Determining Which Regions of the Brain Are Active During Flight Simulation at Separate Timepoints During Training
fMRI Pilots
2 other identifiers
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The overall objective is to identify the cognitive circuits associated with military aviator performance by analyzing what anatomic regions of the brain are functionally "active" (neuronal circuit) while being performing virtual flight simulations, the Precision Instrument Control Task (PICT). The flight simulation test will be conducted at two separate timepoints while the subject is receiving a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) scan to evaluate which anatomic and functional brain function is associated with precise performance. By scanning at multiple time points we aim to quantify changes in functional and anatomic connectivity that occur throughout the course of training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 19, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 18, 2026
ExpectedJanuary 15, 2025
January 1, 2025
2.5 years
September 19, 2024
January 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Flight simulation scores of responses (reaction times and latency)
Assess the flight simulation scores of responses (reaction times and latency) to the anatomical and functional regions of the brain that react when performing corrective flight actions. This will occur by analyzing anatomical MRI and fMRI imaging data and correlate with simulator performance.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 30 months
Study Arms (1)
Functional (fMRI) and anatomic MRI imaging a two timepoints during pilot virtual reality simulation
EXPERIMENTALInitial anatomic imaging and fMRI with virtual reality flight simulator scan with repeat testing performed at approximately 2 months (+/- 1 month) after initial scan.
Interventions
During this scan, the subject will be wearing the stereogenic goggles called the Visual System HD (NordicNeuroLab) mounted in the scanner via a headcoil that can be adjusted to the subject's comfort using the control arm and completely cover the eyes to prevent light exposure and to clearly visualize eye movement during the flight simulation. The subject will be using a visual response system with customized grips to simulate a stick and throttle in a jet cockpit while visualizing the flight simulation (PICT) in the goggles.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Active Duty Military Pilots (Instructor Pilot Trainees or Remote Piloted Aircraft Trainees)
- Age 18-54 years
- Biological male or female
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years
- Age \> 60 years
- Non-active-duty members
- History of recurrent migraine headaches requiring chronic suppressive medication or prescription drug intervention more frequently than once per year.
- History of head trauma or traumatic brain injury with any loss of consciousness or with confusion or amnesia of greater than five minutes.
- History of eye trauma related to a metallic object unless the presence of residual metal has been previously excluded by x-ray.
- Pregnancy
- History of significant neurological disease including cerebrovascular disease, demyelinating disease, or infections of the central nervous system (encephalitis, meningitis).
- History of medical conditions with potential neurological involvement such as obstructive sleep apnea, autoimmune disorders, etc.
- History of seizures since age six.
- Claustrophobia or intolerance of the MRI without medication.
- Any medical contraindication to MRI (ex: foreign bodies, non-MRI compatible pacemaker, metal devices).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Geneva Foundationlead
- 59th Medical Wingcollaborator
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciencescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Joint Base San Antonio - Randolph & Lackland
San Antonio, Texas, 78150, United States
Related Publications (19)
Grady CL, Rieck JR, Nichol D, Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM. Influence of sample size and analytic approach on stability and interpretation of brain-behavior correlations in task-related fMRI data. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Jan;42(1):204-219. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25217. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
PMID: 32996635BACKGROUNDBeer J, Dart TS, Fischer J, Kisner J. Pulmonary Effects from a Simulated Long-Duration Mission in a Confined Cockpit. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017 Oct 1;88(10):952-957. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4854.2017.
PMID: 28923145BACKGROUNDTurner BO, Paul EJ, Miller MB, Barbey AK. Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies. Commun Biol. 2018 Jun 7;1:62. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0073-z. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30271944BACKGROUNDLi CX, Patel S, Zhang X. Evaluation of multi-shell diffusion MRI acquisition strategy on quantitative analysis using multi-compartment models. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Apr;10(4):824-834. doi: 10.21037/qims.2020.03.11.
