The Effect of Uroshield on Sputum-specimen Bacterial Growth
1 other identifier
interventional
48
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The investigators retrospectively register the conduct of this study after its completion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2024
CompletedDecember 11, 2024
December 1, 2024
8 months
December 1, 2024
December 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Sputum-specimen bacterial growth
Sputum specimen collection at day 0 and then every third day for 15 days.
six months
Growth of multidrug resistant organisms from sputum cultures
Isolation of sputum specimens collected at day 0 and then every third day for 15 days.
six months
Study Arms (2)
Active device study arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy Procedure: In this study, half of the recruited patients were connected to the UROSHIELD device (study group), while the other half was connected to a similar but inactive sham device (control group). The medical treating team, research team, and the patients themselves were unaware of who received the active device and who was connected to the inactive, sham device. As mentioned, randomization and allocation of devices was performed by a physician not otherwise involved in the conduct of the study or with data processing.
Sham device control arm
PLACEBO COMPARATORStudy Procedure: In this study, half of the recruited patients were connected to the UROSHIELD device (study group), while the other half was connected to a similar but inactive sham device (control group). The medical treating team, research team, and the patients themselves were unaware of who received the active device and who was connected to the inactive, sham device. As mentioned, randomization and allocation of devices was performed by a physician not otherwise involved in the conduct of the study or with data processing.
Interventions
UROSHIELDTM is a small device that generates low-energy surface acoustic waves, which transmit energy to the endotracheal tube through a thin cable attached to the tube. Laboratory studies using catheterized urinary tract models have shown a significant reduction in microbial colonization and reduced development of antimicrobial resistance in UROSHIELDTM device treated individuals.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mechanically ventilated patients
You may not qualify if:
- Less than 18 years of age, pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Reuven Friedmann, MD
Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2024
First Posted
December 11, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 31, 2016
Study Completion
August 31, 2017
Last Updated
December 11, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share