NCT05235789

Brief Summary

Background: Rational Emotional Behavioral Therapy (REBT) applied by the Primary Health Care (PC) Social Worker reduces psychotropic drug use and overcrowding at medical appointments. Hypothesis: The REBT in people diagnosed with mild-moderate depression in the social work consultation of PC, improves the clinical control of this disorder, with lower consumption of health resources, better quality of life and user satisfaction, with respect to the usual clinical practice, in addition to being cost-effective. Goals: To compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of REBT as an intervention tool with respect to the usual clinical practice in adults with a diagnosis of mild-moderate major depression in PC. Methodology: Randomized clinical trial with control group, in people diagnosed with major depression attached to the PC. This study is carried out in 9 primary care centers in Catalonia. Determinations: Participants are measured at the beginning of the study, end of the intervention and at 1 year of the beginning: Control of symptoms using PHQ-9; Health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L scale; Self-perceived well-being, using the Ryff Psychological Well-Being Scale; Pharmacological prescription and withdrawal of anxiolytics, hypnotics and antidepressants; Frequency of PC consultations; Assignable costs through TIC-P; Functional social support perceived prior to the intervention using the Duke questionnaire; and user satisfaction with the treatment at the end of the intervention using CRES-4. The exposure variable is the assignment to the REBT psychosocial intervention group or the usual clinical practice control group. Statistical analysis: Description of the items of the measuring instruments used per month will calculate the cost by variation of quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and the increase of associated cost-effectiveness ratio contrasting the hypothesis that this is different to 22000 € by means of t-test. Expected results: REBT in people diagnosed with mild-moderate depression in the social work consultation of PC, will improve in the clinical control of this disorder, a lower consumption of health resources, improvement in the Quality of Life and in the user satisfaction. Therefore, REBT is effective, and cost-effective in managing people diagnosed with mild-moderate major depression. Applicability and Relevance: REBT will help people to acquire tools to deal with difficulties in daily life and provide economic savings in health care costs.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
900

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable depression

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable depression

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 13, 2021

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 10, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 11, 2022

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2023

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 20, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

December 13, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 17, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Effectivenesscost effectivenessrational behavioral emotional therapydepressionclinical trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (17)

  • Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    The PHQ-9 questionnaire consists of 9 items that assess the presence of depressive symptoms (corresponding to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders -DSM-IV-) in the last 2 weeks, according to frequency: 0 = "never", 1 = "some days", 2 = "more than half the days "and 3 =" almost every day "; allows a classification in "Major Depressive Syndrome", "Other Depressive Syndromes", "Positive Depressive Symptoms" or "Negative Depressive Symptoms". However, in the present study we will use the total score (unweighted summation of item scores) as a measure of depressive symptoms.

    It will be measured as baseline.

  • Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    The PHQ-9 questionnaire consists of 9 items that assess the presence of depressive symptoms (corresponding to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders -DSM-IV-) in the last 2 weeks, according to frequency: 0 = "never", 1 = "some days", 2 = "more than half the days "and 3 =" almost every day "; allows a classification in "Major Depressive Syndrome", "Other Depressive Syndromes", "Positive Depressive Symptoms" or "Negative Depressive Symptoms". However, in the present study we will use the total score (unweighted summation of item scores) as a measure of depressive symptoms.

    It will be measured at 4 months from baseline.

  • Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    The PHQ-9 questionnaire consists of 9 items that assess the presence of depressive symptoms (corresponding to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders -DSM-IV-) in the last 2 weeks, according to frequency: 0 = "never", 1 = "some days", 2 = "more than half the days "and 3 =" almost every day "; allows a classification in "Major Depressive Syndrome", "Other Depressive Syndromes", "Positive Depressive Symptoms" or "Negative Depressive Symptoms". However, in the present study we will use the total score (unweighted summation of item scores) as a measure of depressive symptoms.

    It will be measured at 1 year from baseline.

  • 5-Dimensional, 5-Level EuroQol Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

    The EuroQol 5D5L questionnaire contains an Analog Visual Scale, and 5 items / dimensions (mobility, personal care, daily activities, pain / discomfort and anxiety / depression), rated at 5 levels ("No problems", "mild problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems" and "extreme problems or incapable of") . The final profit index will be calculated using the standardized hybrid method (compound time equivalence / discrete choice experiments) of Spanish social preferences.

