NCT06709560

Brief Summary

Males and females show distinct differences in cardiovascular function, especially during exercise. Evidence suggests that females generally have lower blood pressure due to hormonal influences that reduce blood vessel constriction. This protective effect may contribute to a lower risk of high blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases in females compared to males. Additionally, females tend to have different patterns of heart rate control and blood pressure regulation, largely due to differences in the autonomic nervous system and hormonal balance. One key mechanism involved in blood pressure control is the baroreflex, which helps stabilize blood pressure by adjusting heart rate and blood vessel function. The sensitivity of the baroreflex (known as baroreflex sensitivity, or BRS) can vary between males and females. For instance, females may exhibit slower adjustments in heart rate in response to blood pressure changes, but they also tend to have better blood pressure regulation during moderate exercise. The main purpose of this study is to explore whether these sex-specific differences extend to more intense exercise. Investigators will compare the responses of young, active males and females to cycling at two exercise intensities: moderate (50% of Heart Rate Reserve, HRR) and vigorous (80% HRR). As a secondary purpose, investigators we will assess the inter-day repeatability of HRV and BRS parameters measured at rest and during moderate and vigorous intensity exercise utilizing sequence and spectral indices in apparently healthy young adult males and females. We hypothesize that:

  1. 1.Females will show higher HRV and BRS at rest compared to males, indicating better heart rate control.
  2. 2.During exercise, females will have greater cardiovagal (heart-related) activation than males, regardless of exercise intensity.
  3. 3.When exercise sessions are matched for blood pressure, there will be no significant sex differences in HRV and BRS responses.
  4. 4.Sequential methods techniques can be used to assess cardiovagal BRS and HRV changes between days during exercise in young adults, regardless of their sex. In addition, the inclusion of vigorous intensity may improve the repeatability of the outcome measure due to sympathetic outflow predominance.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 2, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 28, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 28, 2023

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 23, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 29, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 29, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

November 23, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 26, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Hear Rate VariabilityBaroreflex SensitivityExercise IntensityAcute ExerciseSex Differences

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in Heart Rate Variability

    R-R intervals were derived from beat-to-beat blood pressure pulse intervals using finger plethysmography (Finapres® Nova, Amsterdam, Netherlands) at rest and during exercise across all visits. The pressure signal's upstroke was identified with a 2 ms resolution, and the interval between consecutive upstrokes was measured. In the frequency domain, low-frequency (LF; 0.04-0.15 Hz) reflected sympathetic and parasympathetic modulation, while high-frequency (HF; 0.15-0.40 Hz) served as a marker of parasympathetic modulation. The LF/HF ratio indicated sympathovagal dominance. Data acquisition and analysis were conducted following the Task Force guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

    At rest and in the last 2 minutes of the 6 minutes bout of MICE and VICE

  • Changes in Baroreflex sensitivity

    A spectral method was used to compute baroreflex sensitivity as the transfer gain of the cross-spectra between pressure and interval at rest and during exercise across all visits. Coherence was typically high in the 10 s rhythm band (0.06-0.15 Hz) and at ventilatory frequencies (0.15-0.5 Hz). Spectral estimates of the recordings were computed using the Finapres® Nova device software (Amsterdam, Netherlands), which provided an easy-to-use interface. A discrete Fourier transform, requiring no interpolation or zero padding, was applied. Triangular spectral smoothing was set at a width of 10, reflecting the 10-minute duration of the recordings. Spectral density, coherence, pressure-interval transfer gain, and phase plots were displayed on the device screen, with a cursor allowing manual selection of bands with high coherence and spectral power. An output program listed the resultant data and all selections made for subsequent analysis.

    At rest and in the last 2 minutes of the 6 minutes bout of moderate intensity continuous exercise and high intensity continuous exercise

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Regional Arterial Stiffness

    At rest in each visit to the laboratory, just before the 6 minutes bouts of MICE and VICE

  • Central Blood Pressure

    At rest and in the last 2 minutes of the 6 minutes bout of moderate intensity continuous exercise and high intensity continuous exercise

  • Changes in Local Arterial Stiffness

    At rest and in the last 2 minutes of the 6 minutes bout of moderate intensity continuous exercise and high intensity continuous exercise

  • Changes in Carotid Blood Pressure Wave Intensity

    At rest and in the last 2 minutes of the 6 minutes bout of moderate intensity continuous exercise and high intensity continuous exercise

Study Arms (2)

Heart Rate Reserve (HRR)-Based Exercise Intensity Prescription

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The exercise intensity is based solely on HRR.

