Patient-reported Outcomes and Esthetics With Single Dental Implants

NCT06571201 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: Single dental implants
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 45
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to investigate patient-reported long-term outcomes of single dental implants. Therefore, the aim of the study is to describe patient-reported functional and esthetic outcomes of single dental implants. A secondary aim is to evaluate the objective esthetics of single dental implants. The primary outcomes are patient-reported experiences regarding the function, cleaning ability, and esthetics of the single dental implant. The esthetics of the single dental implant will also be assessed using the Pink Esthetic/White Esthetic Score Index and considered secondary outcome.

Conditions

Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Patient Satisfaction; Implant Complication

Keywords

dental esthetics; patient reported outcome measurements; single dental implant

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• Patient- reported outcomes concerning function and cleaning of dental single implants

  Visual Analogue Scale 0=yes absolutely 10= absolutely not. Maximum=100 scores Minimum=0 scores

  At the dental examination

• Patient- reported outcomes concerning esthetics of dental single implants

  Visual Analogue Scale 0=not satisfied at all. 10=completely satisfied Maximum=40 scores Minimum=0 scores

  At the dental examination

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Pink and white esthetic scores for single dental implants

  15 years later

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 23 Years - 100 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing prosthetic single dental implant treatment at an Oral Prosthodontic Specialist Clinic in Kristianstad (Folktandvården, Public Dental Service Kristianstad, Sweden) between 1991-1996

You may qualify if:

• if only one single dental implant reconstruction in the esthetic zone, defined as teeth from the area of the upper right canine to the upper left canine
• if have filled in two questionnaires
• if answered an oral questionnaire
• if had intraoral photographs taken

You may not qualify if:

• if there was an edentulous area next to the implant to be studied

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Kristianstad University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Kristianstad University

Kristianstad, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (6)

• Gehrke P, Lobert M, Dhom G. Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score--rating soft tissue esthetics around single-implant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20(6):375-84; discussion 385. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00212.x.

  PMID: 19120783 BACKGROUND

• Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):140-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435.

  PMID: 19228100 BACKGROUND

• Thoma DS, Cosyn J, Fickl S, Jensen SS, Jung RE, Raghoebar GM, Rocchietta I, Roccuzzo M, Sanz M, Sanz-Sanchez I, Scarlat P, Schou S, Stefanini M, Strasding M, Bertl K; working group 2 of the 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021. Soft tissue management at implants: Summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Oct;32 Suppl 21(Suppl 21):174-180. doi: 10.1111/clr.13798.

  PMID: 34145925 BACKGROUND

• Altay MA, Sindel A, Tezerisener HA, Yildirimyan N, Ozarslan MM. Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes. Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Jan 7;5(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0153-3.

  PMID: 30613918 BACKGROUND

• Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Burgin W, Bragger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Apr;16(2):185-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01094.x.

  PMID: 15777328 BACKGROUND

• Stefanini M, Felice P, Mazzotti C, Mounssif I, Marzadori M, Zucchelli G. Esthetic evaluation and patient-centered outcomes in single-tooth implant rehabilitation in the esthetic area. Periodontol 2000. 2018 Jun;77(1):150-164. doi: 10.1111/prd.12215. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

  PMID: 29493024 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Treatment Adherence and Compliance; Health Behavior; Behavior

Study Officials

• Viveca Wallin Bengtsson, phD

  University of Kristianstad

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Prinicpal Investigator, phD

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 22, 2024
• First Posted: August 26, 2024
• Study Start: August 15, 2006
• Primary Completion: June 7, 2007
• Study Completion: June 7, 2007
• Last Updated: March 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

SE (1)