NCT06800027

Brief Summary

Antecedents: Unwanted loneliness is associated with an increased risk of anxiety, depression, social isolation, and malnutrition. The SALSA project aims to establish mechanisms and create an ecosystem that enables healthcare and social services to prescribe meals at pre-trained local restaurants. The goal is to encourage socialisation and simultaneously ensure a diet tailored to the user's needs, without stigmatisation, new infrastructure, or additional staffing. Hypotheses: Individuals experiencing unwanted loneliness with a risk of anxiety, depression, and malnutrition will improve their emotional and nutritional status, social support, and quality of life if they dine at a restaurant in a group, accompanied by a facilitator, twice a week. Objectives: To assess whether dining at a restaurant twice a week in a group, accompanied by a facilitator, and participating in healthy eating workshops improves the emotional and nutritional status, social support, and quality of life of individuals experiencing unwanted loneliness. Methodology: Design: Randomised clinical trial with two groups. Inclusion Criteria: Autonomous individuals experiencing challenges related to living alone (Z60), at risk of malnutrition or emotional disorders, with a score of ≥14 and \<28 on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), ≥10 on the Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), or ≥32 on the DUKE-UNC-11 Social Support Scale. Participants must be able to attend follow-ups over eight months, read and write in Spanish or Catalan, and dine at a restaurant twice a week. Measurements: Sociodemographic variables, assessments of depression, anxiety, social support, quality of life, and clinical variables such as weight, height, body mass index, blood pressure, haemogram and formula, glycated haemoglobin, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides, albumin, iron, ferritin, vitamin B12, and folate. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet, intervention satisfaction and compliance, and the number of primary care visits will also be measured during pre-intervention (4 months), intervention (4 months), and post-intervention (4 months) periods. Confounding or effect-modifying variables will also be recorded. Statistical Analysis: Initially, the sociodemographic characteristics of both groups will be described. Percentages will be used for qualitative variables, and means with standard deviations or medians with ranges and interquartile ranges (25-75) for quantitative variables. Baseline scores on selected scales will be compared post-randomisation to ensure no significant differences. Post-intervention, mean scores across scales and variables will be compared for each group independently and for different post-intervention time periods using paired Student's t-tests (for normally distributed data) or Mann-Whitney U tests (for non-normal distributions). Secondary analyses will include multiple regression, incorporating sociodemographic and confounding variables, to assess clinical remission of depression (Yes: Beck scale \<12), anxiety (Yes: GAD-7 \<10), and social support (Yes: DUKE-UNC-11 \>32). Expected Results: The intervention group is expected to show improvements in emotional and nutritional status, social support, and quality of life. Applicability and Relevance: The proposed solution leverages existing infrastructure-neighbourhood restaurants, historically spaces for gathering and socialisation, which are currently under threat. These venues could become vital players in the socio-health sector, acting as nutrition caretakers for a specific group of individuals. This approach avoids the need for new canteens or facilities, instead relying on skilled professionals who already exist within the community, while also supporting local economic activity. By enabling individuals experiencing unwanted loneliness to access group dining in pre-trained restaurants, the intervention aims to improve emotional well-being through social interaction, foster better nutrition, and enhance quality of life. These benefits could result in reduced healthcare visits and less need for medication.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
98

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable depression

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable depression

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 15, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 24, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 29, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 29, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

January 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 24, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

LonelinessDepressionAnxietySocial supportQuality of life

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Depression

    Clinical remission of depression or response to the intervention at the end of the intervention. Clinical remission is defined as a Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) score \<14, and response to the intervention is defined as a decrease in the initial score

    4 months

  • Anxiety

    Clinical remission of anxiety or response to the intervention at the end of the intervention. Clinical remission is defined as a score \<10 on the GAD-7 scale (Generalized Anxiety Disorder), and response to the intervention is defined as a reduction in the baseline score

    4 months

  • Social support

    Improvement in social support after the intervention. A response to the intervention is defined by a decrease in the Duke-UNC-11 Social Support Questionnaire score, with a score \<32 indicating good social support

    4 months

  • Health-Related Quality of Life

    Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) after the intervention: an improvement in HRQoL is considered if there is a decrease in the EuroQol (EQ-5D) questionnaire score compared to the baseline.

