NCT06652750

Brief Summary

Objective: This clinical study employs a prospective, paired, self-controlled, non-inferiority, multicenter research design to assess the safety and efficacy of utilizing 5G cloud follow-up for CIED in parameters monitoring and remote programming post-implantation. Participants will: undergo regular clinic follow-up visits in accordance with the guidelines undergo routine in-office follow-up and 5G cloud follow-up during each regular clinic visit

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
688

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 10, 2024

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2024

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 13, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

November 21, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

October 10, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 18, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

pacemakerimplantable cardioverter defibrillatorcardiac resynchronization therapyfollow upremote programmingin-office follow-up

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Parameter Measurement Consistency

    Subjects underwent in-office follow-up and 5G cloud follow-up to test battery parameters (battery voltage, battery current, and magnet frequency) and lead parameters (amplitude, pacing threshold, and impedance) in the immediate postoperative period, prior to discharge from the hospital, and within 1 month of implantation, within 1 to 3 months of implantation, at 6 months of implantation, and at 12 months of implantation, respectively. The consistency of each parameter measured at both follow-up modalities was analyzed at the end of the trial by regression fitting equations and Pearson correlation coefficients.

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Parameter Measurement Time

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Program Completion Rate

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • adverse events

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Study Arms (1)

5G cloud follow-up & Routine follow-up

EXPERIMENTAL

CIED patients undergo both 5G cloud follow-up and routine in-office follow-up during each visit.

Other: Routine ManagementDevice: 5G Cloud Follow-up

Interventions

Conducting routine in-office follow-up for CIED paitents

5G cloud follow-up & Routine follow-up

This study employed a 5G-cloud follow-up platform, a research tool that allows a device specialist to test, and program CIEDs in real-time from a remote location via an internet connection or mobile wireless network. Consistent with of the 5G remote support terminal externally connected to the programmer, a PAD was installed with a 5G-cloud follow-up app. The onsite medical staff began the cloud follow-up session by contacting the remote device specialist via video call. The connection to the CIED was made by the medical staff through the use of a standard programmer. He was in charge of turning on the programmer and applying the programmer wand to the patient's device. After an initial introduction, communication was established and continued via the wand connection. The remote device specialist logged into the 5G-cloud follow-up app with two-step verification. The remote device specialist then had complete control of the programmer to check and reprogram the device as needed.

5G cloud follow-up & Routine follow-up

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years, gender unspecified;
  • Patients who have not undergone their first clinic follow-up after the implantation of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED); Note: In this study, CIED includes pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (CRT-P) and defibrillators (CRT-D), excluding implantable cardiac event recorders (ICM) and implantable cardiovascular monitors.
  • Willing to participate in this clinical study and have signed the informed consent form in writing.

You may not qualify if:

  • If meeting any of the following, the individual cannot be included:
  • Life expectancy \< 1 year.
  • Inability to cooperate with treatment or follow-up, such as having mental illness.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China

RECRUITING

The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu

Chengdu, Sichuan, 610000, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Xiong S, Qin S, Tong L, Long Y, Luo Y, Feng Q, Peng X, Jiang M, Xiong F, Li J, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Liu H, Cai L. The clinical use of remote parameter testing during cardiac implantable electronic devices implantation procedures: a single center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 22;11:1364940. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1364940. eCollection 2024.

    PMID: 38586175BACKGROUND
  • Xiong S, Li J, Tong L, Hou J, Yang S, Qi L, Chen X, Luo Y, Zhang Z, Liu H, Cai L. Realtime Remote Programming in Patients Carrying Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Requiring Emergent Reprogramming. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 16;9:871425. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.871425. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35651905BACKGROUND
  • Tong L, Xiong S, Hou J, Li J, Qin S, Zhang Y, Yang S, Qi L, Chen X, Luo Y, Zhang Z, Deng H, Liu H, Cai L. Cloud Follow-Up in Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices: A Single-Region Study in China. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 9;9:864398. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.864398. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35615564BACKGROUND
  • Tong L, Long Y, Xiong S, Li J, Huang W, Liu H, Cai L. Application of Postoperative Remote Follow-Up of CIED Based on the 5G Cloud Technology Support Platform in Areas With Underdeveloped Medical Resources. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 17;9:894345. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.894345. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35783847BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sick Sinus SyndromeAtrioventricular BlockNeoplasm MetastasisHeart Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmia, SinusArrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesHeart BlockCardiac Conduction System DiseasePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeoplastic ProcessesNeoplasms

Central Study Contacts

Lin Cai, master of medicine

CONTACT

Shiqiang Xiong, Doctor of Medicine(M.D.)

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: During each session, the CIED patient undergoes both the experimental and control methods.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Department of Cardiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2024

First Posted

October 22, 2024

Study Start

November 13, 2024

Primary Completion

February 1, 2025

Study Completion

February 1, 2026

Last Updated

November 21, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Locations