Study Stopped
Patients case mix changed and did not match anymore with selection criteria
Randomized Controlled Study on T-PEP Versus IPV Method for Lower Respiratory Airways Clearance in Tetraplegic Tracheotomized Spinal Cord Injured Patients
T-PEP
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In tetraplegic patients with complete cervical spinal cord injury, respiratory complications are very frequent, especially in the sub-acute phase: the lungs often become obstructed due to the accumulation of secretions and the contemporary inefficiency of the cough mechanism. The present pilot study aims, in the context of a rehabilitative Critical Care Unit, at evaluating a not yet published method, called "T-PEP" and based on the principle of Positive Expiratory Pressure, applicable to tracheotomised and mechanically ventilated patients. This method, conceptually simple and low cost, is compared with a known method based on the principle of Percussive Intrapulmonary Ventilation (IPV). Safety and efficacy issues are covered.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Feb 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2023
CompletedApril 28, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.4 years
October 22, 2019
April 20, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of adverse events
Incidence of adverse events in the treatment period and during the subsequent follow-up, directly correlated with the lower airways cleaning treatments under investigation
Through the whole period of clearance treatment to attain a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation (whole period length is 2 weeks on average) until the following 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Time needed for attainment of a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation
Through the whole period of clearance treatment to attain a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation (whole period length is 2 weeks on average)
Recurrence of lower airways obstruction
From the attainment of stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation until 3 months later
Incidence of infections of lower respiratory airways
Through the whole period of clearance treatment to attain a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation (whole period length is 2 weeks on average) and through the following 3 months
Incidence of sepsis
Through the whole period of clearance treatment to attain a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation (whole period length is 2 weeks on average) and through the following 3 months
Time needed for weaning from mechanical ventilation, from its start
From mechanical ventilation start date until mechanical ventilation end date (up to 1 year)
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
T-PEP
EXPERIMENTALEach T-PEP session includes 10 inspiratory/expiratory cycles, repeated 3 times and interspersed by a pause of about 3 minutes. Each session will be immediately followed by bronchoaspiration and/or Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation (MI-E). Sessions will take place at least twice a day for a number of days until the attainment of an effective pulmonary ventilation (as detected by thoracic auscultation), then continued for a further 3 days (at least 2 times a day) for the outcome stabilization, as confirmed also by arterial-blood gas test (ABG), spirometry, chest X-ray and chest ultrasound. T-PEP sessions will take place at least 1 hour after meals or nutrition via nasogastric tube. Tracheal cannula will be kept constantly cuffed during the sessions. Ipratropium Bromide treatment will be on place from study entry until at least 4 weeks after the attainment of a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation.
IPV
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach IPV session includes 3 treatment cycles, interspersed with a pause, consisting of a first high-frequency steps, lasting about 5 minutes, immediately followed by a second low-frequency step lasting approximately one minute. Each session will be immediately followed by bronchoaspiration and/or Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation (MI-E). Sessions will take place at least twice a day for a number of days until the attainment of an effective pulmonary ventilation (by thoracic auscultation), then continued for a further 3 days (at least 2 times a day) for outcome stabilization, as confirmed by ABG test, spirometry, chest X-ray and chest ultrasound. IPV sessions will take place at least 1 hour after meals or nutrition via nasogastric tube. Tracheal cannula will be kept constantly cuffed during the sessions. Ipratropium Bromide treatment will be on place from study entry until at least 4 weeks, after the attainment of a stabilized effective pulmonary ventilation.
Interventions
First of all, a corrugated tube for ventilation is assembled: in one end with an antibacterial filter for ventilation and then an inflation system (like Auxiliary Manual Breathing Unit - AMBU); in the other end with a connector and then a one-way PEP Valve. The latter holds a junction for the tracheal cannula and a pressure gauge. A Venturi Resistor is placed in the expiratory part of the PEP Valve. After connection to the tracheal cannula, the disostructive maneuver is manually executed by a respiratory physiotherapist.
IPV is delivered via a commercial device that can be set by frequency, duration of inspiratory time, inspiratory-expiratory ratio and positive end-expiratory pressure, based on patients characteristics and clinical needs. It is connected to the patient's tracheal cannula via a Mount catheter. The air supplied is sterile, due to the presence of an antibacterial filter present in the device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- spinal cord injury due to traumatic or non-traumatic etiology;
- neurological level from C4 to C7 (included)
- complete spinal cord injury, classifiable as "A" grade according to the Asia Impairment Scale (AIS);
- distance from the spinal cord injury event from 1 to 5 weeks;
- first admission to Montecatone R.I. (in particular to the Critical Care Unit);
- patients with middle-basal hypoventilation;
- patients in partial or continuous mechanical ventilation;
- patients with tracheotomy;
- patients capable of giving meaningful consent;
- collaborating patients.
You may not qualify if:
- thoracic trauma with non-drained thoracic fractures and / or pneumothorax and / or hemorrhage;
- pleural effusion;
- significant hemodynamic instability needing amines administration and / or Shock Index \> 1.5;
- patients with tracheoesophageal fistulae;
- patients with severe acquired brain injury;
- patients with ongoing sepsis;
- patients with ongoing pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute S.p.A.
Imola, BO, 40026, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlotta Stopazzoni, MD
Montecatone Rehanilitation Institute SpA
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2019
First Posted
October 29, 2019
Study Start
February 1, 2022
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
August 1, 2023
Last Updated
April 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04