Comparison of Erector Spina Plane Block and Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Analgesia After Thoracotomy
Clinical Research Ethic Committee of Gaziantep University
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in patients undergoing thoracotomy. The primary outcome is the VAS scores assessed at postoperative hours 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 for pain at rest. The secondary outcome was tramadol and morphine consumption.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2025
CompletedJanuary 16, 2025
January 1, 2025
7 months
January 10, 2025
January 10, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog Scale
Visual analog scale, is one of the pain rating scales, providing a range of scores from 0-100.
Postoperative 0., 3., 6., 12., ve 24. hour
Secondary Outcomes (1)
side effects
Postoperative 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
erector spinae block group
OTHERparavertebral block group
OTHERInterventions
Nerve block for providing analgesia after thoracotomy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who had undergone thoracotomy, with ASA I,II,III physical status and received ESP block or paravertebral block
You may not qualify if:
- Patients were excluded from the study if they were emergency cases, had an ASA class IV or V status, had peripheral vascular disease, were pregnant, had heart failure, were allergic to local anesthetics, or if their medical records were inaccessible.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Elzem SENlead
Study Sites (1)
Gaziantep University
Gaziantep, 27410, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Elzem Sen, Assoc. Prof
University of Gaziantep
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc.Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2025
First Posted
January 16, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2020
Primary Completion
May 1, 2021
Study Completion
May 31, 2021
Last Updated
January 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share