Compare Between APRV and Bipap Ventilation in ARDS Patients
Comparative Study Between Airway Pressure Release Ventilation and Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
To evaluate whether early use of airway pressure release ventilation would improve oxgyenation , improve lung compliance and shorten the time of mechanical ventilation compared to BIPAP ventilation in ARDS patients
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2025
CompletedJanuary 1, 2025
December 1, 2024
6 months
November 22, 2024
December 24, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
partial pressure of oxgyen in arterial blood
To evaluate whether early use of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) would improve oxygenation (as assessed by partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO2)).
an average of 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of days on mechanical ventilation
Up to 6 months
Study Arms (2)
APRV
OTHERThe settings for APRV were: * High airway pressure (Phigh) set at the last plateau airway pressure (Pplat), not to exceed 30 cmH2O and low airway pressure (Plow) set at (5 cmH2O). * The release phase (Tlow) setting adjusted to terminate the peak expiratory flow rate to ≥ 50%. * Release frequency of 10-14 cycles/min.
BiPAP
OTHERThe settings for BiPAP were: * Ti (inspiratory time) is set according to inspiratory time constant. * Optimum PEEP is set according to FiO2 to achieve the goal of SpO2≥90%. * FiO2 is set to achieve the goal of SpO2≥ 90%.
Interventions
Mechanical ventilation APRV mode ( Airway Pressure Release Ventilation )
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who meet all ARDS criteria (according to Berlin definition).
You may not qualify if:
- Age below 18 years and above 65 years.
- Presence of significant chronic pulmonary disorder (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, suppurative lung disease or diffuse alveolar hemorrhage) or documented barotrauma.
- Presence of cardiac disorder (rheumatic or ischemic heart disease).
- Presence of intracranial hypertension (suspected or confirmed).
- History of malignancies or patients on immunosuppressive drugs.
- Pregnancy or presence of neuromuscular disorder known to prolong intubation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (9)
Fredericks AS, Bunker MP, Gliga LA, Ebeling CG, Ringqvist JR, Heravi H, Manley J, Valladares J, Romito BT. Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: A Review of the Evidence, Theoretical Benefits, and Alternative Titration Strategies. Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med. 2020 Feb 5;14:1179548420903297. doi: 10.1177/1179548420903297. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32076372BACKGROUNDSaddy F, Moraes L, Santos CL, Oliveira GP, Cruz FF, Morales MM, Capelozzi VL, de Abreu MG, Garcia CS, Pelosi P, Rocco PR. Biphasic positive airway pressure minimizes biological impact on lung tissue in mild acute lung injury independent of etiology. Crit Care. 2013 Oct 8;17(5):R228. doi: 10.1186/cc13051.
PMID: 24103805BACKGROUNDGoligher EC, Hodgson CL, Adhikari NKJ, Meade MO, Wunsch H, Uleryk E, Gajic O, Amato MPB, Ferguson ND, Rubenfeld GD, Fan E. Lung Recruitment Maneuvers for Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S304-S311. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-340OT.
PMID: 29043837BACKGROUNDGallagher JJ. Alternative Modes of Mechanical Ventilation. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2018 Winter;29(4):396-404. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2018372.
PMID: 30523010BACKGROUNDMireles-Cabodevila E, Dugar S, Chatburn RL. APRV for ARDS: the complexities of a mode and how it affects even the best trials. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Apr;10(Suppl 9):S1058-S1063. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.156. No abstract available.
PMID: 29850185BACKGROUNDCheng J, Ma A, Dong M, Zhou Y, Wang B, Xue Y, Wang P, Yang J, Kang Y. Does airway pressure release ventilation offer new hope for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome? J Intensive Med. 2022 Mar 28;2(4):241-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.02.003. eCollection 2022 Oct.
PMID: 36785647BACKGROUNDZhong X, Wu Q, Yang H, Dong W, Wang B, Zhang Z, Liang G. Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Dec;8(24):1641. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6917.
PMID: 33490153BACKGROUNDKucuk MP, Ozturk CE, Ilkaya NK, Kucuk AO, Ergul DF, Ulger F. The effect of preemptive airway pressure release ventilation on patients with high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan-Feb;72(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.03.022. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
PMID: 33905798BACKGROUNDRose L, Hawkins M. Airway pressure release ventilation and biphasic positive airway pressure: a systematic review of definitional criteria. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Oct;34(10):1766-73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1216-3. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
PMID: 18633595BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rana A Mohamed, MSc
Ain Shams University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 22, 2024
First Posted
January 1, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
August 1, 2025
Last Updated
January 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
To ensure ultimate patients' privacy and disclosure , IPD might not be shared , but data will be available with the corresponding author on special request .