Effects of Cognitive Versus Task Oriented Training on Balance, Gait and Daily Activity in Chronic Stroke Patients
Effects of Cognitive Sensorimotor Exercises Versus Task Oriented Training on Balance ,Gait and Activities of Daily Living in Chronic Stroke Patients.
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine effects of cognitive sensorimotor exercises versus task oriented training on balance, gait and activities of daily living in chronic stroke patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 28, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2025
CompletedFebruary 21, 2025
February 1, 2025
9 months
October 28, 2024
February 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
The BBS (Berg Balance Scale)
The BBS (Berg Balance Scale) comprises 14 items aimed at evaluating balance function in older adults residing in the community. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with a total score range of 0 to 56. Higher scores indicate better balance function. The scale exhibits robust psychometric properties, including good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92-0.98), strong interrater reliability (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.97), and favorable concurrent validity (high correlations \[r = 0.91-0.95\] with the PASS and the Static Balance Test).
10 months
The DGI (Dynamic Gait Index)
The DGI (Dynamic Gait Index) is an eight-item assessment tool designed to evaluate balance, functional mobility, and gait. Notably, the evaluation setting lacked stairs, prompting subjective patient reporting for the stair climbing item to facilitate completion of the measure. Importantly, research supports that omitting the stair component does not compromise the validity or integrity of the DGI. Each of the eight DGI items is scored on a 4-point scale, where a score of 3 indicates no gait dysfunction, 2 reflects minimal dysfunction, 1 represents moderate dysfunction, and 0 denotes severe dysfunction. The total maximum score achievable is 24. The test can be administered in approximately 10 minutes,
10 months
The Modified Barthel Index
The Modified Barthel Index is a 100-point scale used to assess a patient's proficiency in performing 10 types of Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Each ADL is assigned a numeric value based on the level of assistance the patient requires. Lower scores on the MBI suggest decreased independence, while higher scores indicate greater self-sufficiency. A perfect score of 100 signifies complete independence in basic ADL, whereas the minimum score of 0 indicates total dependence on assistance for these activities. The MBI provides a quantitative measure of an individual's functional status in daily tasks, aiding in the evaluation of their overall independence.
10 months
Study Arms (2)
cognitive sensorimotor exercise group
EXPERIMENTALPatients in group A will receive cognitive sensorimotor exercises for 30 minutes, sessions for 5 days per week for 8 weeks.
Task based training group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in group B will receive task oriented training for 30 minutes, sessions for 5 days per week for 8 weeks.
Interventions
Patients in group A will receive cognitive sensorimotor exercises for 30 minutes, sessions for 5 days per week for 8 weeks.
Patients in group B will receive task oriented training for 30 minutes, sessions for 5 days per week for 8 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with chronic stroke (6 months to 2 years)
- Patients with the ability to walk independently using aids or orthotics with or without supervision.
- Ability to communicate and follow instructions.
- No problem walking due to ankle contracture.
- No sensory deficiencies of the lower extremities.
- Patients cognition level on MMSE ≥ 24
You may not qualify if:
- Recent injuries- Patients having musculoskeletal or surgical problems of lower extremity.
- Co-morbid conditions- Cardiovascular (uncontrolled high blood pressure, diabetes), respiratory problems like dyspnoea.
- Neurological conditions- like brain tumour, demyelinating disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis).
- Subjects with auditory and vestibular disorders.
- Cerebellar related problems.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ripah Internationa University
Islamabad, Fedral, 44000, Pakistan
Related Publications (3)
Kim KH, Jang SH. Effects of Cognitive Sensory Motor Training on Lower Extremity Muscle Strength and Balance in Post Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study. Clin Pract. 2021 Sep 14;11(3):640-649. doi: 10.3390/clinpract11030079.
PMID: 34563008BACKGROUNDSutcu G, Ozcakar L, Yalcin AI, Kilinc M. BOBATH vs. TASK-ORIENTED TRAINING AFTER STROKE: An assessor-blind randomized controlled trial. Brain Inj. 2023 Jun 7;37(7):581-587. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2023.2203519. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
PMID: 37074234BACKGROUNDGhrouz A, Guillen-Sola A, Morgado-Perez A, Munoz-Redondo E, Ramirez-Fuentes C, Curbelo Pena Y, Duarte E. The effect of a motor relearning on balance and postural control in patients after stroke: An open-label randomized controlled trial. Eur Stroke J. 2024 Jun;9(2):303-311. doi: 10.1177/23969873231220218. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
PMID: 38158722BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
zeest Z hashmi, MSNMPT
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 28, 2024
First Posted
October 29, 2024
Study Start
April 1, 2024
Primary Completion
January 1, 2025
Study Completion
January 15, 2025
Last Updated
February 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share