Irrigation Activating Techniques on Irrigant Penetration Depth and Microbial Reduction
Effect of Different Irrigation Activating Techniques on Irrigant Penetration Depth and Microbial Reduction in Root Canals (Clinical Study)
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This in-vivo study aim to evaluate effect of different irrigation activating techniques on Irrigant Penetration Depth and Microbial Reduction in root Canals
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2025
CompletedOctober 28, 2024
October 1, 2024
9 months
October 25, 2024
October 25, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
measurment of penetration depth of irrigant
measurment the difference between the working length and penetration depth of irrigant
at the same 1 day visit
measurment of bacterial reduction following different irrigation activating techniques
collection of 3 samples followed by culturing on blood agar and counting to calculate percentage of bacterial reduction
24-28 hours after culturing
Study Arms (3)
• Group 1: Manual dynamic agitation by matching gutta-percha master cones
ACTIVE COMPARATORmatching gutta-percha master cones will be used in up and down motion 2mm amplitude at a frequency of 100 strokes during approximately 1 min in each prepared canal.
Group 3: Easy Clean system activation
ACTIVE COMPARATOREC instrument coupled to the countrangle handpiece and operated with a micromotor at approximately 20,000 rotations per minute in continuous rotation.
Group 2: XP-endo Finisher activation
ACTIVE COMPARATORXP-endo Finisher used in continuous rotation for 1 minute accompanied with in-and-out movements of approximately 7-mm amplitude will be applied to the instrument according to the manufacturer's recommendations⁸
Interventions
The first microbial sample (S1) will be taken from the root canal immediately after access cavity preparation and before chemomechanical preparation.Samples will be subjected to bacterial viable count using blood agar. After complete chemomechanical preparation, a second microbial samble (S2) will be taken and managed the same way as S1.After irrigation activation protocol by matching gutta percha master cone , S3 will be collected from each root canal and managed as S1, S2 to evaluate effect of activation techniques on microbial reduction ,canals will be dried with a matching paper point then 1 mL of Iohexol (omnipaque) contrast media will be injected 2mL shorter than WL and activated by a matching gutta percha master cone , a digital radiographic image will be obtained for each tooth with the same angulation as that for WL and then the distance between WL and maximum irrigant penetration will be measured and recorded using SIDEXIS-XG software.
The first microbial sample (S1) will be taken from the root canal immediately after access cavity preparation and before chemomechanical preparation.Samples will be subjected to bacterial viable count using blood agar. After complete chemomechanical preparation, a second microbial samble (S2) will be taken and managed the same way as S1.After irrigation activation protocol by XP-endo Finisher used in continuous rotation for 1 minute , S3 will be collected from each root canal and managed as S1, S2 to evaluate effect of activation techniques on microbial reduction ,canals will be dried with a matching paper point then 1 mL of Iohexol (omnipaque) contrast media will be injected 2mL shorter than WL and activated by a matching gutta percha master cone , a digital radiographic image will be obtained for each tooth with the same angulation as that for WL and then the distance between WL and maximum irrigant penetration will be measured and recorded using SIDEXIS-XG software.
after access cavity preparation and before chemomechanical preparation.Samples will be subjected to bacterial viable count using blood agar. After complete chemomechanical preparation, a second microbial samble (S2) will be taken and managed the same way as S1.After irrigation activation protocol by EasyClean system activation , S3 will be collected from each root canal and managed as S1, S2 to evaluate effect of activation techniques on microbial reduction ,canals will be dried with a matching paper point then 1 mL of Iohexol (omnipaque) contrast media will be injected 2mL shorter than WL and activated by a matching gutta percha master cone , a digital radiographic image will be obtained for each tooth with the same angulation as that for WL and then the distance between WL and maximum irrigant penetration will be measured and recorded using SIDEXIS-XG software.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Asymptomatic vital/non vital teeth requiring root canal treatment.
- Teeth with sound periodontal apparatus.
- Teeth without pus or inflammatory exudates draining through the canal.
- Teeth without anatomic variations.
- Teeth with sinus tract.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with any systemic diseases.
- Pregnant or lactating patients.
- Immunocompromised patients.
- Apparently thin roots in which apical preparation with #40 or #50 file would be overzealous.
- Patient allergic to anything used in this procedure especially rubber dam material and Iohexol (radiographic contrast media).
- Retreatment cases. Teeth with calcified canals.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tanta Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry
Tanta, Egypt
Related Publications (2)
Andreani Y, Gad BT, Cocks TC, Harrison J, Keresztes ME, Pomfret JK, Rees EB, Ma D, Baloun BL, Rahimi M. Comparison of irrigant activation devices and conventional needle irrigation on smear layer and debris removal in curved canals. (Smear layer removal from irrigant activation using SEM). Aust Endod J. 2021 Aug;47(2):143-149. doi: 10.1111/aej.12482. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
PMID: 33682268BACKGROUNDde Souza DS, S Silva AS, Ormiga F, Lopes RT, Gusman H. The effectiveness of passive ultrasonic irrigation and the easy-clean instrument for removing remnants of filling material. J Conserv Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb;24(1):57-62. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_590_20. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
PMID: 34475681BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ali Mahmoud Farag, Phd
Professor of Endodontics
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Dalia Abd Elhameed Sherif, Phd
Lecturer of Endodontics
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kareman Ahmed Ebrahim Eshra, Phd
Professor of clinical Microbiology and Immunology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2024
First Posted
October 28, 2024
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion
March 1, 2025
Study Completion
April 1, 2025
Last Updated
October 28, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share