ACP-Family Programme for Palliative Care Patients and Their Family Member
Effects of a Structured, Family-supported, Patient-centred Advance Care Planning for End-of-life Decision Among Palliative Care Patients and Their Family Members: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
170
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of a structured, family-supported, patient-centred advance care planning (ACP) in palliative care patients and their family members. The main question it aims to answer is: • the effectiveness of the ACP intervention on promoting end-of-life decision making and psychological outcomes in patients and family members. Participants will be assigned to either the ACP-Family group (ACP-Family) to receive a structured, family-supported, patient-centred ACP intervention or usual palliative care (ACP-UC) at the hospital. Researchers will compare the ACP-Family and ACP-UC groups to see if the ACP-Family group will produce better outcomes than the ACP-UC group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 19, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2025
CompletedOctober 10, 2024
August 1, 2024
1.7 years
June 29, 2023
October 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Family's prediction accuracy of patient's treatment preferences
Patients and family members will be asked independently to indicate patient's preferences regarding three life-sustaining treatments (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilator and tube feeding) based on three options (want to attempt, refuse or uncertain) in two hypothetical EOL scenarios (being terminally ill and in persistent vegetative state or a state of irreversible coma). An accuracy score will be calculated by summing the number of treatment decisions for which responses from the patient and family member are identical, and then dividing by the total number of decisions (n = 6), all equally weighted.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Family's prediction accuracy of patient's treatment preferences
12 months
New ACP documentation
6 and 12 months
Family-reported perception of whether the patient's EOL care preference was respected
6 and 12 months
Patient's decisional conflict
6 and 12 months
Quality of communication
6 and 12 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ACP-Family
EXPERIMENTALIt is a ACP discussion intervention consisting of two sessions (45-60 mins) and to be delivered within one month in a face-to-face format as long as the patient is still in the hospital by a trained ACP facilitator.
ACP-UC
NO INTERVENTIONUsual care that is available to all palliative care patients in the hospital.
Interventions
It consists of two sessions (45-60 mins) to be delivered within one month in a face-to-face format as long as the patient is still in the hospital. The treatment will be continued in the patient's home if he/she is discharged before the two sessions are completed. The treatment will cover five elements in ACP, namely (1) patients' understanding of their illness, (2) patients' values and beliefs underpinning care preferences, (3) possible health conditions in the future, (4) introducing the idea of AD and its arrangement, and (5) construction of the role of substituted decision maker. A 3-min video on end-of-life treatment options will be shown to help patients and family members to clearly understand the related topic. However, there will be no restriction on the order of the five topics to be discussed during the intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient:
- aged ≥ 18,
- receiving palliative care at the study hospitals,
- able to communicate in Cantonese, and
- cognitively intact (Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) score ≥ 7)13 at the time of recruitment
- Family member:
- aged≥ 18
- able to communicate in Cantonese, and
- nominated by the patient who is likely to make substituted decisions for the patient in future health care issues.
You may not qualify if:
- are engaging in ACP discussion with healthcare professionals in the hospital at the time of recruitment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universitylead
- Shatin Hospitalcollaborator
- United Christian Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Bradbury Hospice
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Shatin Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
United Christian Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (1)
Leung DYP, Chung JOK, Chan HYL, Lo RSK, Li K, Lam PT, Ng NHY. Effects of a structured, family-supported, and patient-centred advance care planning on end-of-life decision making among palliative care patients and their family members: protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Nov 7;23(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01588-z.
PMID: 39511666DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Doris YP Leung, PhD
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2023
First Posted
July 7, 2023
Study Start
September 19, 2023
Primary Completion
May 30, 2025
Study Completion
November 30, 2025
Last Updated
October 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data are not readily shared because permission to use the data by other researchers has to seek approval from the ethical committee. Requests to access IPD should be directed to PI for further consideration and seeking approval from ethical committee.