ICP for Patients With Complex Care Needs in Ontario and Alberta, Canada
Paving a Road Map for Integrated Care Evaluation in Canada: A Mixed Methods Evaluation for Patients With Complex Care Needs in Ontario and Alberta
2 other identifiers
interventional
2,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) model can reduce hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits while improving continuity of care. This model was first developed at the University Health Network in Toronto, Ontario, and has been adapted for patients at high risk of readmission and with medical/social vulnerability admitted to general medical units in the hospitals in Calgary, Alberta. The study will evaluate the ongoing adaption and implementation of the ICP model in Calgary. ICP patients will receive the following tenets of care:
- 24 hour access to phone support within the first 2 weeks of discharge from hospital, leveraging the ICP, community stakeholders and Healthlink from Alberta Health Services.
- Long-term support and follow-up in the community up to 90 days with goal of implementing and adapting the complex care plan to help patients access services and manage their chronic health conditions. The main study objectives are:
- To adapt and implement the ICP in Calgary's 4 hospitals over a 3 year period.
- To evaluate the implementation of the ICP in Calgary leveraging the Quintuple Aim Framework.
- How patients and their caregivers experienced their time in hospital and transition home.
- How healthcare providers feel about the ICP's impact on patient care.
- The ICP's impact on patient health outcomes,
- The use of hospital resources, and the cost of providing care.
- The ICP's impact on equity, or fair access to healthcare resources and services.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2028
March 28, 2025
March 1, 2025
3.6 years
November 5, 2024
March 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient experience
Proportion of patients reporting a positive experience up to three months following discharge from an acute care hospital, as defined by having the following top box (positive) responses to seven patient experience questions from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Canadian Patient Experience Survey on Inpatient Care (CPES-IC) , a standardized and validated survey sent out by all hospitals in English and/or French (see Appendix for all questions). Response options include ordinal frequencies or binary responses to questions focused on communication and care coordination (e.g., "During this hospital stay, did doctors, nurses, or other hospital staff talk with you about whether you would have the help needed when you left hospital?"). The choice of top-box response to patient experience survey questions is being used to align with Canadian benchmarking and for comparison with HCAHPS patient experience survey questions for international representation ,.
From enrollment to 90 days post-discharge
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Re-admission
up to 3 months after discharge
Other Outcomes (1)
Quintuple Aim - a conceptual framework for evaluating quality of healthcare services developed by the Institute of Healthcare Improvement for evaluating new health programs
minimum 6 months post-implementation of ICP at all sites
Study Arms (1)
Integrated care pathway supported by the integrated care lead
EXPERIMENTALEnrolled patients in the ICP will then undergo more assessment by the Integrated Care Lead to develop a preliminary inventory of their needs for transitioning back to their health home. Patients will then be assigned an Integrated Care Lead with expertise in managing their particular needs. This will result in the development of a complex care plan that is co-designed with a patient's acute and community care team (eg: primary care, home care, community services, hospital medical team etc). This plan will be documented in Connect Care and incorporated into the discharge summary at the time of hospital discharge. (see Appendix 2) Calgary Zone Integrated Care Program will then provide: * Continuity of care with the assigned ICP team member(s) throughout their hospitalization and connection with community resources and services in the process of complex discharge planning. * Efficient use of healthcare resources by reducing duplication of services and systematically screening for unmet
Interventions
Complex care plan facilitated by the integrated care lead with 90 day follow-up, 24/7 phone support and connection with resources and services
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- PATIENTS:
- Over 18 years of age
- Able to provide informed consent, or has substitute-decision-maker and is able to provide assent.
- Resides in Calgary Zone
- High risk of readmission and/or social vulnerability:
- medical vulnerablility - includes multimorbidity (2+ medical conditions requiring ongoing monitoring, frailty, polypharmacy, high risk of readmissions/death)
- psychosocial vulnerability - includes social, financial or behavioural challenges that impede a patient from accessing healthcare or other services without extra support
- Attached to primary care or has potential for access to health resources can be reasonably obtained in the short-term via access clinics or community agency follow-up.
- Community-dwelling
- CAREGIVER
- Informal caregiver (friend/family) of a patient enrolled in ICP (eg: provides support in form of care at home, transportation / going to appointments, managing finances etc)
- Provides informed consent to participate in the study.