Other: Moderate Intensity Continuous ExerciseOther: Vigorous Intensity Continuous Exercise

Blood Pressure-Matched Exercise Intensity Prescription

EXPERIMENTAL

Instead of relying on HRR, exercise intensity is tailored to replicate the average systolic blood pressure achieved in the initial HRR-based session.

Other: Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise Matched for Blood PressureOther: Vigorous Intensity Continuous Exercise Matched for Blood Pressure

Interventions

Participants perform a continuous cycling exercise session on a reclined ergometer at moderate intensity (50% HRR)

Heart Rate Reserve (HRR)-Based Exercise Intensity Prescription

Participants perform a continuous cycling exercise session on a reclined ergometer, at a vigorous intensity (80% HRR).

Heart Rate Reserve (HRR)-Based Exercise Intensity Prescription

Participants perform a cycling session where exercise intensity is adjusted to match the systolic blood pressure levels attained during the first visit at moderate intensity (50% HRR).

Blood Pressure-Matched Exercise Intensity Prescription

Participants perform a different cycling session where exercise intensity is adjusted to match the systolic blood pressure levels attained during the first visit at vigorous intensity (80% HRR).

Blood Pressure-Matched Exercise Intensity Prescription

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 44 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Males and females aged 18 to 44 years old.
  • Physical active as assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
  • Low risk to increase physical Activity as assessed by the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q+).

You may not qualify if:

  • Smoking
  • Diagnosed with cardiac, metabolic or renal diseases
  • Taking cardioactive medication
  • Resting hypertension (systolic blood pressure \>140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure \> 90 mmHg).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ginásio Clube Português

Lisbon, Portugal

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Bassareo PP, Crisafulli A. Gender Differences in Hemodynamic Regulation and Cardiovascular Adaptations to Dynamic Exercise. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2020;16(1):65-72. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666190321141856.

    PMID: 30907327BACKGROUND
  • Seo MW, Park TY, Jung H. Sex Differences in Heart Rate Variability and Vascular Function Following High-Intensity Interval Training in Young Adults. J Hum Kinet. 2023 Oct 11;90:89-100. doi: 10.5114/jhk/170964. eCollection 2024 Jan.

    PMID: 38380301BACKGROUND
  • Schumann A, Gupta Y, Gerstorf D, Demuth I, Bar KJ. Sex differences in the age-related decrease of spontaneous baroreflex function in healthy individuals. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2024 Jan 1;326(1):H158-H165. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00648.2023. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

    PMID: 37947436BACKGROUND
  • Wheatley CM, Snyder EM, Johnson BD, Olson TP. Sex differences in cardiovascular function during submaximal exercise in humans. Springerplus. 2014 Aug 20;3:445. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-445. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25191635BACKGROUND
  • Fu Q, Ogoh S. Sex differences in baroreflex function in health and disease. J Physiol Sci. 2019 Nov;69(6):851-859. doi: 10.1007/s12576-019-00727-z. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

    PMID: 31721084BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coitus

Interventions

Blood Pressure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sexual BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vital SignsPhysical ExaminationDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisHemodynamicsCardiovascular Physiological PhenomenaCirculatory and Respiratory Physiological Phenomena

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants were blinded to the order of the visits until arrival at the laboratory.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2024

First Posted

November 29, 2024

Study Start

January 2, 2023

Primary Completion

July 28, 2023

Study Completion

July 28, 2023

Last Updated

November 29, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data obtained in this study may be provided to qualified researchers with academic interest in the effects of acute exercise on the autonomic function. Data or samples shared will be coded, with no PHI included. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements (i.e. a material transfer agreement) are prerequisites to the sharing of data with the requesting party.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Data requests can be submitted starting 9 months after article publication and the data will be made accessible for up to 24 months. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Access Criteria
Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information or to submit a request, please contact xmelo@egasmoniz.edu.pt

Locations