Home-Based Versus Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation After CABG Surgery
Efficacy of Home-Based Telerehabilitation Versus Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation on Cardiopulmonary Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the efficacy of a 12-week home-based telerehabilitation (HBTCR) program against traditional center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) and usual care in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The primary goal was to assess changes in cardiopulmonary function, measured by peak oxygen consumption (VO₂ peak), and exercise capacity, measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), to determine if HBTCR is a viable alternative to CBCR.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Sep 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2025
CompletedNovember 21, 2025
October 1, 2025
1 year
November 14, 2025
November 19, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Peak Oxygen Consumption (VO₂ peak)
Measured in mL/kg/min by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on a treadmill using a symptom-limited protocol. The change from baseline to 12 weeks was assessed.
Baseline, 12 weeks
Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
Measured in meters, assessing the maximum distance a patient can walk in 6 minutes on a flat, hard surface. The change from baseline to 12 weeks was assessed.
Baseline, 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second to Forced Vital Capacity Ratio (FEV1/FVC)
Baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Psychological Status (Anxiety)
Baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Psychological Status (Depression)
Baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Quality of Life
Baseline, 12 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Home-Based Telerehabilitation (HBTCR) Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received a personalized 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program to perform at home. They were provided with a wearable heart rate monitor and used a mobile application to log their exercise sessions and vital signs. A rehabilitation team remotely monitored their progress and communicated weekly via phone or video call.
Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR) Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants attended supervised cardiac rehabilitation sessions at the hospital's rehabilitation center three times per week for 12 weeks. Each session included warm-up, aerobic exercise, resistance training, and cool-down under the direct supervision of a healthcare team.
Control Group
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants received usual care, which included routine follow-up appointments and standard health education delivered through verbal instructions and printed pamphlets. They did not participate in a structured or monitored exercise program.
Interventions
A 12-week comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program. The exercise prescription (frequency, intensity, duration, type) was based on a baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test, typically starting at 40-60% of heart rate reserve and increasing progressively. The program included aerobic and resistance training components. This intervention was delivered either remotely (HBTCR group) or in-person (CBCR group), three times per week.
Participants received routine follow-up and standard health education pamphlets covering topics such as medication adherence, diet, and general advice on physical activity, without a structured or monitored exercise plan.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 30 to 75 years.
- Had undergone Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) 4 to 8 weeks prior.
- In a stable clinical condition.
- Able to provide written informed consent.
- No cognitive impairments.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute decompensated heart failure.
- Severe physical comorbidities (e.g., fractures, severe hearing impairment) that would preclude participation in an exercise program.
- Recent stroke or pulmonary embolism.
- Significant hepatic or renal dysfunction.
- Unstable angina.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2025
First Posted
November 21, 2025
Study Start
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10