Assessment of Oncological Safety, Quality of Life, and Environmental Impact of the Green Breast Surgery Protocol
BuGs
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Breast Cancer (BC) is the primary oncological diagnosis in women, with the annual incidence expected to exceed 3 million new cases by 2040 due to population growth and aging. During the COVID-19 pandemic, novel methods were adopted worldwide to provide continuous patient care, including telehealth, fast-track protocols such as awake surgery in breast cancer. These innovative techniques allowed for improved access to care, and additionally reduced emissions with environmental impact, better resource utilization, and improved continuity of care, but their impact post-pandemic era has not been investigated. A current issue is the environmental impact of hospitals, particularly operating rooms, as it has been analysed that 25-30% of hospital waste comes from these areas. A Breast Green Surgery protocol (BuGS protocol) has been designed to reduce Breast Surgery Impact of care, evaluating for the synergistic effect of different procedure for the first time on classic Clincal Outcome, Patients' Reported Outcome Measure (PROM), and Environment Related Outcome Measure (EROM) in breast cancer surgery. Main hypothesis is that BuGs protocol will provide a significant reduction in carbon footprint of care (EROM) without impacting clinical outcome and PROMs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2025
CompletedOctober 3, 2024
September 1, 2024
5 months
September 11, 2024
September 30, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
24 h Post-operative pain at rest
Postoperative Pain at rest with Numeric Pain Rating Scale NPRS (0-10)
24 hours after surgery
24 h Post-operative dynamic pain
Postoperative dynamic Pain with Numeric Pain Rating Scale NPRS (0-10)
24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Number of hospital admissions after surgery
30 days after surgery
Assessment Telehealth implementation
30 days after surgery
Patients' reported outcome measures
30 days after surgery
Patients' reported outcome measures
30 days after surgery
Patients' reported outcome measures
30 days after surgery
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Carbon footprint of private patient transport to the hospital
30 days after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Green Breast Surgery
EXPERIMENTALPreoperative assessment: Counsel patients before admission. * Encourage 1 month of no alcohol and smoking before surgery. * Recommend weight loss for BMI \> 30 with exercise. Operative assessment: * Admit to Day Surgery Unit. * Allow clear liquids until 2 hours before surgery. * Give maltodextrin 2 hours prior to surgery. * Prescribe antibiotic prophylaxis if needed. * Prescribe post-op anti-nausea/vomiting medication. * Use Awake Breast Surgery Protocol with Peripheral Nerve Blocks (ESP or PECS1). * Follow Intercollage Green Theatre checklist. * Post-operative assessment: Apply personalized DVT prophylaxis. * Allow food and water shortly after surgery. * Encourage mobilization a few hours post-surgery. * Use telemedicine for first follow-ups and later as needed. * Scheduled Time Frame pain (NRS scale) and quality of life (PSQ-18, SF-36, QoL, Breast-Q, TSQ-WT) assessment * Check for complications 30 days after surgery.
Conventional Surgery
NO INTERVENTIONPreoperative assessment: Counsel patients before admission. * Encourage 1 month of no alcohol and smoking before surgery. * Recommend weight loss for BMI \> 30 with exercise. Operative assessment: * Admit to surgical unit according to the surgeon preference * Allow clear liquids until 2 hours before surgery. * Give maltodextrin 2 hours prior to surgery. * Prescribe antibiotic prophylaxis if needed. * Prescribe post-op anti-nausea/vomiting medication. * Intraoperative management according to Surgeon and Anesthesiologist Post-operative assessment: * Apply personalized DVT prophylaxis. * Allow food and water shortly after surgery. * Encourage mobilization according to the intraoperative managment. * Use telemedicine for first follow-ups and later as needed. * Scheduled Time Frame pain (NRS scale) and quality of life (PSQ-18, SF-36, QoL, Breast-Q, TSQ-WT) assessment * Check for complications 30 days after surgery.
Interventions
A perioperative protocol aiming at reducing environmental impact of surgery, and fast recovery protocol to reduce hospitalization.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients candidates for Breast Conserving Treatment
- ASA score I-II
- Availability to Telehealth assessment in the postoperative period
You may not qualify if:
- Drug addiction
- contraindication for locoregional ultrasound-guided procedure (e.g., local infection, allergy to LA)
- chronic pain under treatment
- pregnancy
- No follow-up planned in our facility
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata
Roma, 00133, Italy
Related Publications (3)
Materazzo M., Facchini A., Garozzo D., Buonomo C., Pellicciaro M., Vanni G. Maintaining good practice in breast cancer management and reducing the carbon footprint of care: study protocol and preliminary results WCRJ 2022; 9: e2438 DOI: 10.32113/wcrj_202211_2438
BACKGROUNDVanni G, Caiazza G, Materazzo M, Storti G, Pellicciaro M, Buonomo C, Natoli S, Fabbi E, Dauri M. Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Serratus Plane Block in Breast Conserving Surgery: Alpha Randomized Controlled Trial. Anticancer Res. 2021 Nov;41(11):5667-5676. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15383.
PMID: 34732440BACKGROUNDVanni G, Materazzo M, Pellicciaro M, Marino D, Buonomo OC. From Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) to Environment Related Outcome Measure (EROM): Towards "Green Breast Surgery". In Vivo. 2023 Jul-Aug;37(4):1867-1872. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13278.
PMID: 37369495BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gianluca Vanni, PhD
University of Rome Tor Vergata
- STUDY CHAIR
Oreste Claudio Buonomo, Full Prof
University of Rome Tor Vergata
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Once enrolled patients were randomized to receive
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2024
First Posted
October 3, 2024
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
January 1, 2025
Last Updated
October 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share