NCT06652568

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to confirm the safety and efficacy of ThinkSono Guidance, a software data collection and communication tool designed to collect ultrasound data to help detect blood clots in veins. The ThinkSono system is CE Mark approved in the European Union and in clinical use in Europe. Usually, when an ultrasound is conducted to detect blood clots in veins, a sonographer (trained technologist who conducts ultrasounds) and/or radiologist will conduct the procedure, including a compression ultrasound exam, and the scan may require a bulky cart and ultrasound equipment. ThinkSono Guidance is a mobile software application that enables other healthcare professionals such as nurses, non-radiologist physicians including general practitioners, and other allied healthcare professionals to perform the ultrasound at the point of care using guidance from the software app. This is a multi-site non-randomized, double-blinded, prospective cohort pivotal study.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
634

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 8, 2023

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 12, 2024

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 8, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 8, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 25, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 25, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

October 12, 2024

Results QC Date

December 28, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 5, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Deep vein thrombosisArtificial intelligenceMachine learningUltrasound

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Image Quality Adequacy

    ThinkSono Guidance achieves adequate image quality with an American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) score equal to or greater than 3 in at least 60% of scans to show that non-ultrasound-trained operators can acquire relevant cine-loops (an expectation ≥75%, lower CI ≥60%). The ACEP score is a score on a scale of 1-5 assessing utilized as the national standard for image quality evaluation. Further information is available at: https://www.acep.org/siteassets/uploads/uploaded-files/acep/clinical-and-practice-management/policy-statements/information-papers/emergency-ultrasound-standard-reporting-guidelines---2018.pdf.

    Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes).

  • Triage Sensitivity

    The sensitivity for overall triage performance for proximal DVT is at least 85%.

    Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes).

  • Triage Specificity

    The specificity for overall triage performance for proximal DVT is at least 30%.

    Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes).

  • Prioritization Specificity

    Prioritization specificity quantifies how reliably the system identifies patients who merit high-urgency imaging specialist assessment based on their ThinkSono scans. A high prioritization specificity means that there are very few false-positive scans that lead to patients being prioritized unnecessarily. Further details are available in the trial protocol and statistical analysis plan. ThinkSono Guidance achieves specificity for prioritizing patients of at least 93%. This means that at least 93% of scans without proximal lower extremity DVT were not labeled as false positives by reviewers of ThinkSono Guidance scans.

    Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes).

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Predictive Values

    Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes).

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Serial Ultrasound Sensitivity

    Measured at the time of ThinkSono Guidance scanning, during scan review by qualified clinicians, and during simulation of serial ultrasound scanning.

Study Arms (1)

Single Arm

OTHER

This arm of patients will undergo an ultrasound scan using the ThinkSono system and a comparison standard of care duplex ultrasound scan.

Device: ThinkSono System

Interventions

The ThinkSono Guidance System is a guidance software expected to help non-radiology specialist healthcare professionals produce compression ultrasound image data that meet or exceed the minimal image quality criteria for a remote diagnosis by an expert (e.g. radiologist).

Single Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The participant is willing to provide written informed consent to participate in this research.
  • The participant is over the age of 18
  • The participant has symptoms suggestive of a deep venous thrombosis (DVT)
  • The diagnostic DVT algorithm indicates that an ultrasound is needed

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient consent not given or retracted during the study.
  • Local imaging specialists fail to scan the patient or fail to produce a conclusive imaging diagnosis.
  • Incomplete ThinkSono Guidance scan due to logistical or other issues such as pain, lack of patient cooperation, barriers such as a cast or other physical limitations.
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients who undergo a local imaging scan and initiation of new treatment for DVT (e.g. lytic agents, therapeutic anticoagulation, or intervention after the local imaging scan) before a ThinkSono scan can be performed.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

NYU Langone Health

New York, New York, 10016, United States

Location

Temple Health

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140, United States

Location

Allegheny Health Network

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States

Location

South Texas Veterans Health System

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

Location

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Nothnagel K, Aslam MF. Evaluating the benefits of machine learning for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis compared with gold standard ultrasound: a feasibility study. BJGP Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(4):BJGPO.2024.0057. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0057. Print 2024 Dec.

    PMID: 38866404BACKGROUND
  • Poulikidis KP, Gasparis AP, Labropoulos N. Prospective analysis of incidence, extent and chronicity of lower extremity venous thrombosis. Phlebology. 2014 Feb;29(1):37-42. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2012.012086. Epub 2013 May 6.

    PMID: 23131597BACKGROUND
  • Grosse SD, Nelson RE, Nyarko KA, Richardson LC, Raskob GE. The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs. Thromb Res. 2016 Jan;137:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.11.033. Epub 2015 Nov 24.

    PMID: 26654719BACKGROUND
  • Prandoni P, Kahn SR. Post-thrombotic syndrome: prevalence, prognostication and need for progress. Br J Haematol. 2009 May;145(3):286-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07601.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

    PMID: 19222476BACKGROUND
  • Roberts LN, Patel RK, Donaldson N, Bonner L, Arya R. Post-thrombotic syndrome is an independent determinant of health-related quality of life following both first proximal and distal deep vein thrombosis. Haematologica. 2014 Mar;99(3):e41-3. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.089870. Epub 2014 Jan 17. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24441147BACKGROUND
  • Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE, Ginsberg JS. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. McMaster Diagnostic Imaging Practice Guidelines Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Apr 15;128(8):663-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-8-199804150-00011.

    PMID: 9537941BACKGROUND
  • Kainz B, Heinrich MP, Makropoulos A, Oppenheimer J, Mandegaran R, Sankar S, Deane C, Mischkewitz S, Al-Noor F, Rawdin AC, Ruttloff A, Stevenson MD, Klein-Weigel P, Curry N. Non-invasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis from ultrasound imaging with machine learning. NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Sep 15;4(1):137. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00503-7.

    PMID: 34526639BACKGROUND
  • Oppenheimer J, Mandegaran R, Staabs F, Adler A, Singohl S, Kainz B, Heinrich M, Geroulakos G, Spiliopoulos S, Avgerinos E. Remote Expert DVT Triaging of Novice-User Compression Sonography with AI-Guidance. Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Feb;99:272-279. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.022. Epub 2023 Oct 10.

    PMID: 37820986BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Venous ThrombosisPulmonary Embolism

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ThrombosisEmbolism and ThrombosisVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesEmbolism

Results Point of Contact

Title
Giancarlo Speranza MD, MBA
Organization
ThinkSono, Ltd.

Study Officials

  • Glenn Jacobowitz, MD

    Northwell Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Though not masked, the study is double blinded. Double blinding will be ensured by the ThinkSono software, as it will not be giving any indication of diagnosis or image quality to the operator. The comparison scan will be done by a qualified imaging specialist as per the standard of care at the local institution, but they will also not know the results of the ThinkSono scan. There will also be "remote qualified clinicians" reviewing the ThinkSono data (separately from local staff) who also will not know the results of the local imaging specialist. Only at the final data assessment upon study completion will outcome assessors be aware of ThinkSono device results and local site imaging results.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Single arm comparison study between the ThinkSono device and standard of care venous duplex ultrasound.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2024

First Posted

October 22, 2024

Study Start

November 8, 2023

Primary Completion

December 8, 2025

Study Completion

December 8, 2025

Last Updated

March 25, 2026

Results First Posted

March 25, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations