Patient Preferences for Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Cancer Screening Tests
1 other identifier
observational
556
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study plans to learn more about what patients think about screening for esophageal cancer (EAC) and Barrett's esophagus (BE); a pre-cancerous condition associated with esophageal cancer. The plan is to use this information to modify screening practices in the United States with the goal to decrease the number of people who die from esophageal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2024
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2029
November 18, 2024
November 1, 2024
4.3 years
November 14, 2024
November 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Define patient preferred BE/EAC screening test and barriers for attributes of BE/EAC screening tests
A discrete choice-based conjoint analysis survey evaluating 5 domains: benefit of detection (sensitivity), convenience (time, setting), screening related physical harms (procedural discomfort), and financial harms will be used to determine the relative importance of BE/EAC screening test characteristics and patient priorities. Survey data will be reported in aggregate and factors and choices will be analyzed using the Fisher Exact and Mann-Whitney rank-sum tests. This approach will elicit the overall preferred test and differences in each test attribute that informed the patients choice.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Characterization of differences in BE/EAC test preferences by patient sociodemographic characteristics and by patient presence or absence of GERD
Baseline
Study Arms (1)
Patients
556 eligible patients will be recruited across 5 participating sites to complete a discrete choice-based conjoint survey. The survey will be distributed to eligible patients via Sawtooth internet survey at the time of a clinic appointment or remotely via video chat.
Interventions
To assess patient preferences and barriers for attributes of BE/EAC screening modalities patients will complete a survey evaluating 5 domains: benefit of detection (sensitivity), convenience (time, setting), screening related physical harms (procedural discomfort), and financial harms. Prior to distribution, the survey will be refined and pretested among a sample of 5 patients.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with 3 or more established risk factors for BE who have at least one outpatient clinic visit at a participating site. Patients will be identified at primary care and family medicine clinics. Patients with prior diagnosis of BE/EAC will be excluded. Across the 5 sites, planned enrollment is 556.
You may qualify if:
- Provision to sign and date the consent form.
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study.
- Individual has 3 or more established risk factors for BE (age \> 50 years, chronic GERD, male, white race, smoking, obesity, family history of BE/EAC).
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to consent.
- Prior diagnosis of BE/EAC.
- Life limiting comorbidity/ disability.
- Active dementia/ cognitive impairment.
- Incarcerated.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denverlead
- American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopycollaborator
- University of California, Los Angelescollaborator
- University of Michigancollaborator
- Exact Sciences Corporationcollaborator
- VA Medical Center-West Los Angelescollaborator
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sachin Wani, MD
University of Colorado, Denver
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Kolb, MD, MS
University of California, Los Angeles
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2024
First Posted
November 18, 2024
Study Start
November 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2029
Last Updated
November 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 9 months to 36 months following article publication.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose. These data can only be used for individual participant data meta-analysis.
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in original publications after deidentification (text, tables, figures, appendixes).