Comparing Objective and Subjective Physical Activity Assessments in Obese Patients
OSPAA
Objective vs. Subjective Physical Activity Assessment in a Clinical Setting of Patients With Obesity and Comorbid Eating Disorders
1 other identifier
observational
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to analyze the validity of self-reported physical activities in obese patients with psychosomatic disorders in a clinical setting. The main question aims to answer: \- How valid are self-reported physical activity data (via the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, IPAQ-SF) compared to actigraphy-based objective measurements (using the SenseWear® armband, SWA)? Between 2020 and 2022, 23 patients with obesity (21 anorexia nervosa, 2 bulimia nervosa) were recruited from an Austrian psychosomatic clinic. Receiving routine care, participants were additionally asked to
- wear the SWA for seven days in the clinic
- complete the IPAQ-SF for the same reference period on the first weekday after SWA wearing time The study then statistically compared total physical activity, measured in so called metabolic equivalents (MET minutes per week), and sitting time (minutes per day) between the two methods to determine the accuracy of the self-reported data.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started May 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2025
CompletedJanuary 24, 2025
January 1, 2025
1.9 years
January 9, 2025
January 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
MET (Metabolic equivalents) - Objective measure of physical activity in MET min/week (by SWA)
The lightweight (83 g) SenseWear® Armband Pro 3 (Bodymedia, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA) is a multisensory device that includes a two-axis accelerometer, as well as sensors to measure galvanic skin responses, skin and ambient temperature or heat flux. The monitor was initialized based patient's gender, age, weight and height, and was adjusted to fit on the triceps muscle, halfway between the acromion and olecranon processes of the dominant arm. A proprietary algorithm converts raw data into estimates of total and active energy expenditure, resting metabolic rate, metabolic units, total number of steps, duration of physical activity, duration of sleep and resting time. Data are expressed both in kcal·min-1 and metabolic equivalents (METs). The time of physical activity is categorized into different ranges based on the metabolic equivalent (MET). Values \<3 MET are classified as low, METs between 3 and 6 as moderate values ≥6 MET as vigorous activity.
Period: SWA was worn for at least four days within week 3 or week 4 of clinical stay
MET (Metabolic equivalent) - Subjective measure of physical activity in MET min/week (by IPAQ self-report)
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) provides a standardized measure of physical activity for individuals across different populations. The most used short form consists of seven items that assess physical activity (frequency, duration) over the past seven days, categorizing it into four types: vigorous intensity, moderate intensity, walking, and sitting. An average metabolic equivalents score (MET, min·w-1) was calculated to assess total physical activity as well as for each type of activity, separately. For walking activities, all types of walking were included and an average MET score was derived. The same procedure was carried out for medium intensity and high intensity activities. By calculating the number of activity days multiplied by the average duration per activity, statements about the energy consumption per week and the fitness level can be derived. The last seven days in which the SWA was worn were used as the reference period.
Single time point: Retrospective self-report on the first weekday after SWA wearing time
Study Arms (1)
Obese patients with anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa
Patients admitted during the study period were eligible if they were ≥ 18 years old, had a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30, could read and speak German, had a diagnosis of an eating disorder (ICD-10: F50.9 unspecified eating disorder, F50.2 bulimia nervosa), had a clinical stay of at least 4 weeks, and wore the SWA for at least 18 h·d-1, including at least 4 days with one weekend day. Participant characteristics were as follows: Sex (f/m) 23 (17/6) Age (f/m) 42.1 ± 13.6 BMI (kg·m-2) 40,5 ± 5.7 Body fat (%) 43.5 ± 6.8 Sleep efficiency 81 ± 8 SWA wearing time 1400 ± 43 Activity in min (\>3 MET) 94 ± 37 Steps 9935 ± 3050 Clinical stay (d) 61 ± 16 Eating disorders Eating disorder, F50.9 (%) 91 Bulimia nervosa, F50.2 (%) 9 Psychosomatic disorders Depression, F33 (%) 26 Personality disorders, F60 (%) 17 Neurotic disorders, F4 (%) 30 Bipolar disorders F31 (%) 4
Eligibility Criteria
23 patients at the Psychosomatic Clinic in Eggenburg (Austria) from May 2020 to March 2022 were recruited. Patients received standardized instructions about the study's purpose and the use of the SWA and IPAQ-SF. During the first two weeks, they followed standard clinic therapies, including exercise. Body fat was measured before activity monitoring began. The SWA was provided during week three or four, with instructions on use and activity logging. Patients also completed the IPAQ-SF for the prior week. They were advised to maintain normal activity patterns and record non-wearing periods. Blinding was not feasible. Patients provided written informed consent to participate and for the use of their data in research. The patients were informed in detail about the study procedures. Participants took part in the study voluntarily and had the option of withdrawing at any time. Their privacy and rights were carefully protected throughout the study..
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 years old
- body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30
- could read and speak German
- had a diagnosis of an eating disorder (ICD-10: F50.9 unspecified eating disorder, F50.2 bulimia nervosa)
- had a clinical stay of at least 4 weeks
- wore the SWA for at least 18 h·d-1, (41) including at least 4 days with one weekend day
You may not qualify if:
- inability to walk independently
- a nickel allergy
- valid wearing time of accelerometer
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Psychosomatic Clinic Eggenburg
Eggenburg, Lower Austria, 3730, Austria
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hans-Peter Wiesinger, PhD
Paracelsus Medical University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elmar Kaiser, Dr. med., Chief physician
Psychosomatic Clinic Eggenburg
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bettina Bannert, MA
Psychosomatic Clinic Eggenburg
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ass. Prof. Mag. Dr. Patrick Kutschar
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2025
First Posted
January 20, 2025
Study Start
May 1, 2020
Primary Completion
March 30, 2022
Study Completion
March 30, 2022
Last Updated
January 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01