Combining Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation and Activity-based Training in Inpatient Rehabilitation to Facilitate Upper Limb Function of Individuals with Acute to Subacute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Establishing the Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation with Activity-based Training for Upper Extremity Function Recovery in Individuals with Acute to Subacute Tetraplegia
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to understand the safety and practicality of using spinal cord transcutaneous (through the skin) stimulation in an inpatient setting as well as how the combination of activity-based training (ABT) and spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) can improve participants' ability to use their hands, arms, and trunk in an inpatient rehabilitation program. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is the combination of spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation and ABT is safe and practical when applied to individuals with acute to subacute cervical SCI during inpatient rehabilitation?
- How the combined intervention can improve hand and arm function when applied to those individuals? The investigators will assess the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of the combined intervention and compare to a sham control (sham stimulation combined with ABT) and a ABT only group to see if the combined intervention can lead to greater function recovery. Participants will:
- Receive one type of the three intervention (scTS+ABT, sham scTS+ABT, or ABT only) for 10 sessions with 30 mins/session over 2 weeks.
- Receive assessment before, during, and immediately after the intervention, and at 1-month, 2-month, and 3-month follow-up visits.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJanuary 14, 2025
January 1, 2025
1.6 years
January 2, 2025
January 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change of pain before and after daily intervention
Subjects will be asked to rate their pain intensity using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (i.e. 0-10), before and after each intervention session. The change in pain will be documented.
From the beginning to the end of each intervention session at 30 minutes
Change of skin integrity before and after daily intervention session
Skin integrity under electrode placement site will be assessed by a clinician before and after each session, any change i.e., redness, swelling, breakdown, will be recorded.
From the beginning to the end of each intervention session at 30 minutes
Study completion rate
Study completion rate will be calculated at post-intervention by dividing the number of participants who will be present at these time points by the number of individuals who are enrolled and begin the intervention.
From enrollment to the post-intervention assessment at 3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Adverse event after daily intervention session
At the end of each intervention session at 30 minutes
Change of Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP) Scores
From baseline to the end of intervention at 2 weeks, post-intervention at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Change of voluntary handgrip forces
From baseline to the end of intervention at 2 weeks, post-intervention at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Change of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) Scores
From baseline to the end of intervention at 2 weeks, post-intervention at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Other Outcomes (2)
Change of cortical excitability before and after intervention
From baseline to the post-intervention at 3 weeks
Change of spinal excitability before and after intervention
From baseline to the post-intervention at 3 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Active Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation Combined with Activity-based Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive activity-based training (ABT) while receiving concomitant, active spinal stimulation (scTS) applied at the cervical and thoracic spinal segments over the dorsal skin with optimized and customized stimulation parameters. Round self-adhesive electrodes will be placed over the skin at the midline of spinous processes as cathodes and a pair of rectangular anodes electrodes will be placed over the anterior iliac crests of the pelvis. The stimulation waveform is rectangular pulse with 1-ms duration filled with a carrier frequency of 5kHz. Target simulation will be sub-threshold for UE muscle activation and verified by the absence of visible muscle contraction. The stimulation parameters will be adjusted as needed throughout the intervention course based on the participant's performance and comfort level. The intervention will be administered over 2 consecutive weeks, for 30mins/session and 5 sessions/week, as a part of their daily 3-hour therapy.
Sham Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation Combined with Activity-based Training
SHAM COMPARATORThe sham-control group will go through ABT paired with sham stimulation to control for placebo effects associated with the perception of scTS. Stimulation will be delivered at one cervical location. No stimulation mapping procedure will be performed. During the training session, the stimulation intensity will be briefly ramped up to a level at which the participants report perceiving the stimulation, and then ramped down to 0mA at both the start and the end of session. The stimulator and electrodes will remain attached to the participant while receiving ABT training. The intervention will be administered over 2 consecutive weeks, for 30mins/session and 5 sessions/week, as a part of their daily 3-hour therapy.
Activity-based Training Only
OTHERParticipants in ABT group will receive ABT only. ABT will concentrate on activities of gross UE movement, grasping, pinching, gross and fine motor skill. The hand grasp task will focus on grasping objects with different shapes and weights (i.e. weighted container and tennis ball) and placing/removing them from small storage container; the pinch task involves picking up, translating, and releasing small objects with varied sizes (i.e. blocks, dices, marble balls, nuts, etc.). The training therapist selects tasks based on participant's level of impairment and individual goals. The dosage of ABT will be 30 minutes/session, with approximately 15 minutes allocated on each side.
Interventions
Participants will receive activity-based training (ABT) while receiving concomitant, active spinal stimulation (scTS) applied at the cervical and thoracic spinal segments over the dorsal skin with optimized and customized stimulation parameters. Round self-adhesive electrodes will be placed over the skin at the midline of spinous processes as cathodes and a pair of rectangular anodes electrodes will be placed over the anterior iliac crests of the pelvis. The stimulation waveform is rectangular pulse with 1-ms duration filled with a carrier frequency of 5kHz. Target simulation will be sub-threshold for UE muscle activation and verified by the absence of visible muscle contraction. The stimulation parameters will be adjusted as needed throughout the intervention course based on the participant's performance and comfort level. The intervention will be administered over 2 consecutive weeks, for 30mins/session and 5 sessions/week, as a part of their daily 3-hour therapy.
