NCT04142814

Brief Summary

In tetraplegic patients with complete cervical spinal cord injury, respiratory complications are very frequent, especially in the sub-acute phase: the lungs often become obstructed due to the accumulation of secretions and the contemporary inefficiency of the cough mechanism. The present pilot study aims, in the context of a rehabilitative Critical Care Unit, at evaluating a not yet published method, called "T-PEP" and based on the principle of Positive Expiratory Pressure, applicable to tracheotomised and mechanically ventilated patients. This method, conceptually simple and low cost, is compared with a known method based on the principle of Percussive Intrapulmonary Ventilation (IPV). Safety and efficacy issues are covered.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 22, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 29, 2019

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2022

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 28, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

October 22, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 20, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Lower respiratory airways clearanceDeep lung clearanceSecretions overproductionPositive Expiratory PressureIntrapulmonary Percussive VentilationTetraplegiaTracheotomyCritical Care UnitMechanical ventilationRespiratory physiotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of adverse events

    Incidence of adverse events in the treatment period and during the subsequent follow-up, directly correlated with the lower airways cleaning treatments under investigation

    Through the whole period of clearance treatment to attain a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation (whole period length is 2 weeks on average) until the following 4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Time needed for attainment of a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation

    Through the whole period of clearance treatment to attain a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation (whole period length is 2 weeks on average)

  • Recurrence of lower airways obstruction

    From the attainment of stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation until 3 months later

  • Incidence of infections of lower respiratory airways

    Through the whole period of clearance treatment to attain a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation (whole period length is 2 weeks on average) and through the following 3 months

  • Incidence of sepsis

    Through the whole period of clearance treatment to attain a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation (whole period length is 2 weeks on average) and through the following 3 months

  • Time needed for weaning from mechanical ventilation, from its start

    From mechanical ventilation start date until mechanical ventilation end date (up to 1 year)

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

T-PEP

EXPERIMENTAL

Each T-PEP session includes 10 inspiratory/expiratory cycles, repeated 3 times and interspersed by a pause of about 3 minutes. Each session will be immediately followed by bronchoaspiration and/or Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation (MI-E). Sessions will take place at least twice a day for a number of days until the attainment of an effective pulmonary ventilation (as detected by thoracic auscultation), then continued for a further 3 days (at least 2 times a day) for the outcome stabilization, as confirmed also by arterial-blood gas test (ABG), spirometry, chest X-ray and chest ultrasound. T-PEP sessions will take place at least 1 hour after meals or nutrition via nasogastric tube. Tracheal cannula will be kept constantly cuffed during the sessions. Ipratropium Bromide treatment will be on place from study entry until at least 4 weeks after the attainment of a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation.

Procedure: T-PEP

IPV

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each IPV session includes 3 treatment cycles, interspersed with a pause, consisting of a first high-frequency steps, lasting about 5 minutes, immediately followed by a second low-frequency step lasting approximately one minute. Each session will be immediately followed by bronchoaspiration and/or Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation (MI-E). Sessions will take place at least twice a day for a number of days until the attainment of an effective pulmonary ventilation (by thoracic auscultation), then continued for a further 3 days (at least 2 times a day) for outcome stabilization, as confirmed by ABG test, spirometry, chest X-ray and chest ultrasound. IPV sessions will take place at least 1 hour after meals or nutrition via nasogastric tube. Tracheal cannula will be kept constantly cuffed during the sessions. Ipratropium Bromide treatment will be on place from study entry until at least 4 weeks, after the attainment of a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation.

Procedure: IPV

Interventions

T-PEPPROCEDURE

First of all, a corrugated tube for ventilation is assembled: in one end with an antibacterial filter for ventilation and then an inflation system (like Auxiliary Manual Breathing Unit - AMBU); in the other end with a connector and then a one-way PEP Valve. The latter holds a junction for the tracheal cannula and a pressure gauge. A Venturi Resistor is placed in the expiratory part of the PEP Valve. After connection to the tracheal cannula, the disostructive maneuver is manually executed by a respiratory physiotherapist.

T-PEP
IPVPROCEDURE

IPV is delivered via a commercial device that can be set by frequency, duration of inspiratory time, inspiratory-expiratory ratio and positive end-expiratory pressure, based on patients characteristics and clinical needs. It is connected to the patient's tracheal cannula via a Mount catheter. The air supplied is sterile, due to the presence of an antibacterial filter present in the device.

IPV

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • spinal cord injury due to traumatic or non-traumatic etiology;
  • neurological level from C4 to C7 (included)
  • complete spinal cord injury, classifiable as "A" grade according to the Asia Impairment Scale (AIS);
  • distance from the spinal cord injury event from 1 to 5 weeks;
  • first admission to Montecatone R.I. (in particular to the Critical Care Unit);
  • patients with middle-basal hypoventilation;
  • patients in partial or continuous mechanical ventilation;
  • patients with tracheotomy;
  • patients capable of giving meaningful consent;
  • collaborating patients.

You may not qualify if:

  • thoracic trauma with non-drained thoracic fractures and / or pneumothorax and / or hemorrhage;
  • pleural effusion;
  • significant hemodynamic instability needing amines administration and / or Shock Index \> 1.5;
  • patients with tracheoesophageal fistulae;
  • patients with severe acquired brain injury;
  • patients with ongoing sepsis;
  • patients with ongoing pregnancy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute S.p.A.

Imola, BO, 40026, Italy

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Quadriplegia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ParalysisNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Carlotta Stopazzoni, MD

    Montecatone Rehanilitation Institute SpA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2019

First Posted

October 29, 2019

Study Start

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion

July 1, 2023

Study Completion

August 1, 2023

Last Updated

April 28, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Locations