low, and a decrease in score indicates an increase in motor impairment.
change from baseline score at the end of 5 weeks
Time up and go test
It is a test where balance and functional mobility are evaluated together.
change from baseline time at the end of 5 weeks
Mobile Phone-Based Joint Angle Measurement
DrGoniometer is an iPhone based joint goniometer application. With the DrGoniometer, the measurement is achieved by positioning a virtual goniometer that appears on the smartphone screen on a photo from the smartphone camera. The clinician takes a photograph of the extremity, records it, measures the joint angle and observes the value. Approximation of the difference between the target angle and the angle applied by the patient represents a good sense of joint position.
change from baseline angle at the end of 5 weeks
Berg Balance Scale
It will be used to evaluate the functional balance. Berg balance scale includes 14 tests, which are graded between 0 and 4 by observing the patient's performance. higher values represent a better equilibrium state. A score of 0-20 indicates an imbalance, a score of 21-40 indicates an acceptable balance, a score of 41-56 indicates a good balance.
change from baseline score at the end of 5 weeks
goniometric measurement
Proprioception can be defined as the perception of the position and of the movement of various body parts in space. Its role is essential in sensorimotor control for movement acuity, joint stability, coordination, and balance. Its clinical evaluation is commonly based on the assessment of the joint position sense (JPS). Both ROM and JPS measurements require estimating angles through goniometer, scoliometer, laser-pointer, and bubble or digital inclinometer. The goniometer will be used to assess the sense of joint position. Approximation of the difference between the target angle and the angle applied by the patient represents a good sense of joint position.
change from baseline angle at the end of 5 weeks
Study Arms (2)
study group
ACTIVE COMPARATORvirtual reality, robot-assisted gait training, conventional treatment
control group
OTHERconventional treatment
Interventions
study group: 15 sessions virtual reality, robot assisted gait training
study group: 15 sessions conventional treatment control group: 30 sessions conventional treatment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having been diagnosed with stroke by specialist physician,
- months after stroke diagnosis,
- Hemiplegia or hemiparesis due to stroke for the first time,
- Being over 18,
- Being able to walk with auxiliary device or independently,
- Mini Mental test score\> 24,
- Functional Ambulation Classification FAC ≥ 2,
- Agree to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute internal discomfort,
- Botulinum toxin administration during 6 months before treatment or during treatment,
- Presence of a history of previous stroke,
- Having influence on both sides,
- Neglect syndrome,
- Presence of severe spasticity (Modified Ashwort Scale\> 2),
- Patients weighing more than 100 kg,
- Patients with femoral lengths greater than 50cm
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gazi Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Kozaklı Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital
Nevşehir, Kozakli, 50600, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Arzu Güçlü Gündüz, prof.
Gazi University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2019
First Posted
July 25, 2019
Study Start
October 15, 2019
Primary Completion
December 5, 2019
Study Completion
January 20, 2020
Last Updated
February 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02