    It will be measured as baseline.

  • 5-Dimensional, 5-Level EuroQol Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

    The EuroQol 5D5L questionnaire contains an Analog Visual Scale, and 5 items / dimensions (mobility, personal care, daily activities, pain / discomfort and anxiety / depression), rated at 5 levels ("No problems", "mild problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems" and "extreme problems or incapable of") . The final profit index will be calculated using the standardized hybrid method (compound time equivalence / discrete choice experiments) of Spanish social preferences.

    It will be measured at 4 months from baseline.

  • 5-Dimensional, 5-Level EuroQol Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

    The EuroQol 5D5L questionnaire contains an Analog Visual Scale, and 5 items / dimensions (mobility, personal care, daily activities, pain / discomfort and anxiety / depression), rated at 5 levels ("No problems", "mild problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems" and "extreme problems or incapable of") . The final profit index will be calculated using the standardized hybrid method (compound time equivalence / discrete choice experiments) of Spanish social preferences.

    It will be measured at 1 year from baseline.

  • Scale of Psychological Well-Being (Ryff, 1989).

    Reduced self-perceived well-being questionnaire of 29 items, subdivided into 6 dimensions with statements about Self-Acceptance, Positive Relationships, Autonomy, Mastery of the Environment, Personal Growth and Purpose in Life. It uses a 6-point likert scale where 1 strongly agrees and 6 strongly disagrees. The final results will be by dimensions.

    It will be measured as baseline.

  • Scale of Psychological Well-Being (Ryff, 1989).

    Reduced self-perceived well-being questionnaire of 29 items, subdivided into 6 dimensions with statements about Self-Acceptance, Positive Relationships, Autonomy, Mastery of the Environment, Personal Growth and Purpose in Life. It uses a 6-point likert scale where 1 strongly agrees and 6 strongly disagrees. The final results will be by dimensions.

    It will be measured at 4 months from baseline.

  • Scale of Psychological Well-Being (Ryff, 1989).

    Reduced self-perceived well-being questionnaire of 29 items, subdivided into 6 dimensions with statements about Self-Acceptance, Positive Relationships, Autonomy, Mastery of the Environment, Personal Growth and Purpose in Life. It uses a 6-point likert scale where 1 strongly agrees and 6 strongly disagrees. The final results will be by dimensions.

    It will be measured at 1 year from baseline.

  • Treatment Inventory Cost in Psychiatric patients (TIC-P)

    The TIC-P questionnaire includes 8 general questions, costs in two dimensions: use of health resources (direct costs, 35 questions) and loss of productivity (indirect costs, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA) Productivity Cost Questionnaire -iPCQ-, 12 questions).

    It will be measured as baseline.

  • Treatment Inventory Cost in Psychiatric patients (TIC-P)

    The TIC-P questionnaire includes 8 general questions, costs in two dimensions: use of health resources (direct costs, 35 questions) and loss of productivity (indirect costs, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA) Productivity Cost Questionnaire -iPCQ-, 12 questions).

    It will be measured at 4 months from baseline.

  • Treatment Inventory Cost in Psychiatric patients (TIC-P)

    The TIC-P questionnaire includes 8 general questions, costs in two dimensions: use of health resources (direct costs, 35 questions) and loss of productivity (indirect costs, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA) Productivity Cost Questionnaire -iPCQ-, 12 questions).

    It will be measured at 1 year from baseline.

  • Attendance of primary care during the previous year.

    Number of scheduled PC visits (both face-to-face and telephone) for physician / social worker / nurse, in the year prior to the start of the study, and at the end of follow-up.

    It will be measured as baseline.

  • Attendance of primary care during the previous year.

    Number of scheduled PC visits (both face-to-face and telephone) for physician / social worker / nurse, in the year prior to the start of the study, and at the end of follow-up.

    It will be measured at baseline.

  • Attendance of primary care during the previous year.

    Number of scheduled PC visits (both face-to-face and telephone) for physician / social worker / nurse, in the year prior to the start of the study, and at the end of follow-up.

    It will be measured at 1 year from baseline.

