NCT06747988

Brief Summary

The goal of this prospective study at Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center is to investigate the the efficacy and safety of using the novel TTS helix tack suture device as a dynamic traction device during colon and gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The investigators of this study hypothesize that a dynamic traction during ESD can be less traumatic than with other traction devices.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
3mo left

Started Mar 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress85%
Mar 2025Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 19, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 24, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 30, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 20, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

December 24, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

December 19, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 19, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Technical success

    Being able to dissect the lesion to facilitate en bloc removal (removal of the entire tumor endoscopically in one piece)

    Day 1 (procedure day)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Dissection speed

    Day 1 (procedure day)

  • R0 and curative resection rates

    Day 1 (procedure day)

  • Total procedure time

    Day 1 (procedure day)

  • NASA Task Load Index

    Day 1 (procedure day)

  • Intraprocedural adverse events

    Day 1 (procedure day), up to 48 hours after procedure.

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Interventions

After circumferential incision and trimming the submucosa at the incision's edge, dissection is initiated until approximately 20 to 30% of the anal side (for colonic lesions) or oral side (for gastric lesions) of lesion has been dissected leaving a flap of at least 1 cm in length. Once the mucosal flap is created the X-tack device is introduced through the endoscope channel. The first tack is placed on the opposite wall of the lesion, the 2nd and 3rd tack will then be placed next to each other on the mucosal flap portion of the lesion. The 4th tack does not have to be placed but can be used to generate further traction at any time. Clips can be placed along the suture and clipped to the wall at any point to change angulation of traction. The sutures can then be cut and released from the tissue

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients undergoing ESD procedure at Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center - Houston, TX.

You may qualify if:

  • The patient is ≥ 18 years old.
  • Patients can provide informed consent.
  • The patient is referred for ESD procedure of colonic or gastric neoplastic lesions and with one of the following criteria:
  • A- Lesions with prior failed resection of any size. B- Granular lateral spreading tumors (GLST) more than 30 mm. C- Non granular lateral spreading tumors (NGLST) more than 20 mm. D- Any lesion with suspected superficial submucosal invasion. E- Subepithelial lesions.

You may not qualify if:

  • The patient is \< 18 years old.
  • The patient refuses and/or is unable to provide consent.
  • The patient is a pregnant woman.
  • Lesions with morphology: pedunculated type (Paris Ip, Ips).
  • Appendiceal orifice or IC valve lesions
  • Patients with lesions removed with other techniques besides ESD (submucosal tunneling technique \[STER\] or EMR).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Tanaka S, Terasaki M, Kanao H, Oka S, Chayama K. Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc. 2012 May;24 Suppl 1:73-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01252.x.

  • Othman MO, Jawaid SA, Rungta M, Sur N, Dhingra S. Double-balloon endolumenal intervention platform with flexible grasper to expedite colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection. VideoGIE. 2020 Dec 26;6(3):144-146. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2020.11.014. eCollection 2021 Mar. No abstract available.

  • Nagata M. Usefulness of underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection in saline solution with a monopolar knife for colorectal tumors (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1345-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.032. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

  • Hernandez A, Marya NB, Sawas T, Rajan E, Gades NM, Wong Kee Song LM, Abu Dayyeh BK, Buttar N, Storm AC. Gastrointestinal defect closure using a novel through-the-scope helix tack and suture device compared to endoscopic clips in a survival porcine model (with video). Endosc Int Open. 2021 Apr;9(4):E572-E577. doi: 10.1055/a-1370-9256. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

  • Ge PS, Thompson CC, Jirapinyo P, Aihara H. Suture pulley countertraction method reduces procedure time and technical demand of endoscopic submucosal dissection among novice endoscopists learning endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective randomized ex vivo study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jan;89(1):177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 25.

  • Rieder E, Makris KI, Martinec DV, Swanstrom LL. The suture-pulley method for endolumenal triangulation in endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy. 2011;43 Suppl 2 UCTN:E319-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256774. Epub 2011 Oct 21. No abstract available.

  • Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, Williams SJ, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut. 2017 Oct;66(10):1779-1789. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309848. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Month
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2024

First Posted

December 24, 2024

Study Start

March 30, 2025

Primary Completion

March 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 20, 2026

Last Updated

December 24, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no expected significant increased risk associated with the use of the traction device in ESD beyond what the current standard is for the procedure. Loss of confidentiality is the only other risk associated with this project. All measures to ensure patient confidentiality will be employed. Data will be coded and entered into a password-protected computer. Only the Principal Investigator and Study Research Coordinators will have access to data with patient identifiers. There will be no disclosure of a patients protected health information. Paper copies of the study documents will be created only as needed and only shown to the investigators listed in the study. Once the study is completed, all paper copies will be destroyed. If the results of the study are published or used in any presentations, all patient related information will be coded.

Locations