The Effect of a Game on the Development of Leadership Behaviors of Nursing Students
RCT
The Effect of "NurseLead in Progress" Game on the Development of Transformational Leadership Behaviors of Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the effect of a leadership role-playing computer game on nursing students' leadership practices. The main questions it aims to answer are: RQ1: Will participants in the intervention group perform better on the Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership Achievement Test (5PELAT) after the game?
- RQ1a: Is the average score of the intervention group on the Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership Achievement Test significantly higher than the average score of the control group after the game?
- RQ1b: Is the difference between pre-test and post-test scores on the Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership Achievement Test significantly greater in the intervention group compared to the control group? RQ2: Will participants in the intervention group report higher self-assessments of their own leadership practices after the game compared to the control group?
- RQ2a: Is the average score of the intervention group on the Student Leadership Practices Inventory (SLPI) significantly higher than the average score of the control group after the game?
- RQ2b: Is the difference between pre-test and post-test scores on the Student Leadership Practices Inventory significantly greater in the intervention group compared to the control group? Researchers will compare the leadership course \& game playing intervention to only getting the leadership course to see if the combined version works better in developing nursing students' transformational leadership. Participants will:
- Take the leadership course and play the leadership game or only take the course.
- Complete Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership Achievement Test (5PELAT) and the Student Leadership Practices Inventory (SLPI) before and after the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2025
CompletedFebruary 4, 2025
February 1, 2025
22 days
October 9, 2024
February 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Transformational Leadership Development (Objective)
Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership Achievement Test (5PELAT) The 5PELAT is a test developed by the authors, comprising 10 questions, each featuring 5 response options based on various sample scenarios. These scenarios are analyzed in alignment with the Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership model. Each question and its corresponding answers have been crafted in collaboration with subject matter experts and refined through feedback from an expert panel, ensuring their relevance and effectiveness in evaluating leadership. This development process aims to provide reliable insights into participants' understanding and application of exemplary leadership practices.
Before the interventions, in both groups (baseline) 2 weeks after the interventions, in both groups. (1st measurement) 4 weeks after the interventions, in both groups. (2nd measurement) In total, time frame is 6 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Transformational Leadership Development (Perspective)
Before the interventions, in both groups (baseline) 2 weeks after the interventions, in both groups. (1st measurement) 4 weeks after the interventions, in both groups. (2nd measurement) In total, time frame is 6 weeks.
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants who will complete the leadership course and then engage in the leadership game
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants who will complete the leadership course only.
Interventions
This two-hour course, based on the Five Exemplary Leadership Model, aims to refresh participants' theoretical understanding of leadership while providing insights into effective leader-follower interactions through practical scenarios. The session will begin with an exploration of the nature of leadership, including its philosophical and historical context. The significance of leadership in nursing will be emphasized, highlighting its impact on education, clinical practice, and the profession overall. Participants will examine the key roles of nurse leaders, focusing on modeling the way, inspiring a shared vision, challenging the process, enabling others to act, and encouraging the heart. Content Outline: 1. The Nature and Definition of Leadership (5 minutes) 2. Leadership and Its Importance in Nursing (15 minutes) 3. Transformational Leadership and Its Components (40 minutes) 4. Positive Leader-Follower Interactions (15 minutes) 5. Case Study Discussions (45 minutes)
Developed collaboratively by the author and a company, this unpublished game focuses on role-playing leader-follower interactions to navigate scenarios effectively. Designed for five students per session, the game consists of five sections, lasting approximately one hour, with each section corresponding to one of the Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership. In each section, one student takes on the role of leader while the other four act as followers. The main objective is to guide a newly appointed charge nurse in making sound decisions when facing challenges to achieve key goals. Following the game, a debriefing session will allow participants to analyze responses with experts. Performance will not be formally evaluated, as the game serves as a learning experience, enabling students to lead and engage as followers. This activity aims to activate the experiential learning phase of Kolb's Learning Model.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must be between 18 and 25 years old.
- Informed consent must be obtained from the participant.
- Participants must have no visual and/or hearing impairments.
- Participants must be students in a four-year nursing bachelor's program.
- Participants must be in the 3rd or 4th year of their bachelor's program.
- Participants must have completed a leadership course during their bachelor's education.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals who are younger than 18 or older than 25 years old.
- Individuals with visual and/or hearing impairments.
- Individuals who are currently receiving or have received training related to leadership outside of their program.
- Individuals holding a diploma in a field other than nursing.
- Individuals currently studying in a field other than nursing.
- Individuals who have suspended their bachelor's education.
- Individuals who are in the preparatory year, 1st, or 2nd year of the bachelor's program.