    4 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Clinical variables

    4 months

  • Adherence to the Mediterranean diet

    4 months

  • Visits made to the primary care centre

    8 months

  • Visits made to the emergency department

    8 months

  • Referrals to the hospital

    8 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention group will dine at a selected and trained restaurant twice a week for 4 months (from March to June 2024). A facilitator will accompany the participants to the restaurant and supervise them. Once a month, a healthy habits and meal supplementation workshop will be held at the senior citizens' centre. Participants will not be required to pay for the meals at the restaurant or for participation in the workshops. In order for the restaurant to provide appropriate services tailored to the users' needs, training will be conducted by professionals from the Alicia Foundation on how to manage the nutrition of elderly individuals and other participants in the study according to their dietary needs.

Other: SALSA group intervention: Going to lunch at the restaurant in a group and attending healthy eating workshops.

Control grup

NO INTERVENTION

The control group will receive standard care at their Primary Care Centre.

Interventions

The intervention group will dine at a selected and trained restaurant twice a week for 4 months (from March to June 2024). A facilitator will accompany the participants to the restaurant and supervise them. Once a month, a healthy habits and meal supplementation workshop will be held at the senior citizens' centre. Participants will not be required to pay for the meals at the restaurant or for participation in the workshops. The control group will receive standard care at their Primary Care Centre. In order for the restaurant to provide appropriate services tailored to the users' needs, training will be conducted by professionals from the Alicia Foundation on how to manage the nutrition of elderly individuals and other participants in the study according to their dietary needs.

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Autonomous individuals experiencing issues related to living alone or feeling lonely (Z60) (e.g., elderly, migrants, those with functional diversity, etc.), at risk of malnutrition or emotional disorders, with a score of ≥14 and \<28 on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), a score of ≥10 on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale, or a score of ≥32 on the Duke-UNC-11 Social Support Scale; ability to undergo follow-up for 8 months, ability to read and write in Spanish or Catalan, and the ability to attend the restaurant twice a week.

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of dementia or moderate cognitive impairment, diagnosis of major depression (BDI-II score ≥28), alcohol or drug abuse, physical or mental impairment preventing attendance at the restaurant two or three times a week, failure to sign the informed consent form, participation in other food support programmes by social services or not being responsible for their own nutrition.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Unitat de Suport a la Recerca de la Catalunya Central, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina, Manresa, Spain

Manresa, Barcelona, 08242, Spain

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Rockwood K. What would make a definition of frailty successful? Age Ageing. 2005 Sep;34(5):432-4. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi146.

    PMID: 16107450BACKGROUND
  • Urzua M A. [Health related quality of life: Conceptual elements]. Rev Med Chil. 2010 Mar;138(3):358-65. Epub 2010 May 19. Spanish.

    PMID: 20556342BACKGROUND
  • 8. Institut d'Estadística de Catalunya. Població a 1 de gener 2023. Available online: https://www.idescat.cat/indicadors/?id=aec&n=15231 (accessed on 24 october 2023).Proyecciones de Población 2022-2072. Available online: https://www.ine.es/prensa/pp_2022_2072.pdf (accessed on 24 october 2023).

    BACKGROUND
  • Gene-Badia J, Comice P, Belchin A, Erdozain MA, Caliz L, Torres S, Rodriguez R. [Profiles of loneliness and social isolation in urban population]. Aten Primaria. 2020 Apr;52(4):224-232. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.09.012. Epub 2019 Feb 12. Spanish.

    PMID: 30770152BACKGROUND
  • Lubetkin EI, Jia H, Franks P, Gold MR. Relationship among sociodemographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population. Qual Life Res. 2005 Dec;14(10):2187-96. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-8028-5.

    PMID: 16328899BACKGROUND
  • Dent E, Wright ORL, Woo J, Hoogendijk EO. Malnutrition in older adults. Lancet. 2023 Mar 18;401(10380):951-966. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02612-5. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

    PMID: 36716756BACKGROUND
  • Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S. Older adults reporting social isolation or loneliness show poorer cognitive function 4 years later. Evid Based Nurs. 2014 Apr;17(2):59-60. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101379. Epub 2013 Jun 8. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23749730BACKGROUND
  • Nyqvist F, Nygard M, Scharf T. Loneliness amongst older people in Europe: a comparative study of welfare regimes. Eur J Ageing. 2018 Sep 6;16(2):133-143. doi: 10.1007/s10433-018-0487-y. eCollection 2019 Jun.

    PMID: 31139028BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DepressionAnxiety DisordersMalnutrition

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorMental DisordersNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PHD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2025

First Posted

January 29, 2025

Study Start

January 15, 2024

Primary Completion

July 30, 2024

Study Completion

July 30, 2024

Last Updated

January 29, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations