NCT05578742

Brief Summary

This study aim to compare the effect of Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on ventilation/perfusion mismatch in two phenotypes of patients with moderate-to-severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), characterized by their respiratory system elastance (Ers). Ventilation/perfusion mismatch will be assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT).

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
4mo left

Started Feb 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress88%
Feb 2024Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 27, 2022

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 13, 2022

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 8, 2024

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

December 8, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

September 27, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 2, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

pulmonary perfusionventilation-perfusion mismatchcompliancerecruitability

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in ventilation/perfusion mismatch between PEEP 5 and 15 cmH2O according to the two studied phenotypes

    Ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch will be assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). Mismatch is expressed in %. Comparison between phenotype with higher and lower elastance will be performed.

    immediately after each intervention

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Difference in respiratory mechanics between PEEP 5 and 15 cmH2O according to the two studied phenotypes

    immediately after each intervention

  • Difference in oxygenation between PEEP 5 and 15 cmH2O according to the two studied phenotypes

    immediately after each intervention

  • Difference in carbon clearance between PEEP 5 and 15 cmH2O according to the two studied phenotypes

    immediately after each intervention

  • Difference in dead space measured by capnometric volumetry between PEEP 5 and 15 cmH2O according to the two studied phenotypes

    immediately after each intervention

  • Difference in dead space measured by calorimetry between PEEP 5 and 15 cmH2O according to the two studied phenotypes

    immediately after each intervention

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Strategy A: PEEP 15 cmH2O → PEEP 5 cmH2O

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: PEEP decrease

Strategy B: PEEP 5 cmH2O → PEEP 15 cmH2O

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: PEEP increase

Interventions

PEEP increasePROCEDURE

Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) will be increased from 5 to 15 cmH2O.

Strategy B: PEEP 5 cmH2O → PEEP 15 cmH2O
PEEP decreasePROCEDURE

Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) will be decreased from 15 to 5 cmH2O.

Strategy A: PEEP 15 cmH2O → PEEP 5 cmH2O

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • intubated patients with moderate and severe ARDS (Berlin definition, PaO2/FiO2 ≤200 mmHg at PEEP 5 cmH2O)
  • undergoing deep sedation
  • on controlled mechanical ventilation
  • between 24 hours and 5 days after intubation.

You may not qualify if:

  • age \<18 years old; pregnancy
  • patient undergoing legal protection
  • contra-indications to EIT (e. g. severe chest trauma or wounds)
  • pneumothorax; patient undergoing ECMO
  • patient with BMI ≥35 kg/m2
  • hemodynamic instability with MAP \<60 mmHg despite vasopressors.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Angers Hospital

Angers, Maine et Loire, 49933, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Compliance

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Patient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Fifty patients will be enrolled, divided into 2 groups (n=26 each) according to a dynamic balanced sampling based on normalized respiratory system elastance (ERS) measured at PEEP 5 cmH2O with Vt 6-7 ml/kg PBW (\<2 cmH2O.mL-1.kg-1 vs. ≥2 cmH2O.mL-1.kg-1). Enrolment into each study group will be closed at 26 patients. Then, patients will be randomized and allocated to one of the following strategies: * Strategy A: PEEP 15 cmH2O → PEEP 5 cmH2O * Strategy B: PEEP 5 cmH2O → PEEP 15 cmH2O A parallel study will be conducted in Italy, to reach 50 more patients. Data will be shared between these two studies.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2022

First Posted

October 13, 2022

Study Start

February 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

December 8, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations