Prediction of Failure of Dental Implants
The Prediction of Failure Rate of Dental Implants
1 other identifier
observational
337
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to identify predictors in patient profiles and implant characteristics and to develop and calibrate a prediction model for failure of implants. Patients' demographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, general health, dental health, and implant characteristics were regarded as potential predictors. The failure of implants and the follow-up time in days of implants were considered the outcome. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis is used to find out the important risk factors for failure of dental implants and to develop the model for prediction of failure of dental implants at follow-up. The performance and clinical values of the model is determined.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 10, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 17, 2019
CompletedOctober 21, 2019
October 1, 2019
7 months
October 15, 2019
October 17, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Failure of dental implants
The failure of implants was defined as the presence of peri-implantitis, presence of mobility of implants, or removal of the implants for any reasons, for instance, unacceptable performance in aspects of function, tissue physiology, esthetics, and patients' satisfaction after placement of suprastructure.
up to 5 years follow-up
Follow-up time
The follow-up time is defined as the difference in time between implant placement and implant failure, or the date of the last follow-up time point if the dental implant is in an acceptable state.
up to 5 years follow-up
Study Arms (1)
Patients who underwent placement of dental implants
The study only includes one cohort. That is the patients who underwent placement of dental implants at baseline.
Interventions
All the included patients underwent the placement of at least one implant in either upper jaw, or lower jaw, or both.
Eligibility Criteria
The included patients were those who were referred to the Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, ACTA for placement of implant(s).
You may qualify if:
- patients were over 18 years old at baseline;
- patients underwent the placement of at least one implant;
- patients were followed up for the implants at least one time after placement of implants;
- patients provided their informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- patients were \<18 years old at baseline;
- patients were not followed up;
- patients did not provide the informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081LA, Netherlands
Related Publications (6)
Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:22-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x.
PMID: 23062125BACKGROUNDPjetursson BE, Asgeirsson AG, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:308-24. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.2.
PMID: 24660206BACKGROUNDJung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:2-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x.
PMID: 23062124BACKGROUNDKrebs M, Schmenger K, Neumann K, Weigl P, Moser W, Nentwig GH. Long-term evaluation of ANKYLOS(R) dental implants, part i: 20-year life table analysis of a longitudinal study of more than 12,500 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jan;17 Suppl 1:e275-86. doi: 10.1111/cid.12154. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
PMID: 24103113BACKGROUNDLekholm U, Grondahl K, Jemt T. Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(4):178-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00019.x.
PMID: 17100743BACKGROUNDOstman PO, Hellman M, Sennerby L. Ten years later. Results from a prospective single-centre clinical study on 121 oxidized (TiUnite) Branemark implants in 46 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):852-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00453.x. Epub 2012 May 29.
PMID: 22642261BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Geert van der Heijden, Prof. dr.
Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 15, 2019
First Posted
October 17, 2019
Study Start
December 10, 2018
Primary Completion
June 30, 2019
Study Completion
August 15, 2019
Last Updated
October 21, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Starting 6 months after the publication. The data will be available for 15 years after the end of the study.
- Access Criteria
- The data can be shared upon researchers' request via email (n.su@acta.nl). Naichuan Su will review the requests. The researchers need to share their protocols and guarantee that the data is only used for research purpose.
The participants' clinical data and data on demographic characteristics are possible to be shared. But those data can be only used for research purpose.