NCT06601933

Brief Summary

Effective, clinically meaningful treatments are lacking for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which is associated with increased risk of transition to dementia. Cognitive training represents an important therapeutic strategy. In a previous study, crossword puzzles were found to be superior to computerized cognitive training on the primary cognitive outcome and function with decreased brain atrophy. Building on these findings, this study will evaluate and compare the impact of high dose crosswords (4 puzzles per week) to low dose crosswords (1 puzzle per week) and a health education control group on the cognition and function of participants.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
240

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
34mo left

Started Dec 2024

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress33%
Dec 2024Feb 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 16, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 19, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 17, 2024

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2029

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2029

Last Updated

October 31, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

September 16, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Mild Cognitive ImpairmentCognitive TrainingCrossword PuzzlesHealth Education

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in ADASCog-14 (14-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive subscale)

    The ADASCog-14 is a brief neuropsychological assessment used to assess the severity of cognitive symptoms of dementia. It is one of the most widely used cognitive scales in clinical trials and is considered to be the "gold standard" for assessing antidementia treatments. The total score range is 0 to 90; a higher score indicates greater cognitive impairment.

    Baseline, 78 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) score

    Baseline, 78 weeks

  • Change in MRI hippocampal volume

    Baseline, 78 weeks

  • Change in cortical thickness

    Baseline, 78 weeks

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Change in Preclinical Alzheimer Composite-5 (PACC5)

    Baseline, 78 weeks

  • Change in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL-PI)

    Baseline, 78 weeks

  • plasma neurofilament light and ptau 217

    Baseline, 78 weeks

Study Arms (3)

Control

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

This sample will receive health education. The participant will read chapters from the book, "Living a Healthy Life with chronic conditions," 5th edition, by K Lorig, D Laurent, V Gonzalez, D Sobel, M Minor and M Gecht-Silver, and review chapters with the unblinded study coordinator.

Other: Cognitive Training

Low Dose Crossword

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This sample will receive low dose crossword training with one crossword puzzle per week during the first 12 weeks on the Cognifit web-based platform. Subsequent booster sessions will occur at 20, 32, 42, 52, 64 and 78 weeks.

Other: Cognitive Training

High Dose Crossword

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This sample will receive high dose crossword training. This sample will receive high dose crossword training with four crossword puzzles per week during the first 12 weeks on the Cognifit web-based platform, followed by booster sessions at 20, 32, 42, 52, 64 and 78 weeks.

Other: Cognitive Training

Interventions

Participants (n=240) will be randomized to high dose crosswords, low dose crosswords, and health education at 1:1:1 ratio, stratified by site, age (\< 70 and 70 years), and MCI status (early MCI and late MCI). In the two crossword puzzles conditions, after initial training to use the web-based platform, the participant will be assigned to do 12 weeks of crossword puzzles four times per week or 12 weeks of crossword puzzles once per week at home. After these 12 weeks, booster sessions will be either four or one 30-minute session(s) completed over 1 week. These booster sessions will occur at weeks 20, 32, 42, 52, 64, and 78. In-person assessments will occur at 0, 12, 32, 52, 78 weeks with one crossword puzzle session, which will count toward the booster session. Health education will involve reading chapters in a book on common illnesses and lifestyle, and a research staff member will review these chapters at the same assessment intervals as the crossword puzzles conditions.

