Identify the Most Effective Rehabilitation Method Between a Treatment with a Sensorized Treadmill (Walker View) and a Treatment with Conventional Group Therapy in Balance Disorders and the Use of Artificial Intelligence to Identify Predictive Indices to Prevent Falls and Diagnose Promptly the Risk
UAI
Comparison Between Treatment with Sensorized Treadmill and Conventional Therapy in Balance Disorders and Use of Artificial Intelligence in Identifying Predictive and Prognostic Indices of the Risk of Falling in Balance Disorders in Adult-elderly Subjects
2 other identifiers
interventional
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Falls in the elderly are one of the main sources of disability and hospitalization, with a significant impact on quality of life and social and healthcare costs. Falls represent a significant health concern for people over 60 years old. Numerous studies have shown that falls cause serious health consequences. Around 30% of people over the age of 60 experience a fall during the year. According to the impact falls have, the investigators decided to analyze the effectiveness of training on a Walker View sensorized treadmill, with the possibility of exercises for coordination and balance, compared to training with a conventional group therapy, in order to understand the best training to reduce the risk of falling and observe the possible improvements in daily life activities. So the study aims to identify the most effective rehabilitation method between a treatment with a sensorized treadmill (Walker View) and a conventional group therapy in balance disorders. The study also aims to identify predictive indices, with the use of Artificial Intelligence, that can contribute to the prevention and diagnosis of balance disorders in a short time and prevent falls in the elderly.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 4, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
ExpectedMarch 19, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.4 years
October 14, 2024
March 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Step Length of Gait Analysis
The Gait Analysis is used to assess individuals with conditions that affect their ability to walk. It is a useful test for studying gait, thanks to instruments that measure the load on each limb and walking in general. It allows us to evaluate progresses at different time frames.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Balance
Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks
Mobility
Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks
Risk of falling
Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks
Daily Living
Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks
Instrumental Activites of Daily Living
Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Experimental Sensorized Treadmill
EXPERIMENTALPatients will carry out treatment with a sensorized treadmill, Walker View. This treadmill gives the possibility to patients to see their image reconstructed in a 3D mode in order to observe the bad aligments that increase the patients balance disorders. The feedback systems are necessary to give continuous stimulation to the patients. Each patients will carry out 18 treatment sessions and each session will last 30 minutes
Conventional Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this arm will carry out treatment with a conventional group therapy, consisting in usual treatment according to current clinical practice. Each patient will undergo 18 sessions of conventional therapy based on group re-education.
Clinical monitoring
NO INTERVENTIONPatients in this arm will take part in the 'no intervention' part of the study and they will not carry out treatment. Patients will undergo only a clinical monitoring with an educational intervention, which does not elvove treatment or exercises, and they will continue to follow their daily habits.
Interventions
The Walker View system is a treadmill equipped with a loaded cell sensor belt and a 3D camera that allows you to detect every single angular movement of the subject. Furthermore, thanks to the two optics, a classic one for 2D shooting in high resolution, and a revolutionary one for infrared rays, it is possible to reconstruct the position of the subject in space in three-dimensional mode and in real time. The reflected image reconstructed by the system helps to improve movement through the \"continuous feedback system\" method.
Conventional therapy intervention will follow the usual treatment according to current clinical practice. This treatment will be delivered to patients in a group session in order the balance disorders.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 65 years
- Consent to participate in the study
- Positive history of balance disorders
- Absence of cognitive deficits (MMSE ≥ 24)
- Tinetti \< 25
You may not qualify if:
- Clinical pictures associated with musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, neuro-psychic problems and post-surgical outcomes that make the planned evaluation tests unfeasible.
- Inability to carry out a walking test.
- History of more than one fall in the last six months.
- Subjects who have not expressed informed consent to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico di Roma
Rome, Rome, 00128, Italy
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2024
First Posted
October 18, 2024
Study Start
December 4, 2024
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03