Pain Reduction Using Vibration and Topical Anesthesia
TG-EB-Eff
Comparison of Mucosal Vibration and Benzocaine Gel in Reducing Pain During Administration of Local Anesthesia in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to study if a powered toothbrush providing vibrations compared with 20% benzocaine topical gel is more effective in reducing pain before local anesthetic injections in children aged 6-12 years undergoing dental procedures. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the powered toothbrush reduce pain more effectively than the 20% benzocaine topical gel? How do children perceive and respond to each method using subjective and objective pain measurement tools? Researchers will compare the use of a powered toothbrush to 20% benzocaine topical gel to see which method minimizes pain during infiltration anesthesia in pediatric patients. Participants will: Be divided into two groups: Group A: Receive 20% benzocaine topical gel before injection. Group B: Use a powered toothbrush at the injection site before administration. Report pain levels using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale and have their pain responses measured using the SEM Scale. Study Details: Randomized clinical trial with convenience sampling. Inclusion criteria: Children aged 6-12 years, ASA I classification, and positive Frankl behavior rating. Exclusion criteria: Intellectual impairments, allergies to local anesthesia, or systemic health conditions. Study duration: \[November 2024 to December 2024\]. Ethical Considerations: Participation is voluntary, with informed consent required. Responses will remain confidential, and all ethical guidelines will be followed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for early_phase_1
Started Nov 2024
Shorter than P25 for early_phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 28, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 3, 2025
CompletedApril 2, 2025
November 1, 2024
1 month
January 7, 2025
March 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Measure Title: Pain Levels as Assessed by SEM (Sound, Eye, Motor) Scale
Evaluation of objective pain responses during local anesthesia administration using the SEM scale. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 9 (severe pain).
"During the intervention, within 5 minutes"
Pain Levels as Assessed by Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale
Self-reported subjective pain levels assessed by the Wong-Baker FACES scale, ranging from 0 (no hurt) to 10 (hurts worst).
"Immediately after the intervention, within 1-5 minutes"
Study Arms (2)
Topical Anesthesia Group (20% Benzocaine Gel)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group will receive 20% Benzocaine Gel applied topically to the injection site for 5 minutes before administering local anesthesia. Pain levels will be assessed using both subjective (Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale) and objective (SEM Scale) measures.
Vibration Group (Powered Toothbrush)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive vibratory stimulation using a powered toothbrush applied to the injection site for a minimum of one minute before administering local anesthesia. Pain levels will be assessed using both subjective (Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale) and objective (SEM Scale) measures.
Interventions
Participants in this group received 20% Benzocaine Gel applied to the injection site for 5 minutes prior to local anesthesia administration. The gel acts as a topical anesthetic to numb the area and reduce pain perception during the injection procedure.
Participants in this group received vibration stimulation using a powered toothbrush applied to the injection site for 1 minute before the local anesthesia injection. The vibration works on the principle of gate control theory, aiming to disrupt pain signals and reduce discomfort during the injection procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 6-12 years.
- Children classified as ASA I (American Society of Anesthesiologists).
- Children with FRANKL Behavior Rating Scale of "positive" or "definitely positive."
You may not qualify if:
- Intellectually impaired/Autistic
- Patient allergic to L.A
- Patient with systemic health condition
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Of Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, 53700, Pakistan
Related Publications (4)
AlHareky M, AlHumaid J, Bedi S, El Tantawi M, AlGahtani M, AlYousef Y. Effect of a Vibration System on Pain Reduction during Injection of Dental Anesthesia in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Dent. 2021 Jan 30;2021:8896408. doi: 10.1155/2021/8896408. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33564311BACKGROUNDShilpapriya M, Jayanthi M, Reddy VN, Sakthivel R, Selvaraju G, Vijayakumar P. Effectiveness of new vibration delivery system on pain associated with injection of local anesthesia in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;33(3):173-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.160343.
PMID: 26156269BACKGROUNDMelzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971-9. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971. No abstract available.
PMID: 5320816BACKGROUNDShaefer JR, Lee SJ, Anderson NK. A Vibration Device to Control Injection Discomfort. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017 Jun;38(6):e5-e8.
PMID: 28586233BACKGROUND
Related Links
- Vibrating toothbrush, ice, or topical anesthetic agent to reduce pain of local anesthetic injection in 5- to 12-year-old children undergoing dental procedures - a randomized controlled trial
- Comparison of Three Different Techniques to Allay Anxiety before Local Anesthesia Injection in Pediatric Population
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Irsam Haider, BDS, MCPS
University of Lahore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2025
First Posted
February 3, 2025
Study Start
November 28, 2024
Primary Completion
December 30, 2024
Study Completion
February 3, 2025
Last Updated
April 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The individual participant data (IPD) collected in this study will not be shared with other researchers to protect the confidentiality and privacy of the participants. Since the study involves pediatric patients, maintaining strict adherence to ethical guidelines and ensuring data security is paramount. Furthermore, the scope of this study is limited to internal analysis, and no provisions for external data sharing were included in the consent obtained from participants or their guardians