Comparison of RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG Techniques in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized, double-blind, single-center clinical trial was divided into two groups, RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG, according to the surgical method. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of the RIMA-SVG surgical method in improving saphenous vein graft (SVG) patency and reducing clinical complications. A total of 300 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to two surgical method groups: RIMA-SVG Group (150 patients): SVGs are connected to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA). Ao-SVG Group (150 patients): The aorta is clamped, and SVGs are connected to the ascending aorta (Ao).All patients will undergo CABG on a beating heart with sequential vein grafts to bypass at least two or more coronary vessels. The primary outcome is 1-year graft patency. The secondary outcomes include neurological complications, mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and surgical site infection event.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2026
August 6, 2025
August 1, 2025
1.3 years
January 16, 2025
August 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
1-Year Graft Patency
The patency of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) will be assessed 1 year post-surgery using coronary CT angiography
1 year post-surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Perioperative complications
2 weeks post-surgery
Neurological Complications
1 year post-surgery
All-Cause Mortality
1 year post-surgery
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
1 year post-surgery
Surgical site infection event
1 year post-surgery
Study Arms (2)
RIMA-SVG Group
EXPERIMENTALSaphenous vein grafts (SVGs) will be connected to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA).
Ao-SVG Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSVGs will be connected directly to the ascending aorta.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18 to 80 years.
- Scheduled for their first planned coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with at least two sequential saphenous vein grafts (SVGs).
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to provide written informed consent.
- Patients requiring other cardiac surgeries (e.g. valve replacement, congenital heart defect surgery, or aortic dissection repair).
- Patients with severe stenosis of the left or right subclavian artery.
- Patients for whom aortic clamping is infeasible due to calcification of the ascending aorta.
- Patients with bilateral SVG varicosities unsuitable for grafting.
- Patients with active malignancy.
- Patients with active bleeding or a history of bleeding tendency.
- Patients with previous intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke within 14 days preoperatively, or severe carotid artery stenosis.
- Patients with severe hepatic dysfunction.
- Patients requiring emergency surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
the Second Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, 130000, China
Related Publications (1)
Wei R, Huang M, Jiang N, Zhang R, He T, Zhu C, Wang W, Piao H, Yu S, Zhu Z, Wang T, Liu K. RIMA-SVG versus Ao-SVG in coronary artery bypass grafting: protocol for a prospective, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority and single-centre trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 28;15(9):e104578. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104578.
PMID: 41022447DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
kexiang liu, Ph.D.
Second Hospital of Jilin University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The surgical team is unblinded during the procedure, but patients and investigators remain blinded throughout the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2025
First Posted
January 22, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2026
Last Updated
August 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be shared via request from the corresponding author starting 6 months after study completion and publication.
- Access Criteria
- Access to the de-identified individual participant data will be granted to qualified researchers whose proposed use of the data has been reviewed and approved by the trial's principal investigator and data access committee. Applicants must submit a detailed research proposal outlining the scientific rationale, intended analyses, and data protection measures. A data use agreement must be signed prior to data release to ensure compliance with ethical and legal standards.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the primary and secondary outcomes of the study-including baseline characteristics, graft patency results, perioperative complications, and 12-month clinical outcomes-will be made available upon reasonable request. Data will be shared with qualified researchers following study completion and publication, subject to approval by the trial steering committee and in accordance with ethical and data protection guidelines.