The sham-control group will go through ABT paired with sham stimulation to control for placebo effects associated with the perception of scTS. Stimulation will be delivered at one cervical location. No stimulation mapping procedure will be performed. During the training session, the stimulation intensity will be briefly ramped up to a level at which the participants report perceiving the stimulation, and then ramped down to 0mA at both the start and the end of session. The stimulator and electrodes will remain attached to the participant while receiving ABT training. The intervention will be administered over 2 consecutive weeks, for 30mins/session and 5 sessions/week, as a part of their daily 3-hour therapy.
articipants in ABT group will receive ABT only. ABT will concentrate on activities of gross UE movement, grasping, pinching, gross and fine motor skill. The hand grasp task will focus on grasping objects with different shapes and weights (i.e. weighted container and tennis ball) and placing/removing them from small storage container; the pinch task involves picking up, translating, and releasing small objects with varied sizes (i.e. blocks, dices, marble balls, nuts, etc.). The training therapist selects tasks based on participant's level of impairment and individual goals. The dosage of ABT will be 30 minutes/session, with approximately 15 minutes allocated on each side.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- must be at least 18 years of age.
- must have had a spinal cord injury for less than or equal to 8 weeks.
- must have a traumatic cervical SCI with lesions (AIS A or B, C5-C7).
- must have some degree of motor dysfunction in the hand (bilateral UE motor score \<25).
- must be medically stable enough to participate in activity-based recovery training.
- must be able to tolerate spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation, as determined by study staff.
- must have ability to understand and the willingness to sign an informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- have a history of seizures, head trauma and/or cognitive deficit
- have surgically implanted foreign bodies such as a pacemaker, metal plate in the skull, and metal inside the skull
- have a pressure sore or skin issues.
- have severe spasticity.
- in medically unstable condition.
- have a history of illicit drug abuse.
- have a history of medical disorders of my heart, lungs, bladder, kidneys or other parts of my body that are unrelated to my spinal cord injury.
- unable or unwilling to wean from anti-spasticity medication (for an example: baclofen, Xeomin, and Lioresal).
- unable to meet the attendance requirements.
- currently enrolled in another interventional research study.
- unable to follow instructions and maintain alertness during assessments and training.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kessler Foundation
West Orange, New Jersey, 07052, United States
Related Publications (10)
de Freitas RM, Sasaki A, Sayenko DG, Masugi Y, Nomura T, Nakazawa K, Milosevic M. Selectivity and excitability of upper-limb muscle activation during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Aug 1;131(2):746-759. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00132.2021. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
PMID: 34138648BACKGROUNDGerasimenko YP, Lu DC, Modaber M, Zdunowski S, Gad P, Sayenko DG, Morikawa E, Haakana P, Ferguson AR, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 15;32(24):1968-80. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4008. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
PMID: 26077679BACKGROUNDPopovic MR, Kapadia N, Zivanovic V, Furlan JC, Craven BC, McGillivray C. Functional electrical stimulation therapy of voluntary grasping versus only conventional rehabilitation for patients with subacute incomplete tetraplegia: a randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Jun;25(5):433-42. doi: 10.1177/1545968310392924. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
PMID: 21304020BACKGROUNDKloosterman MG, Snoek GJ, Jannink MJ. Systematic review of the effects of exercise therapy on the upper extremity of patients with spinal-cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009 Mar;47(3):196-203. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.113. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
PMID: 18825160BACKGROUNDBurns AS, Marino RJ, Kalsi-Ryan S, Middleton JW, Tetreault LA, Dettori JR, Mihalovich KE, Fehlings MG. Type and Timing of Rehabilitation Following Acute and Subacute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review. Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):175S-194S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217703084. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
PMID: 29164023BACKGROUNDSnoek GJ, IJzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Maxwell D, Biering-Sorensen F. Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord. 2004 Sep;42(9):526-32. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101638.
PMID: 15224087BACKGROUNDZhang F, Momeni K, Ramanujam A, Ravi M, Carnahan J, Kirshblum S, Forrest GF. Cervical Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation Improves Upper Extremity and Hand Function in People With Complete Tetraplegia: A Case Study. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020 Dec;28(12):3167-3174. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3048592. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
PMID: 33382659BACKGROUNDFreyvert Y, Yong NA, Morikawa E, Zdunowski S, Sarino ME, Gerasimenko Y, Edgerton VR, Lu DC. Engaging cervical spinal circuitry with non-invasive spinal stimulation and buspirone to restore hand function in chronic motor complete patients. Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 19;8(1):15546. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33123-5.
PMID: 30341390BACKGROUNDGad P, Lee S, Terrafranca N, Zhong H, Turner A, Gerasimenko Y, Edgerton VR. Non-Invasive Activation of Cervical Spinal Networks after Severe Paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2018 Sep 15;35(18):2145-2158. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5461.
PMID: 29649928BACKGROUNDInanici F, Samejima S, Gad P, Edgerton VR, Hofstetter CP, Moritz CT. Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Stimulation Promotes Long-Term Recovery of Upper Extremity Function in Chronic Tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018 Jun;26(6):1272-1278. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2834339.
PMID: 29877852BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Gail Forrest, PhD
Kessler Foundation
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 2, 2025
First Posted
January 14, 2025
Study Start
April 8, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
January 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share