Axillary Management After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The standard treatment for locally advanced and node-positive breast cancer is surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Using NAC in advanced-stage tumors and biologically aggressive subtypes can lead to de-escalation in surgical treatment for the breast and axilla. Previously, NAC was believed to alter lymphatic drainage due to fibrosis and tumor emboli in lymphatic channels. However, the theAmerican College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1071 and Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA) trials investigated the performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after NAC in patients with proven axillary lymph node involvement at the initial biopsy. In contemporary breast cancer management, particularly in the axillary approach, less invasive techniques are becoming increasingly common. This raises the question of whether there might be a patient group where SLNB could be avoided. In this study, the investigators sought a new method to evaluate the axilla after NAC in patients with known axillary involvement previously. For this purpose, the investigators performed an ultrasound-guided needle biopsy on the clipped axillary lymph node with known metastasis before the planned surgery, aiming to assess the axilla without performing SLNB after treatment. Additionally, the investigators investigated which patient group might benefit more from this predictability based on molecular subtypes and clinical-pathological features.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 23, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 12, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2024
CompletedMarch 13, 2024
March 1, 2024
4 months
July 18, 2023
March 12, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Prediction of axillary status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy without SLNB
In this study, the investigators sought a new method to evaluate the axilla after NAC in patients with known axillary involvement previously. For this purpose, the investigators performed an ultrasound-guided needle biopsy on the clipped axillary lymph node with known metastasis before the planned surgery, aiming to assess the axilla without performing SLNB after treatment.
through study completion, an average of 6 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The investigators investigated which patient group might benefit more from this prediction based on molecular subtypes and the clinical-pathological features
through study completion, an average of 6 month
Study Arms (2)
Group 1 = Fine needle aspiration biopsy
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Group A, patients with axillary metastasis identified by FNAB were subjected to repeat ultrasound-guided FNAB after completion of neoadjuvant treatment, The obtained biopsies were sent for histopathological evaluation without revealing patient names to avoid influencing the research results, and the surgical team was not informed of the biopsy results. During surgery, both dyed lymph nodes and clipped lymph nodes were excised for SLNB and assessed by frozen section evaluation.
Group 2 = Core biopsy
ACTIVE COMPARATORin Group B, patients with axillary metastasis identified by CNB underwent repeat biopsy using the same method after completing neoadjuvant treatment.The obtained biopsies were sent for histopathological evaluation without revealing patient names to avoid influencing the research results, and the surgical team was not informed of the biopsy results. During surgery, both dyed lymph nodes and clipped lymph nodes were excised for SLNB and assessed by frozen section evaluation.
Interventions
For SLNB evaluation, multiple sections of the excised lymph node were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) at a thickness greater than 2 mm. Lymph nodes with metastasis greater than 2 mm were defined as positive SLNB. Macroscopic metastasis was considered positive in the evaluation for the axilla, while benign histological characteristics were considered negative. The presence of micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells was also noted. The size and diameter of the metastatic lymph node were considered in the evaluation. SLNB technique using isosulfan blue dye was performed for axillary evaluation, and all patients had the clipped lymph node excised under ultrasound guidance with a guide wire placed preoperatively.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years-old female patients
- Clinical stage T1-3 and biopsy-proven N1 breast cancer
- Axillary nodal involvement
- Volunteer to participate in to study
You may not qualify if:
- A history of axillary surgery or SLNB, prior axillary excisional lymph node surgery,
- N2-3 disease with a decision for initial axillary lymph node dissection (ALND),
- Diagnosis of inflammatory breast cancer,
- Presence of distant metastasis
- Incomplete chemotherapy, pregnancy, and lactation
- T4 tumors
- Refusal to participate in to study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Istanbul, Bagcilar, 34083, Turkey (Türkiye)
Istanbul Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, 34083, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
You S, Kang DK, Jung YS, An YS, Jeon GS, Kim TH. Evaluation of lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: comparison of diagnostic performance of ultrasound, MRI and (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT. Br J Radiol. 2015 Aug;88(1052):20150143. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150143.
PMID: 26110204BACKGROUNDHa SM, Cha JH, Kim HH, Shin HJ, Chae EY, Choi WJ. Diagnostic performance of breast ultrasonography and MRI in the prediction of lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Acta Radiol. 2017 Oct;58(10):1198-1205. doi: 10.1177/0284185117690421. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
PMID: 28350255BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pelin Basim, As. prof, MD
Medipol University / General Surgery Department
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emine YILDIRIM, As. prof, MD
Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital / General Surgery Department
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2023
First Posted
October 23, 2023
Study Start
March 12, 2024
Primary Completion
June 30, 2024
Study Completion
August 15, 2024
Last Updated
March 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We will not share individual participant data