- Individuals who have not taken any leadership-related courses during their bachelor's education.
- Individuals with a conflict of interest due to close relationships with the researchers.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Canberk Akdenizlead
Study Sites (1)
HEP-SEN Union - Ankara Prof. Dr. Perihan Velioglu Branch
Ankara, Cankaya, 06530, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (13)
Tunn R, Boutron I, Chan AW, Collins GS, Hrobjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, de Beyer JA, Hansen Nejstgaard C, Ostengaard L, Hopewell S. Methods used to develop the SPIRIT 2024 and CONSORT 2024 Statements. J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 May;169:111309. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111309. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
PMID: 38428538BACKGROUNDMarath, U., Ramachandra, (2015). Impact of Leadership Development Package on Leadership Competencies of Undergraduate Nursing Students. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research 5(2): April-June 2015; Page221-228. doi: 10.5958/2349-2996.2015.00044.0
BACKGROUNDKuruca Ozdemir E, Dinc L. Game-based learning in undergraduate nursing education: A systematic review of mixed-method studies. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Jul;62:103375. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103375. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
PMID: 35749962BACKGROUNDKouzes, James M., Barry Z. Posner. (2017). The Leadership Challenge 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
BACKGROUNDKouzes, James M., Barry Z. Posner. (2013). The Student Leadership Challenge: Facilitation and Activity Guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
BACKGROUNDKolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
BACKGROUNDFoli KJ, Braswell M, Kirkpatrick J, Lim E. Development of leadership behaviors in undergraduate nursing students: a service-learning approach. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):76-82. doi: 10.5480/11-578.1.
PMID: 24783721BACKGROUNDDenney, Logan R., "Student Leadership Development: A Focus on Experiential Leadership Orientation Within Higher Education" (2013). Master of Arts in Higher Education (MAHE) Theses. 94. https://pillars.taylor.edu/mahe/94
BACKGROUNDPetit dit Dariel OJ, Raby T, Ravaut F, Rothan-Tondeur M. Developing the Serious Games potential in nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Dec;33(12):1569-75. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.12.014. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
PMID: 23332500BACKGROUNDCurtis EA, de Vries J, Sheerin FK. Developing leadership in nursing: exploring core factors. Br J Nurs. 2011 Mar 10-23;20(5):306-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2011.20.5.306.
PMID: 21471879BACKGROUNDBoctor L. Active-learning strategies: the use of a game to reinforce learning in nursing education. A case study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013 Mar;13(2):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
PMID: 22910398BACKGROUNDBlakely G, Skirton H, Cooper S, Allum P, Nelmes P. Educational gaming in the health sciences: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2009 Feb;65(2):259-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04843.x. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
PMID: 19032512BACKGROUNDAkdeniz C, Duygulu S. Systematic Review on Characteristics and Effects of Leadership Development Interventions for Nursing Students. Nurse Educ. 2024 May-Jun 01;49(3):E147-E152. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001540. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
PMID: 37994497BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Canberk Akdeniz
HEP-SEN Union (Senior Advisor)
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sergül Duygulu, Prof.
Hacettepe University Nursing Faculty
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Expert A will assess the students' eligibility based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. From those who qualify, Expert B will use specialized software to randomly select 50 participants through systematic random sampling. An independent Expert C will then randomly assign these 50 students to either the control or intervention groups using block randomization. Expert D will administer the pre- and post-tests, which will then be sent to statisticians for analysis. After the statistical results are received and reported, the researchers will know which students were in the control or intervention group. The intervention group will participate in the game first, while the control group will be placed on a waitlist and will play the game after the statistical analysis is completed. Although the control group will also have the opportunity to develop their leadership skills through the game, their performance will not be evaluated post-play.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator. PhD Candidate at Hacettepe University Institute of Health Sciences, Türkiye, enrolled in the Nursing Fundamentals and Management Integrated PhD Program.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2024
First Posted
October 15, 2024
Study Start
January 10, 2025
Primary Completion
February 1, 2025
Study Completion
February 1, 2025
Last Updated
February 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Beginning 1 year after publication with no end date
- Access Criteria
- Individual participant data (IPD) will be made available upon request to researchers-excluding those affiliated with or funded by a company-who wish to conduct a systematic review, meta-analysis, or sample size calculations. Only the inventory scores (including score values but not item details-due to Wiley requirements) will be shared. Researchers seeking access to the IPD must contact both authors, and both must provide consent for data sharing.
We intend to upload the raw, de-identified data to Mendeley Data. The publication of the dataset will be contingent upon the manuscript's publication, following the completion of all necessary processes.