ControlHigh Dose CrosswordLow Dose Crossword

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Access to a home desktop or laptop computer or tablet at acceptable internet speed for the study duration.
  • Participants need to be 55 to 89 years of age (inclusive) at the time of informed consent.
  • Females need to be post-menopausal (last period more than 12 months earlier by history).
  • Subjective cognitive complaints, i.e., memory or other cognitive complaints, e.g., naming/language.
  • Meets criteria for cognitive impairment (CI), including either EMCI (early MCI) or LMCI (late MCI), defined as memory impairment documented by scoring below the education adjusted cutoff on the Logical Memory II subscale (Story A, Delayed Paragraph Recall) from the Wechsler Memory Scale - III (WMS-III) (the maximum score is 25). The criteria for MCI (includes EMCI and LMCI) and used in COGIT-2 are as follows: EMCI is defined by a WMS-III Logical memory delayed recall score of 3-6 with 0-7 years of education, score of 5-9 with 8-15 years of education, and score of 9-11 with 16 or more years of education. LMCI is defined by a WMS-III Logical Memory delayed recall score ≤ 2 with 0-7 years of education, score ≤ 4 with 8-15 years of education, and score ≤ 8 with ≥ 16 years of education.
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥ 20/30.
  • An informant (relative, friend, other caregiver) who contacts the participant at least weekly is required to provide information about the participant's functioning. This can be a telephone informant in the case of participants who do not have a live-in informant or close significant other. If the informant drops out, an alternate informant can be designated by the participant but the new informant will need to sign the informant information sheet in person.
  • Must be English-speaking: Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT3) score must indicate at least a 6th grade reading level with a score of ≥ 37.

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of dementia of any type.
  • Current clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, psychosis, or bipolar I disorder (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5 TR) criteria).
  • Current or recent (past 6 months) alcohol or substance use disorder (DSM-5 TR criteria).
  • Clinical stroke with residual neurological deficits. While we will not exclude participants with cerebrovascular disease or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), we do not wish to include participants with a frank clinical stroke because it is not clear that this type of participant is similar to the MCI participant generally, and clear-cut neurological impairment, e.g., hemiplegia/hemiparesis or speech impairment, may compromise the ability to do the procedures and to complete the neuropsychological test battery.
  • Presence of any of the following disorders: a) Central Nervous System Infections, with cerebrospinal fluid evidence of meningitis, encephalitis, or other infectious process; b) dementia of any type; c) Huntington's disease; d) Multiple sclerosis; e) Parkinson's disease; f) Other neurologic disorders with focal signs, e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
  • Regular use of crosswords or formal computerized cognitive training platforms averaging once per week or more than once per week in the past year. Eligible participants who join the trial are instructed not to do these procedures on their own during the trial, i.e., independent of the study.
  • Participation concurrently in another therapeutic clinical trial of a cognitive enhancing drug or device or procedure.
  • Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) score of ≥ 6.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Miami, Florida, 33136, United States

RECRUITING

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

New York, New York, 10032, United States

RECRUITING

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

RECRUITING

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (15)

  • Devanand DP, Goldberg TE, Qian M, Rushia SN, Sneed JR, Andrews HF, Nino I, Phillips J, Pence ST, Linares AR, Hellegers CA, Michael AM, Kerner NA, Petrella JR, Doraiswamy PM. Computerized Games versus Crosswords Training in Mild Cognitive Impairment. NEJM Evid. 2022 Dec;1(12):10.1056/evidoa2200121. doi: 10.1056/evidoa2200121. Epub 2022 Oct 27.

    PMID: 37635843BACKGROUND
  • Motter JN, Pelton GH, D'Antonio K, Rushia SN, Pimontel MA, Petrella JR, Garcon E, Ciovacco MW, Sneed JR, Doraiswamy PM, Devanand DP. Clinical and radiological characteristics of early versus late mild cognitive impairment in patients with comorbid depressive disorder. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;33(12):1604-1612. doi: 10.1002/gps.4955. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

    PMID: 30035339BACKGROUND
  • Pfeffer RI, Kurosaki TT, Harrah CH Jr, Chance JM, Filos S. Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. J Gerontol. 1982 May;37(3):323-9. doi: 10.1093/geronj/37.3.323.

    PMID: 7069156BACKGROUND
  • Liss JL, Seleri Assuncao S, Cummings J, Atri A, Geldmacher DS, Candela SF, Devanand DP, Fillit HM, Susman J, Mintzer J, Bittner T, Brunton SA, Kerwin DR, Jackson WC, Small GW, Grossberg GT, Clevenger CK, Cotter V, Stefanacci R, Wise-Brown A, Sabbagh MN. Practical recommendations for timely, accurate diagnosis of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (MCI and dementia) in primary care: a review and synthesis. J Intern Med. 2021 Aug;290(2):310-334. doi: 10.1111/joim.13244. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

    PMID: 33458891BACKGROUND
  • Segrave RA, Arnold S, Hoy K, Fitzgerald PB. Concurrent cognitive control training augments the antidepressant efficacy of tDCS: a pilot study. Brain Stimul. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.12.008. Epub 2013 Dec 19.

