Erector Spinae Plane Block v.s Patient Controlled Analgesia in Correction Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis
Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block v.s Patient Controlled Analgesia in Correction Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Scoliosis correction surgery involves extensive surgical wounds, intense intraoperative stimulation, and severe postoperative pain, often necessitating the use of potent opioids. However, there is a critical clinical need for effective pain management strategies that both ensure sufficient analgesia and minimize opioid-related adverse effects. The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) has shown promise as an effective analgesic technique, but its application in scoliosis correction surgery has not been reported.We hypothesize that ESPB provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA) pumps. Specifically, ESPB is expected to significantly reduce postoperative pain scores, decrease perioperative opioid consumption, and mitigate opioid-related side effects. This study is a randomized controlled trial involving 40 participants undergoing scoliosis correction surgery, randomized into two groups: the ESPB group and the PCA group. The primary outcome measure is the resting pain score at 2 hours postoperatively, which will be used to evaluate the efficacy of ESPB. Secondary outcomes include perioperative opioid consumption and the incidence of opioid-related adverse effects. The study aims to provide evidence for ESPB as an innovative and effective method for postoperative analgesia in scoliosis correction surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2027
December 11, 2024
December 1, 2024
2 years
December 1, 2024
December 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Resting numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a tool for assessing pain intensity, allowing patients to rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain," 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable," and pain levels are categorized as 0 (no pain), 1-3 (mild pain), 4-6 (moderate pain), and 7-10 (severe pain).
2 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Severe complications
30 days postoperatively
Postoperative resting NRS pain scores
3 days after surgery
Postoperative NRS pain scores during movement
3 days after surgery
Postoperative opioids consumption
30 days postoperatively
Time to initiate functional exercises
30 days postoperatively
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ESPB Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive ultrasound-guided ESPB preoperatively, using 40 ml of 0.3% ropivacaine.
PCA Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive postoperative PCA with a formulation of 200 µg sufentanil diluted to 100 ml. The PCA settings will include a background dose of 3 ml/hour, a lockout time of 15 minutes, and a bolus dose of 2 ml.
Interventions
Participants will receive ultrasound-guided ESPB preoperatively, using 40 ml of 0.3% ropivacaine.
Participants will receive postoperative PCA with a formulation of 200 µg sufentanil diluted to 100 ml. The PCA settings will include a background dose of 3 ml/hour, a lockout time of 15 minutes, and a bolus dose of 2 ml.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 14 years or older, regardless of gender.
- Scheduled for scoliosis correction surgery.
- Signed informed consent from the participant or their legal guardian.
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to local anesthetics such as ropivacaine.
- Family history of malignant hyperthermia.
- Severe systemic diseases affecting the heart, lungs, liver, or kidneys.
- Neurological or psychiatric disorders.
- Communication difficulties, such as hearing impairment or speech disorders.
- Concurrent participation in other clinical studies.
- Other conditions deemed unsuitable for participation by the investigators.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
Related Publications (1)
Liao C, Zhong J, Lai X, Liao R. Analgesic effects of bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus patient controlled intravenous analgesia in correction surgery for idiopathic scoliosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Nov 14;14(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00622-9.
PMID: 41239513DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ren Liao, M.D.
West China Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to differences in clinical management between the groups, investigators, participants, and clinical staff will be aware of group assignments. However, follow-up researchers and statisticians responsible for data analysis will remain blinded to the group assignments.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2024
First Posted
December 11, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2027
Last Updated
December 11, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the main study results and ending 3 years following publication.
- Access Criteria
- Requests for data sharing should be directed to the corresponding author: liaoren7733@163.com.
Individual participant data (IPD) will be shared after de-identification.The shared data will include de-identified individual participant data, and metadata supporting the primary and secondary outcomes, as well as the study protocol.Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the main study results and ending 3 years following publication. Requests for data sharing should be directed to the corresponding author (liaoren7733@163.com). Upon approval of a formal proposal, a data-sharing agreement will be signed, and access will be granted through a secure datasharing platform.