Effect of Resistance Exercise on Physical and Psychological Factors
Effects of Resistance Exercise-based Physical Activity Programme on Physical and Psychological Factors in Inactive Adults
2 other identifiers
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Physical inactivity is a key risk factor for cardiovascular and metabolic disorders, negatively affecting emotional well-being by increasing psychological distress and reducing mental health. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a resistance-based physical activity program on physical and psychological outcomes in physically inactive adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy
Started Mar 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 30, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2024
CompletedDecember 2, 2024
November 1, 2024
8 months
November 25, 2024
November 27, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Depression
The Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) is a widely used self-report tool designed to measure depression, anxiety, and stress levels in participants. It consists of 21 items divided into three subscales: * Depression (e.g., feelings of sadness, lack of motivation) * Anxiety (e.g., nervousness, fearfulness) * Stress (e.g., tension, irritability) Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale, with the following options: 1. 0 = Did not apply to me at all 2. 1 = Applied to me to some degree, or some of the time 3. 2 = Applied to me to a considerable degree, or a good part of the time 4. 3 = Applied to me very much, or most of the time For each subscale, the scores range from 0 to 42 after adjustment.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Functional Movement Screen Test Protocol
a standardized assessment tool designed to evaluate fundamental movement patterns, identify asymmetries and weaknesses, and predict injury risk. The FMS consists of 7 movements: deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotational stability.Each movement is scored on a 0-3 scale, with 3 indicating optimal performance. The maximum total score is 21.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Balance
Balance was assessed using the Sensbalance MiniBoard (Sensamove®, Utrecht, The Netherlands), a movable platform that provides an interactive challenge to balance control. Participants performed two tasks, each completed twice and held for 30 seconds
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Strength tests
Lafayette Manual Muscle Test System (Model 01165) was used to determine isometric muscle strength. The Lafayette Manual Muscle Tester (MMT) system is an ergonomic handheld device used to objectively measure muscle strength.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Exercise group
EXPERIMENTALThe 12-week resistance training program consisted of three supervised sessions per week, each lasting approximately 55-60 minutes. Sessions were structured as follows: 5-7 minute dynamic warm-up, 35-40 minutes of resistance training, and 4-5 minutes of stretching for active recovery. Participants were paired based on similar strength fitness levels and progressed according to the principle of periodized progressive overload.
control group
NO INTERVENTIONdid not participate in any structured exercise program during the 12-week study period. The participants were asked to maintain their usual lifestyle habits.
Interventions
The 12-week resistance training program consisted of three supervised sessions per week, each lasting approximately 55-60 minutes. Sessions were structured as follows: 5-7 minute dynamic warm-up, 35-40 minutes of resistance training, and 4-5 minutes of stretching for active recovery.Participants were paired based on similar strength fitness levels and progressed according to the principle of periodized progressive overload. Training was delivered using a circuit protocol with 2-3 sets per exercise. The initial 4-week phase included 2 sets per exercise, with 8-20 repetitions and 1-2 minutes rest between sets. .The program incorporated functional exercises targeting the lower extremities, core, and upper extremities, utilizing equipment such as resistance bands, medicine balls, jump ropes, dumbbells, bars, and stability balls. Participants performed exercises in a circuit sequence, with the intensity, number of sets, and repetitions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged between 40-60 years
- Physically independent
- Not having cardiac, orthopedic, or musculoskeletal dysfunctions
- Not participating in regular physical activity more than once a week for the last 5 months before the beginning of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic ankle instability
- Lower extremity musculoskeletal injury in the previous 6 months
- Undergoing hormonal replacement therapy
- Having uncontrolled diabetes
- Having uncontrolled hypertension
- Histroy of cardiovascular disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Monira Aldhahilead
- Namik Kemal Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey,
Tekirdağ, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kübra Ustaömer
Namik Kemal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants and outcome assessors, the data analysts were masked to group assignment throughout the study. The data analysts were not present during the exercise sessions or assessments and did not have access to information that could potentially reveal whether data belonged to the exercise or control group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2024
First Posted
November 27, 2024
Study Start
March 30, 2024
Primary Completion
November 20, 2024
Study Completion
November 24, 2024
Last Updated
December 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The study investigators plan to disseminate the results of this trial through publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentation at relevant conferences. While the investigators are committed to transparency and data sharing, individual participant data (IPD) may not be shared due to the potential risk of identifying participants despite anonymization efforts. Given the specific nature of the interventions and assessments, there is a possibility that participant identities could be inadvertently disclosed.