NCT06813066

Brief Summary

The study assesses the potential of using computational models, specifically large language models, to simulate psychotherapeutic sessions, aiming to improve therapy outcomes and advance therapist training through innovative technology.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
520

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 3, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 6, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 22, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

February 3, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 18, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

In silico PsychotherapyArtificial intelligence (AI) applicationsMotivational Interviewing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Simulation's Accuracy in generating Psychotherapeutic Dialogues

    Assessment of the simulation's ability to accurately produce psychotherapeutic dialogues that adhere to the principles and techniques of motivational interviewing (MI), as determined by the average global scores of the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) code 4.2. The MITI code 4.2 includes various subscales, such as empathy and MI spirit, each scored on a scale from 1 to 5, with lower scores suggesting a need for improvement in MI delivery, while higher scores reflect stronger therapeutic skills and better patient outcomes.

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Number of Errors/Deviations

    12 months

  • Metric of Verbal Content (Therapist)

    12 months

  • Metric of Verbal Content (Patient)

    12 months

  • Turn-takings

    12 months

  • Improvement of Patient

    12 months

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

High Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors

EXPERIMENTAL

In this group, the patient-large language model (LLM) interacted with a therapist-LLM prompted to exhibit high levels of positive common factors.

Behavioral: High Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors

Low Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors

EXPERIMENTAL

In this group, the patient-large language model (LLM) interacted with a therapist-LLM prompted to exhibit low levels of positive common factors.

Behavioral: Low Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors

Transcripts of real intervention sessions

OTHER

This group consists of published transcripts of real intervention sessions, in which motivational interview techniques have been applied.

Behavioral: Standard motivational interviewing

Interventions

The therapist large language model (LLM) is designed to show high levels of empathy, warmth, and genuineness. This setup aims to create a supportive and trusting therapeutic environment to improve patient engagement. High levels of these positive factors are linked to better psychotherapy outcomes and a stronger therapist-patient relationship.

High Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors

The therapist LLM for this group is designed to show low levels of empathy, warmth, and genuineness. This setup aims to examine how a less supportive and empathetic therapist affects psychotherapy sessions. Lower levels of these positive behaviors can lead to reduced patient engagement and a weaker therapist-patient relationship, potentially hindering therapy outcomes.

Low Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors

Motivational interviewing techniques as applied during the sessions on which the transcripts are based.

Transcripts of real intervention sessions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Simulation of psychotherapy sessions of conversations between an adult person presenting with a mental or behavioral health problem and a psychotherapist using large language models and 8 real-world transcripts

You may not qualify if:

  • Simulation protocols with severe simulation errors

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Basel

Basel, 4031, Switzerland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Gunther Meinlschmidt, Prof. Dr.

    University Hospital and University of Basel

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2025

First Posted

February 6, 2025

Study Start

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion

August 31, 2025

Study Completion

August 31, 2025

Last Updated

May 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Locations