Feasibility of Ambulatory Talc. Pleurodesis
Can Talc Pleurodesis for Malignant Pleural Effusion be Performed on an Ambulatory Basis
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with malignant pleural disease often experience a significant symptom burden and a short life expectancy. The cornerstone of their treatment is relieving breathlessness by draining fluid from around the lungs and attempting to prevent further fluid build up. Inpatient chest drainage and talc pleurodesis remains the most successful method of stopping the fluid build up but this often requires an average hospital stay of four days. This can be an inappropriate length of time for this patient group. Our study would investigate whether this treatment could be provided on an outpatient, ambulatory basis and facilitate a greater quality of life. The investigators would assess deliverability of the trial protocol and collect patient feedback to see if our patients consider it an acceptable and worthwhile intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 12, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 12, 2024
November 1, 2024
12 months
January 10, 2024
November 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success rate of delivery of the ambulatory pleruodesis protocol
Can the investigators successfully deliver the described ambulatory pleruodesis protocol within the 5 day time frame and what is the success rate of the protocol delivery.
5 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient satisfaction / Patient related outcome measurement
5 days
Patient satisfaction / Patient related outcome measurement
30 days
Study Arms (1)
outpatient drain and talc pleurodesis
EXPERIMENTALPatients enrolled to the trial will have a chest drain inserted and we will aim to drain to dryness and instill medical grade talc as described in the protocol
Interventions
a chest drain will be inserted, fluid drained and medical talc instilled on an ambulatory basis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Malignant pleural effusion
- Life expectancy \>30 days
- WHO PS 1-2 (3 if due to dyspnoea)
You may not qualify if:
- Previous failed pleurodesis (on affected side)
- Known non-expansile lung
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- David Rollinslead
Study Sites (1)
North Tees and Hartlepool NHS foundation trust
Stockton-on-Tees, County Durham, TS19 8PE, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kevin Conroy, MBBS, FRCP
University Hospital of North Tees
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research governance manager - TVRA
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2024
First Posted
November 12, 2024
Study Start
January 10, 2024
Primary Completion
January 1, 2025
Study Completion
February 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The primary end point of this trial is feasibility of intervention delivery. We will share our results and our protocol. All other outcomes are qualitative and will be reported at the end of the trial. Making individual participant data available to other researches does not seem necessary