- PROVIDERS
- Healthcare professional working in the program, or having had a patient enrolled in the program within the past 3 months (eg: nurse, doctor, allied health professional etc)
- Provides informed consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- \) Patient characteristics:
- Competent patient and/or substitute decision-maker who declines to provide informed consent to participate in ICP program
- On Mental Health Form 1 / active psychosis / suicide risk / intoxication
- Patients without valid health coverage data
- Patients that are critically ill and likely to die in hospital
- \) Alternative care arrangements / pathways or not in catchment
- Individuals being discharged to Supportive Living / Long-term care / rehabilitation
- Patients requiring end-of-life care
- Resides outside of Calgary Zone
- In police custody
- \) Non-hospital medicine populations
- Pediatric (17 years or younger)
- Admitted to surgery, obstetrics/gynecology
- Admitted to a psychiatric ward
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2V 5A8, Canada
Related Publications (11)
Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, Noonan R, Lubell K, Stillman L, Blachman M, Dunville R, Saul J. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):171-81. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z.
PMID: 18302018BACKGROUNDNundy S, Cooper LA, Mate KS. The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement: A New Imperative to Advance Health Equity. JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):521-522. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.25181. No abstract available.
PMID: 35061006BACKGROUNDMeyers DC, Durlak JA, Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Dec;50(3-4):462-80. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x.
PMID: 22644083BACKGROUNDSteele Gray C, Zonneveld N, Breton M, Wankah P, Shaw J, Anderson GM, Wodchis WP. Comparing International Models of Integrated Care: How Can We Learn Across Borders? Int J Integr Care. 2020 Apr 1;20(1):14. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5413.
PMID: 32292312BACKGROUNDKiran T, Wells D, Okrainec K, Kennedy C, Devotta K, Mabaya G, Phillips L, Lang A, O'Campo P. Patient and caregiver experience in the transition from hospital to home - brainstorming results from group concept mapping: a patient-oriented study. CMAJ Open. 2020 Mar 2;8(1):E121-E133. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190009. Print 2020 Jan-Mar.
PMID: 32127383BACKGROUNDHunting G, Shahid N, Sahakyan Y, Fan I, Moneypenny CR, Stanimirovic A, North T, Petrosyan Y, Krahn MD, Rac VE. A multi-level qualitative analysis of Telehomecare in Ontario: challenges and opportunities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 9;15:544. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1196-2.
PMID: 26645639BACKGROUNDHahn-Goldberg S, Huynh T, Chaput A, Krahn M, Rac V, Tomlinson G, Matelski J, Abrams H, Bell C, Madho C, Ferguson C, Turcotte A, Free C, Hogan S, Nicholas B, Oldershaw B, Okrainec K. Implementation, spread and impact of the Patient Oriented Discharge Summary (PODS) across Ontario hospitals: a mixed methods evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 17;21(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06374-8.
PMID: 33865385BACKGROUNDIsaac T, Zaslavsky AM, Cleary PD, Landon BE. The relationship between patients' perception of care and measures of hospital quality and safety. Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug;45(4):1024-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01122.x. Epub 2010 May 28.
PMID: 20528990BACKGROUNDGriffiths S, Stephen G, Kiran T, Okrainec K. "She knows me best": a qualitative study of patient and caregiver views on the role of the primary care physician follow-up post-hospital discharge in individuals admitted with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or congestive heart failure. BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Sep 7;22(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01524-7.
PMID: 34488652BACKGROUNDOkrainec K, Chaput A, Rac VE, Tomlinson G, Matelski J, Robson M, Troup A, Krahn M, Hahn-Goldberg S. Raising the bar for patient experience during care transitions in Canada: A repeated cross-sectional survey evaluating a patient-oriented discharge summary at Ontario hospitals. PLoS One. 2022 Oct 4;17(10):e0268418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268418. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36194600BACKGROUNDOkrainec K, Hahn-Goldberg S, Abrams H, Bell CM, Soong C, Hart M, Shea B, Schmidt S, Troup A, Jeffs L. Patients' and caregivers' perspectives on factors that influence understanding of and adherence to hospital discharge instructions: a qualitative study. CMAJ Open. 2019 Jul 18;7(3):E478-E483. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180208. Print 2019 Jul-Sep.
PMID: 31320331BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michelle Grinman, MD FRCPC MPH
University of Calgary
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2024
First Posted
November 7, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Last Updated
March 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share