    PMID: 24486425BACKGROUND
  • Owens M, Koster EH, Derakshan N. Improving attention control in dysphoria through cognitive training: transfer effects on working memory capacity and filtering efficiency. Psychophysiology. 2013 Mar;50(3):297-307. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12010. Epub 2013 Jan 25.

    PMID: 23350956BACKGROUND
  • Lohman MC, Rebok GW, Spira AP, Parisi JM, Gross AL, Kueider AM. Depressive symptoms and memory performance among older adults: results from the ACTIVE memory training intervention. J Aging Health. 2013 Dec;25(8 Suppl):209S-29S. doi: 10.1177/0898264312460573. Epub 2012 Sep 23.

    PMID: 23006426BACKGROUND
  • Elgamal S, McKinnon MC, Ramakrishnan K, Joffe RT, MacQueen G. Successful computer-assisted cognitive remediation therapy in patients with unipolar depression: a proof of principle study. Psychol Med. 2007 Sep;37(9):1229-38. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707001110. Epub 2007 Jul 5.

    PMID: 17610766BACKGROUND
  • Rozzini L, Costardi D, Chilovi BV, Franzoni S, Trabucchi M, Padovani A. Efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation in patients with mild cognitive impairment treated with cholinesterase inhibitors. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;22(4):356-60. doi: 10.1002/gps.1681.

    PMID: 17117398BACKGROUND
  • Harvey PD, Zayas-Bazan M, Tibirica L, Kallestrup P, Czaja SJ. Improvements in Cognitive Performance With Computerized Training in Older People With and Without Cognitive Impairment: Synergistic Effects of Skills-Focused and Cognitive-Focused Strategies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;30(6):717-726. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 21.

    PMID: 34924275BACKGROUND
  • Valenzuela MJ, Sachdev P. Brain reserve and dementia: a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2006 Apr;36(4):441-54. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705006264. Epub 2005 Oct 6.

    PMID: 16207391BACKGROUND
  • Zissimopoulos J, Crimmins E, St Clair P. The Value of Delaying Alzheimer's Disease Onset. Forum Health Econ Policy. 2014 Nov;18(1):25-39. doi: 10.1515/fhep-2014-0013. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

    PMID: 27134606BACKGROUND
  • Wolinsky FD, Jones MP, Dotson MM. Does Visual Speed of Processing Training Improve Health-Related Quality of Life in Assisted and Independent Living Communities?: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Innov Aging. 2020 Jul 31;4(4):igaa029. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa029. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32964141BACKGROUND
  • Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. 2004 Sep;256(3):183-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01388.x.

    PMID: 15324362BACKGROUND
  • Wang LA, Goldberg TE, Harvey PD, Hanson AJ, Motter J, Andrews H, Qian M, Zhang R, Janis M, Doraiswamy PM, Devanand DP. Crossword puzzle training and neuroplasticity in mild cognitive impairment (COGIT-2): 78-week, multi-site, randomized controlled trial with cognitive, functional, imaging and biomarker outcomes. Int J Clin Trials. 2025 Apr-Jun;12(2):111-120. doi: 10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20251032. Epub 2025 Apr 11.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cognitive DysfunctionHealth Education

Interventions

Cognitive Training

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersAdherence InterventionsMedication AdherencePatient CompliancePatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurological RehabilitationRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Central Study Contacts

Davangere P Devanand, MD, MBBS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants will know their treatment condition. Study investigators and clinicians and blinded research coordinator who administers outcomes assessments remain blind to treatment condition.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Comparison of 3 treatment arms
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Psychiatry

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2024

First Posted

September 19, 2024

Study Start

December 17, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2029

Last Updated

October 31, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified participant data for all measures will be shared among investigators in the study.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
From October 15, 2024 until September 30, 2029

Locations