  • Duke Functional Social Support Questionnaire.

    The Duke Functional Social Support Questionnaire consists of 11 Likert-type items from 1 ("much less than I want") to 5 ("as much as I want"). It measures perceived social support and has two dimensions: "confidential social support" and "affective social support".

    It will be measured at 4 months from baseline.

  • Satisfaction Scale with the treatment received (CRES-4).

    The CRES-4 scale measures 4 items likert: satisfaction with treatment (rated 0-5; "completely dissatisfied" and "completely satisfied, respectively), degree of resolution (0-5), previous emotional state (0-4), current emotional state (0-4). Three dimensions are derived from 0 (worst rating) to 100 (best rating): satisfaction, problem solving, and perception of emotional change.

    It will be measured at 4 months from baseline.

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

The social workers in each center of primary care held eight 30 minutes sessions fortnightly of Rational-Emotive-Behavioral Therapy. First session is informative about the type of treatment to be performed. The next sessions work events, thoughts and feelings with the goal of changing the dysfunctional thoughts by other more rational ones, measured by scales.

Other: Rational-Emotive-Behavioral Therapy

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The control group (GC) in each center of primary care will take the usual medical care for depression, according with up-dated national and international guidelines.

Other: Control Group usual care

Interventions

The structure of the REBT sessions includes the following points: 1. Determine specific goals that explain what the participant want to achieve through the content of the session. 2. Explain the level of skills to be achieved in each session. 3. Development of the session, reminder of the previous session, review of homework (from the second session to the 8th). Irrational beliefs and disruptive thoughts will be worked on together with the participant in order to achieve an improvement in their emotional state. Key messages with healthier alternatives that make your daily life easier. 4. Establishing homework. Using the REBT Toolbox with Key Messages. 5. Individual psychosocial work will be recorded in the computerized medical history.

Also known as: Cognitive-Emotive-Behavioral Therapy, REBT, CBT, REBT-CBT
Intervention group

In the control group, for each center , the depression is treated as usual with the conventional treatment, according to national and international guidelines.

Also known as: conventional treatment, usual care
Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients treated at the primary care medical consultation , who signed the Informed Consent, with:
  • first diagnosis of mild (F32.0)
  • moderate major depression (F32.1, F32.9 (unspecified depression).

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants diagnosed with severe depression F32.2, psychotic major depression F32.3, moderate recurrent depression F33.1, severe recurrent depression F33.2 or Beck test\> 30 points at baseline visit
  • Any other type of psychiatric pathology (F60.9 personality disorder, F20.9 schizophrenia, F42.9 obsessive compulsive disorder, F20.0 paranoid schizophrenia, F31.9 bipolar disorder, F43.10 post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder F42.9.
  • Impaired cognitive ability according to PFEIFFER SPMSQ Scale (Short Portable Mental State Questionnaire) (\<3 points)
  • Dementia - presenile dementia - senile dementia (F03.90). All three share code, dementia Sclerotic artery - vascular dementia - multiinfarct dementia (F01.50). All three share code. Alzheimer's disease (G30) and Lewy body dementia (G31.89)
  • Person included in home care (Z74.9)
  • The unwillingness to treat.
  • Participation in psychoeducational groups of the Catalan Institute of Health ("Institut Català de la Salut" -ICS-), or other individual or group psychological therapies.
  • Any pathology or circumstance that makes it impossible for the user to participate in the study and / or the follow-up required by the same:
  • Terminal illnesses, (life expectancy of less than one year according to ECAP); Advanced Chronic Diseases (MACA in the section on chronicity in the ECAP)
  • Illiteracy and / or language barrier
  • Deaths and transfers from the generation of the recruitment list from the beginning of the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Catalan Health Institute. ABS Sant Andreu 9D

Barcelona, 08030, Spain

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Carme Rovira Aler, LCSW

    Catalan Institute of Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Carme Rovira Aler, LCSW

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized clinical trial with control group, in people diagnosed with major depression attached to the PC. This study is carried out in 9 primary care centers in Catalonia.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2021

First Posted

February 11, 2022

Study Start

January 10, 2022

Primary Completion

August 1, 2023

Study Completion

January 1, 2025

Last Updated

March 20, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Locations