Opioid vs. Benzodiazepine-based Sedation for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Internal Medicine Ward
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Opioid-based sedation as a first line in mechanically ventilated patients has been considered the "gold standard" in intensive care unit patients around the world for several decades. Advantages of opiate-based sedation, compared to benzodiazepine-based sedation, which has been used in the past, include a reduction in delirium scores, better pain control, decreasing the time between cessation of sedation and patient awakening, and decreasing the time between cessation of sedation and extubation, with decreased ICU admission times. In most Western European countries, as well as in the United States, there are almost no mechanically ventilated patients hospitalized outside the intensive care unit. In a few countries, including Japan and Israel, mechanically ventilated patients are also hospitalized outside of intensive care units, as part of internal or surgical wards. Contrary to the vast knowledge accumulated regarding different sedation methods in ventilated patients in intensive care units, there are almost no studies that have evaluated different sedation methods in ventilated patients hospitalized in non-intensive care wards. Thus, while there is consensus on the benefits of opioid-based sedation in intensive care units, there is insufficient information to recommend the preferred sedation method in non-ICU wards. For various reasons, in a large number of the internal medicine wards of hospitals in Israel, the common sedation practice for ventilated patients is still benzodiazepine-based sedation. In the past year, a pilot program was initiated in Internal Medicine Department A at Meir Hospital in Kfar Saba, in which a new protocol for opioid-based sedation in ventilated patients was implemented. The protocol is based on the continuous intravenous infusion of fentanyl as the first line of treatment for sedation in ventilated patients only. If the sedation-agitation level (as measured by the RASS score) did not match the target RASS score set by the attending physician, a dose up to a maximum limit could be increased according to the protocol. Second-line sedation drugs were addition of continuous intravenous infusion of midazolam (in addition to fentanyl) in hemodynamically stable patients, or addition of continuous intravenous infusion of ketamine in unstable patients. In stable patients who did not reach the desired RASS level under continuous infusion of fentanyl and midazolam, ketamine could be added as a third line drug, in addition to fentanyl and midazolam.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2024
CompletedMay 8, 2025
May 1, 2025
3 years
July 25, 2021
May 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
RASS score
comparison of delirium score between the groups
1 year
Study Arms (2)
fentanyl-based sedation group
EXPERIMENTALmidazolam-based sedation group
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
fentanyl-based sedation instead of midazolam-based sedation in ventilated patients
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Meir medical center Kfar Saba
Kfar Saba, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sara Dichtwald, Dr
Meir Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2021
First Posted
July 30, 2021
Study Start
August 1, 2021
Primary Completion
August 1, 2024
Study Completion
August 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share