PMID: 32355646BACKGROUNDBhushan C, Haldar JP, Choi S, Joshi AA, Shattuck DW, Leahy RM. Co-registration and distortion correction of diffusion and anatomical images based on inverse contrast normalization. Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 15;115:269-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.050. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
PMID: 25827811BACKGROUNDGonzalez-Castillo J, Panwar P, Buchanan LC, Caballero-Gaudes C, Handwerker DA, Jangraw DC, Zachariou V, Inati S, Roopchansingh V, Derbyshire JA, Bandettini PA. Evaluation of multi-echo ICA denoising for task based fMRI studies: Block designs, rapid event-related designs, and cardiac-gated fMRI. Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 1;141:452-468. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.049. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
PMID: 27475290BACKGROUNDLynch CJ, Power JD, Scult MA, Dubin M, Gunning FM, Liston C. Rapid Precision Functional Mapping of Individuals Using Multi-Echo fMRI. Cell Rep. 2020 Dec 22;33(12):108540. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108540.
PMID: 33357444BACKGROUNDTan ET, Shih RY, Mitra J, Sprenger T, Hua Y, Bhushan C, Bernstein MA, McNab JA, DeMarco JK, Ho VB, Foo TKF. Oscillating diffusion-encoding with a high gradient-amplitude and high slew-rate head-only gradient for human brain imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2020 Aug;84(2):950-965. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28180. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
PMID: 32011027BACKGROUNDTan ET, Hua Y, Fiveland EW, Vermilyea ME, Piel JE, Park KJ, Ho VB, Foo TKF. Peripheral nerve stimulation limits of a high amplitude and slew rate magnetic field gradient coil for neuroimaging. Magn Reson Med. 2020 Jan;83(1):352-366. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27909. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
PMID: 31385628BACKGROUNDFoo TKF, Tan ET, Vermilyea ME, Hua Y, Fiveland EW, Piel JE, Park K, Ricci J, Thompson PS, Graziani D, Conte G, Kagan A, Bai Y, Vasil C, Tarasek M, Yeo DTB, Snell F, Lee D, Dean A, DeMarco JK, Shih RY, Hood MN, Chae H, Ho VB. Highly efficient head-only magnetic field insert gradient coil for achieving simultaneous high gradient amplitude and slew rate at 3.0T (MAGNUS) for brain microstructure imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2020 Jun;83(6):2356-2369. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28087. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
PMID: 31763726BACKGROUNDCallan DE, Terzibas C, Cassel DB, Callan A, Kawato M, Sato MA. Differential activation of brain regions involved with error-feedback and imitation based motor simulation when observing self and an expert's actions in pilots and non-pilots on a complex glider landing task. Neuroimage. 2013 May 15;72:55-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.028. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
PMID: 23357079BACKGROUNDCallan DE, Gamez M, Cassel DB, Terzibas C, Callan A, Kawato M, Sato MA. Dynamic visuomotor transformation involved with remote flying of a plane utilizes the 'Mirror Neuron' system. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033873. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
PMID: 22536320BACKGROUNDDurantin G, Dehais F, Gonthier N, Terzibas C, Callan DE. Neural signature of inattentional deafness. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Nov;38(11):5440-5455. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23735. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
PMID: 28744950BACKGROUNDGougelet RJ, Terzibas C, Callan DE. Cerebellum, Basal Ganglia, and Cortex Mediate Performance of an Aerial Pursuit Task. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Feb 14;14:29. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00029. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32116611BACKGROUNDMehta RK, Parasuraman R. Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Dec 23;7:889. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889.
PMID: 24391575BACKGROUNDCisek P, Kalaska JF. Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:269-98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135409.
PMID: 20345247BACKGROUNDVan de Putte E, De Baene W, Garcia-Penton L, Woumans E, Dijkgraaf A, Duyck W. Anatomical and functional changes in the brain after simultaneous interpreting training: A longitudinal study. Cortex. 2018 Feb;99:243-257. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.024. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
PMID: 29291529BACKGROUNDDeYoe EA, Bandettini P, Neitz J, Miller D, Winans P. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) of the human brain. J Neurosci Methods. 1994 Oct;54(2):171-87. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90191-0.
PMID: 7869750BACKGROUNDTesch PA, Hjort H, Balldin UI. Effects of strength training on G tolerance. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1983 Aug;54(8):691-5.
PMID: 6626076BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul Sherman, MD
59th Medical Wing Science and Technology
Central Study Contacts
Katherine Walker-Rodriguez, Program Manager, MSN
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2024
First Posted
September 23, 2024
Study Start
September 19, 2023
Primary Completion
March 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 18, 2026
Last Updated
January 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Dept of Defense Active Duty Personnel, no data repository for this study.