NCT06589011

Brief Summary

Postoperative atelectasis can cause postoperative hypoxia which might be avoided by applying pressure support during extubation of obese patients undergoing bariatric surgeries.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
170

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2024

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 5, 2024

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 19, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

September 5, 2024

Last Update Submit

September 5, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

pressure supportpostoperative atelectasisobese patientsbariatric surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • arterial Pao2

    Arterial blood sample was with drawn from the patients on room air after extubation

    immediately after arrival to the PACU within 10 minutes after extubation.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Postoperative atelectasis

    30 minutes after arrival to the PACU

  • respiratory rescue measures

    within 48 hours postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Pressure support

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The initial pressure support ventilation setting was a driving pressure of 7 cm H2O, PEEP of 5 cm H2O, and safety backup ventilation of 12 breaths/min (safety backup ventilation setting, VT, 8 ml/kg of predicted body weight; and PEEP, 5 cm H2O). The flow trigger and end of breath were set at 2 l/min and 30% of peak flow, respectively.

Other: Pressure Support Ventilation

control group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The emergence process was led by the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. The basic strategy was to allow the patient to breathe spontaneously and only help respiration if necessary, with intermittent manual assistance.

Other: spontaneously assisted breathing

Interventions

The initial pressure support ventilation setting was a driving pressure of 7 cm H2O, PEEP of 5 cm H2O, and safety backup ventilation of 12 breaths/min

Pressure support

The basic strategy was to allow the patient to breathe spontaneously and only help respiration if necessary, with intermittent manual assistance.

control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA I-III patients.
  • aged from 18-60 years old.
  • body mass index :(BMI) ≥ 35 Kg/m2 scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • age ≤18 or ≥ 60 years.
  • pregnant females.
  • underlying lung pathology, moderate to severe impairment of RFT, previous lung surgery, pneumothorax and pleural effusion.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Theodor Bilharz Research institute

Giza, Cairo Governorate, +020, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Young CC, Harris EM, Vacchiano C, Bodnar S, Bukowy B, Elliott RRD, Migliarese J, Ragains C, Trethewey B, Woodward A, Gama de Abreu M, Girard M, Futier E, Mulier JP, Pelosi P, Sprung J. Lung-protective ventilation for the surgical patient: international expert panel-based consensus recommendations. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;123(6):898-913. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

    PMID: 31587835BACKGROUND
  • van Kaam AH, Lachmann RA, Herting E, De Jaegere A, van Iwaarden F, Noorduyn LA, Kok JH, Haitsma JJ, Lachmann B. Reducing atelectasis attenuates bacterial growth and translocation in experimental pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 May 1;169(9):1046-53. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200312-1779OC. Epub 2004 Feb 20.

    PMID: 14977624BACKGROUND
  • Jeong H, Tanatporn P, Ahn HJ, Yang M, Kim JA, Yeo H, Kim W. Pressure Support versus Spontaneous Ventilation during Anesthetic Emergence-Effect on Postoperative Atelectasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2021 Dec 1;135(6):1004-1014. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003997.

    PMID: 34610099BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Atelectasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Moshira Sayed Lecturer of anesthesia and intensive care, M.D.

    Theodor Bilharz Research Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: pressure support versus spontaneous assisted ventilation during extubation from bariatric surgeries.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
lecturer of anesthesia and intensive care medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2024

First Posted

September 19, 2024

Study Start

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion

June 1, 2024

Study Completion

June 15, 2024

Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

data will be available upon request from the principal investigator

Locations