NCT03239301

Brief Summary

Study design: Controlled Trial Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of robotic-assisted training of forearm and hand functions in spinal cord injury patients Setting: Ankara Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Turkey Methods: Forty patients were allocated into robotic and control groups. Both groups received conventional rehabilitation program for four weeks. Moreover, robotic group received robotic rehabilitation program tailored to the patient five times a week (each session of 30 min). Baseline data and post-intervention data was compared.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 31, 2017

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 4, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

August 4, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

July 31, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 1, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Functional Independence Measure

    Scale Evaluating the Functionality

    Four weeks

  • Spinal Cord Independence Measure III

    Scale Evaluating the Functionality and independence

    Four weeks

  • Short Form-36

    Scale Evaluation the activities of daily living

    Four weeks

Study Arms (2)

Conventional Rehabilitation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional rehabilitation program consisted range of motion (ROM) exercises, balance and coordination training, progressive resistive exercises, posture training, gait training, and occupational therapy as much as the patients tolerated. Conventional rehabilitation was tailored to the patient considering his requires and expectancies.

Procedure: Conventional Rehabilitation

Robotic Rehabilitation + Conventional Rehab

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Armeo Spring HocomAG Inc. (Volketswil, Switzerland) device was used in robot assisted upper limb rehabilitation program. A

Procedure: Conventional RehabilitationProcedure: Robotic REhabilitation

Interventions

Conventional rehabilitation program consisted range of motion (ROM) exercises, balance and coordination training, progressive resistive exercises, posture training, gait training, and occupational therapy as much as the patients tolerated. Conventional rehabilitation was tailored to the patient considering his requires and expectancies.

Conventional RehabilitationRobotic Rehabilitation + Conventional Rehab

The Armeo Spring HocomAG Inc. (Volketswil, Switzerland) device was used in robot assisted upper limb rehabilitation program. Assistive component of the robotic arm was adjusted in accordance with motor level of each patient. Variety and difficulty of games were chosen according to the ability and functional status of the patients. Variety and difficulty level of the games were modified according to progress of patients by the same physiotherapist.

Robotic Rehabilitation + Conventional Rehab

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ages between 18-50
  • Cervical Level of Spinal Cord Injury

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe upper extremity contractures in the joints
  • Intensive spasticity (Ashworth 3-4)
  • Shoulder pain that causes exercise intolerance

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Ankara Fizik Tedavi ve REhabilitasyon Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi

Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Ankara Physical MEdicine and REhabilitation Trainign and Research Hospital

Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical Doctor, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Specialist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2017

First Posted

August 4, 2017

Study Start

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion

August 1, 2017

Study Completion

August 1, 2017

Last Updated

August 4, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08

Locations