Time Efficiency and Obturation Quality of Rotary Versus Manual in Primary Teeth
1 other identifier
interventional
41
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of obturation and the time efficiency of rotary versus manual instrumentation in roots of deciduous molars clinically where the:
- Primary objective Is to evaluate the time efficiency
- Secondary objective Is to evaluate the quality of obturation Clinical and radiographical follow up will be performed for 18 months to investigate the clinical and the radiographic success for the Conventional and Rotary groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2022
CompletedFebruary 21, 2023
February 1, 2023
2.3 years
September 17, 2019
February 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Is to evaluate the time efficiency of the rotary mm files versus manual stainless steel k files in the pulpectomy of lower second primary molars affecting the positive behavior of the child
Time efficiency of instrumentation using rotary mm files specially designed for primary teeth versus manual stainless steel K-files in the pulpectomy of mandibular second primary molars, by clinical and radiographic evaluation for 18 months.
up to 18 months
Is to evaluate and compare the quality of obturation using two different obturation techniques following instrumentation by rotary mm files and manual stainless steel k files instrumentation in another group
The quality of obturation using ZOE will be performed with either the incremental technique or the modified disposable syringe technique, following instrumentation by rotary and manual files, where the grading will be as : 1: overfilled, 2: underfilled 3: optimum filling.
up to 18 months
Study Arms (4)
Rotary instrumentation using MM files 1
EXPERIMENTALRotary instrumentation using MM files (IMD Inc, China), sizes 20-25-30 taper 0.4, length 16 mm, then obturation with Zinc oxide and Eugenol using Incremental filling Technique.
Manual instrumentation using K-files 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORManual instrumentation using K-files (Mani Inc, Tochigi, Japan), sizes 15-20-25-30-35 then obturation with Zinc oxide and Eugenol using Incremental filling Technique.
Rotary instrumentation using MM files 2
EXPERIMENTALRotary instrumentation using MM files (IMD Inc, China), sizes 20-25-30 taper 0.4, length 16 mm, then obturation with Zinc oxide and Eugenol using Disposable syringe technique.
Manual instrumentation using K-files 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORManual instrumentation using K-files (Mani Inc, Tochigi, Japan), sizes 15-20-25-30-35 then obturation with Zinc oxide and Eugenol using Disposable syringe technique
Interventions
Rotary instrumenation used in pulp therapy
manual instrumentation used in pulp therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children included in the study should conform to the following criteria:
- Patients between ages 4-7 years old with at least one mandibular vital or non-vital primary molar indicated for pulpectomy will be selected.
- Absence of periapical or interadicular radiolucencies, inflammatory root resorption, sinus tract or gingival abscess.
- No physiological root resorption.
- The teeth should have enough coronal structure for full coverage Stainless-Steel crowns.
You may not qualify if:
- \. Children who are extremely uncooperative and difficult to manage 2. Children suffering from any physically or mentally disability that will complicate the treatment: Special Health Care needs (SHCN) 3. Teeth of poor prognosis due to presence of an abscess or a sinus, mobility, advanced bone or root resorption or Non-Restorable teeth.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams Univeristy
Cairo, 02, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2019
First Posted
September 25, 2019
Study Start
September 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2021
Study Completion
January 1, 2022
Last Updated
February 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share