Traction vs. No Traction in Colonic ESD
Comparison of the Efficacy of Using a Traction Device in Colonic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Conventional ESD: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted at Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center is to compare the effectiveness and clinical outcomes of using a traction device in colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to those of using conventional ESD. The investigators of this study hypothesize that use of the traction device will help expedite colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 7, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2027
March 24, 2026
February 1, 2026
3.1 years
November 27, 2023
March 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Dissection speed
Length of time to perform endoscopic submucosal dissection by the operator as measured by calculating area of lesion divided by time (cm\^2/hours).
Day 1 (procedure day)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
En-bloc, R0, and curative resection rates
Day 1 (procedure day)
Total procedure time
Day 1 (procedure day)
Intraprocedural adverse events
Day 1 (procedure day), up to 48 hours after procedure.
Post-procedural adverse events
1 month post-procedure
Abdominal pain
1 hour post-procedure, 24 hours post-procedure.
Study Arms (2)
ESD with traction device
EXPERIMENTALESD of target lesion will be performed with the assistance of a traction device.
Control arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORESD of target lesion will be performed without the use of a traction device
Interventions
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) will be the technique used to remove target lesions.
Use of traction device to aid in removing target lesions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is ≥ 18 years old.
- Patients can provide informed consent.
- Patient is referred for ESD procedure of colonic neoplastic lesions and with one of the following criteria:
- A- Lesions with prior resection or with scar at any size. B- Granular lateral spreading tumors (GLST) more than 3 cm. C- Non granular lateral spreading tumors (NGLST) more than 20 mm. D- Any suspected submucosal invasion such as Paris classification II a +II or lesions with positive non lifting sign.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is \< 18 years old.
- Patient refused and/or unable to provide consent.
- Patient is a pregnant woman.
- Lesions with morphology: pedunculated type (Paris IP, Ips).
- Appendiceal orifice or IC valve lesions. 6. Patients with lesions removed with other techniques besides ESD (like hybrid ESD or submucosal tunneling technique STER and EMR).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Baylor College of Medicinelead
- Micro-Tech Endoscopy USAcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Baylor St. Lukes Medical Center (BSLMC)
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (6)
Tanaka S, Terasaki M, Kanao H, Oka S, Chayama K. Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc. 2012 May;24 Suppl 1:73-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01252.x.
PMID: 22533757BACKGROUNDOthman MO, Jawaid SA, Rungta M, Sur N, Dhingra S. Double-balloon endolumenal intervention platform with flexible grasper to expedite colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection. VideoGIE. 2020 Dec 26;6(3):144-146. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2020.11.014. eCollection 2021 Mar. No abstract available.
PMID: 33738368BACKGROUNDTamaru Y, Kuwai T, Miyakawa A, Kanazawa N, Kusunoki R, Shimura H, Uchiyama S, Ishaq S, Kohno H. Efficacy of a Traction Device for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using a Scissor-Type Knife: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 1;117(11):1797-1804. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002019. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
PMID: 36191269BACKGROUNDNagata M. Usefulness of underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection in saline solution with a monopolar knife for colorectal tumors (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1345-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.032. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
PMID: 29242059BACKGROUNDYamasaki Y, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Kato M, Hamada K, Aoi K, Tonai Y, Matsuura N, Kanesaka T, Yamashina T, Akasaka T, Hanaoka N, Higashino K, Ishihara R, Iishi H. Traction-assisted colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection using clip and line: a feasibility study. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Jan;4(1):E51-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107779. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
PMID: 26793785BACKGROUNDBurgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, Williams SJ, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut. 2017 Oct;66(10):1779-1789. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309848. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
PMID: 27464708BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed Othman, MD
Baylor College of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2023
First Posted
December 7, 2023
Study Start
December 5, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 20, 2027
Last Updated
March 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no expected significant increased risk associated with the use of the traction device in ESD beyond what the current standard is for the procedure. Loss of confidentiality is the only other risk associated with this project. All measures to ensure patient confidentiality will be employed. Data will be coded and entered into a password-protected computer. Only the Principal Investigator and Study Research Coordinators will have access to data with patient identifiers. There will be no disclosure of a patients protected health information. Paper copies of the study documents will be created only as needed and only shown to the investigators listed in the study. Once the study is completed, all paper copies will be destroyed. If the results of the study are published or used in any presentations, all patient related information will be coded.