NCT06705114

Brief Summary

This study aimed to examine the impact of mandibular implant overdentures on tongue movement during mastication.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 20, 2023

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 20, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 20, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 22, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 26, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 26, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

November 22, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 25, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Masticationimplantmandibularultrasoundtongue movement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • ultrasound investigation of tongue movement

    The evaluation of tongue movement was conducted using an ultrasound imaging system (Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with a 3.1-MHz convex probe. A layer of ultrasound jelly (Sono Jelly, Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation) was applied to the patient's skin under the probe. The patient was instructed to sit in upright position, and the probe was placed under the chin area to allow the beam to pass through the distal surfaces of the second premolars on both the right and left sides. The probe was secured in place using a microphone stand (Panasonic System Networks Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with adjustable height and angle. The position of the tongue was confirmed on the B-mode image of the sagittal plane, which provided a two-dimensional recording of the slice through the oral cavity. The recording rate was 0.0476 seconds (21 frames per second). Ultrasound images were taken while the patient chewed 1/4 of a cookie in a normal manner until it was swallowed.

    after 3 months of denture and overdenture insertion

Study Arms (2)

group I: complete dentures

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each patient received a newly constructed conventional complete denture.

Procedure: complete denture

group II: mandibular implant overdenture

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Two dental implants were inserted in the patient's mandibular arch at the canine region using guided surgery and a delayed loading protocol.

Procedure: implant overdenture

Interventions

Each patient received a newly constructed conventional complete denture with optimal denture extension and lingualized balanced occlusal concept

group I: complete dentures

Two dental implants were inserted in the patient's mandibular arch at the canine region using guided surgery and a delayed loading protocol.After 3-4 months, the dental implants were exposed and ball abutments were screwed into the implants. The housing of the ball attachments were incorporated into the fitting surface of the mandibular denture using a direct pick-up technique (Fig. 1B). The mandibular overdenture was then inserted into the patient's mouth and occlusal adjustment was done using articulating paper to remove any occlusal interferences. Follow-up visits were scheduled.

group II: mandibular implant overdenture

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients were completely edentulous for at least one year, had a normal maxillo-mandibular relationship, and had available inter-arch space. They were nonsmokers and free from any systemic diseases that could affect implant osseointegration

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with head and neck surgery, skeletal deformity, and temporomandibular joint disorder were excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

faculty of dentistry, mansoura university Mansoura, Egypt,

Al Mansurah, 35516, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Goncalves GSY, de Magalhaes KMF, Rocha EP, Dos Santos PH, Assuncao WG. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported full dentures all-on-four concept: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):83-94. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04213-y. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prosthesis Failure

Interventions

Denture, Complete

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DenturesDental ProsthesisProsthodonticsDentistryProstheses and ImplantsEquipment and Supplies

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2024

First Posted

November 26, 2024

Study Start

October 20, 2023

Primary Completion

July 20, 2024

Study Completion

September 20, 2024

Last Updated

November 26, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations