Accuracy of 3-dimensional Printed Implant Cast Versus Conventional Stone Cast for Edentulous Mandibular Arch
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will be conducted to compare between accuracy of 3D printed implant cast produced from digital impression and conventional stone cast produced from conventional splinted open tray impression for edentulous mandibular arch with four implants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 17, 2024
CompletedDecember 20, 2023
September 1, 2023
1 year
September 17, 2023
December 13, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
accuracy of 3D printed casts
Accuracy of 3D printed casts will be evaluated digitally by geomagic software
6 month
Study Arms (2)
Group I conventional stone cast
ACTIVE COMPARATORMandibular stone cast with 4 parallel implants analogues in canines and second premolar regions will be fabricated conventionally.
Group II 3D printed implant cast
ACTIVE COMPARATOR3D printed implant mandibular cast with 4 parallel digital implants analogues in canines and second premolar regions will be fabricated digitally.
Interventions
four implant casts fabricated
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients were healthy and free from all systemic diseases that affect osseointegration or bone resorption around the implant as recorded from medical and dental history.
- Patients were free from all oral pathological conditions and any remaining roots which were verified by pre-operative panoramic radiograph.
- Patients with U shaped arch, flat mandibular alveolar ridge covered with even compressibility healthy mucosa and gingival thickness of about 2mm verified by dual scan of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) during treatment planning. Fig.(1)
- Adequate residual alveolar bone quality D2 bone type in the anterior and premolar regions according to the Misch bone density classification scheme (850 to1250 housefield units) confirmed by CBCT.
- Angel's class I maxillomandibular relation with moderate inter- arch space (20 mm) confirmed through tentative jaw relationship, and restorative space of at least 15 mm determined by putty index technique
- Patients complain from poor retentive mandibular denture seeking for alternative fixed options.
- Patient who is motivated, agreed with the follow-up visits and willing to return for follow-up appointments.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with absolute contraindications that interfere with surgical placement and osseointegration of implants as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, generalized osteoporosis, recent myocardial infarction, patient with radiotherapy.
- Patient with relative contraindication such as UN controlled diabetes mellitus, moderate smoking and alcoholism, patient with TMJ disorder and heavy smokers for more than10 cigarettes per day.
- Patient with local contra indication as insufficient bone quality, localized lesion in canine area and premolar area, unfavourable position of the lower alveolar or mental nerve, bone defects as verified by cone beam CT.
- Uncooperative patient.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35516, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2023
First Posted
September 22, 2023
Study Start
December 21, 2022
Primary Completion
December 27, 2023
Study Completion
December 17, 2024
Last Updated
December 20, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share