Evaluation of a Comprehensive School Health Programme in Zambia
1 other identifier
interventional
28,700
1 country
6
Brief Summary
In Zambia, the health and well-being of children aged 5 to 14 has often been overlooked, leading to various health challenges affecting their development and education. The Healthy Learners (HL) program, in collaboration with the Zambian Government, aims to address this gap by implementing a comprehensive school health program. Trained teachers, known as school health workers (SHWs), play a key role by delivering health education, coordinating preventative care with local clinics, and overseeing a 'school health room' for sick students. This study is a large cluster-randomized control trial in 225 schools. The goal of this trial is to compare the effects of the comprehensive school health programme (SHP) developed by HL against two alternatives: the current level of school health provision and the current school health activities enhanced with deworming and vitamin A coordination by HL, with their technical and financial support ensuring the reliable delivery of all health activities currently planned by the government.
- 1.What is the impact of the program on health-seeking, health, and education outcomes?
- 2.What are the indirect effects of the program on teachers and clinics?
- 3.What is the added value of such a comprehensive SHP, compared to (i) optimized (ii) or imperfect (status-quo) delivery of a limited range of school health activities (e.g., deworming and vitamin A supplements)?
- 4.How costly is the comprehensive SHP, and what factors affect its implementation?
- 5.What are the potential benefits of the program for long-term human capital accumulation (learning, well-being etc)?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2026
ExpectedAugust 4, 2026
July 1, 2026
2.4 years
August 12, 2024
July 31, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Any healthcare utilisation
The proportion of learners who sought formal care (any government health centre or hospital, or the school health room). Equals one if reported at least once during the health diary observation period.
Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Proportion of serious illness episodes where child sought healthcare
The investigators will calculate this as the proportion of "serious" illness episodes for which a child seeks care, at the child level. In other words, the number of serious illness episodes with care divided by the total number of serious illness episodes, for all children with at least one serious illness episode. A serious illness episode is one during which a child's ill-health symptoms are severe enough to require medical care, either immediately or the next day. This classification is based on WHO tools (c-IMCI and IMAI): Care is needed when (i) a child experiences any red-flag symptom (e.g. difficulty breathing, convulsions); (ii) has symptoms suggestive of certain conditions (e.g. measles, malaria); (iii) has experienced mild symptoms for a long time (coughing for 14 days, etc). During an illness episode, a child will be considered to seek medical care if they visit (i) the health room (treatment arm) or (ii) a government clinic or hospital (any arm).
Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Panel-based attendance rate
The program's effect on school attendance is assessed using data collected through repeated, unannounced spot checks at each school. The primary attendance measure will be based on the sample of children enrolled in the study at baseline and confirmed to still be enrolled in their original school at the time of the visit. In this sample, the attendance rate, measured at each attendance spot check, will be the proportion of those children confirmed present in class on the day of the visit.
Repeated measure captured at each of five unannounced attendance spot checks: term 1 2025, term 2 2025, term 3 2025, term 1 2026, and term 2 2026 (alongside endline), approximately 4-22 months after the start of the intervention (September 2024)
Register-based (cross-sectional) attendance
Additional measure of attendance, focusing on students in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7 at the time of the spot check. This register-based measure is defined as the proportion of children on the register who are present on the day of the spot check and confirmed by school staff as enrolled in the selected class on the visit day.
Repeated measure captured at each of four unannounced attendance spot checks: term 2 2025, term 3 2025, term 1 2026, and term 2 2026 (alongside endline), approximately 8-22 months after the start of the intervention (September 2024)
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Malaria prevalence (proportion of children testing positive for malaria)
Single biomarker measurement at the end of the child's diary round - term 1 (~March 2026; ~18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (~July 2026; ~22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Proportion of children with moderate or severe anaemia
Single biomarker measurement at the end of the child's diary round - term 1 (~March 2026; ~18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (~July 2026; ~22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Proportion of children with diarrhoea
Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Haematuria prevalence
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Recall over last 7 days.
Share of diary days with any reported symptom
Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (24)
Boys' menstrual health knowledge
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Boys' menstrual health stigma
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
School environment and belonging
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
- +21 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
School health programme (SHP)
EXPERIMENTALSHP developed by Healthy Learners (HL) in collaboration with the Ministry of Education (MOE), which follows the WHO guidelines on school health activities. HL supports the upgrading of basic sanitation facilities and construction of a dedicated 'health room' in the school; trains selected teachers to become school health workers (SHWs) who deliver health and sanitation education, coordinate deworming and vitamin A supplementation in the school, and assess sick learners in the school health room using a clinical decision support system (CDSS), either treating in school or referring to the local health centre. At the health centre, children referred by SHWs are given priority by health care workers who see them within 30 minutes of arriving at the facility. Schools also create student networks (a "buddy" system) whereby learners monitor each other's absence and coordinate with SHWs, who can then follow up with the household.
Deworming and vitamin A supplementation
ACTIVE COMPARATORHealthy Learners will enusre reliable delivery of the national deworming programme twice a year, during the same period as in the SHP arm, for comparability of the effect of prevention alone to the full SHP.
Status quo
NO INTERVENTIONSchools to operate as usual with no intervention other than the usual activities planned and organized by the government, as set out the 2006 School Health and Nutrition Policy, until the end of the trial.
Interventions
Combination intervention which consists of: * Upgrading sanitation facilities and constructing a 'health room' in the school * Health teacher training: 5-10 teachers per school are recruited and trained for two weeks to become School Health Workers (SHWs) by Healthy Learners * The SHWs: (1) deliver education on health and good sanitation and hygiene (2) coordinate with local clinics to deliver preventive care (e.g. school deworming and vitamin A supplementation); (3) assess sick students in the health room with a tablet-based clinical decision support system (CDSS); (4) treat sick students in the health room for some conditions (malaria, diarrhoea, schistosomiasis, pneumonia, conjunctivitis) or (5) refer to the health facility for treatment; (6) monitor absence of learners * Referral: learners referred by SHWs are given a referral form by the SHW, which contains information about symptoms and suggested diagnosis by the CDSS. The learners are prioritised in the local clinic.
Schools implement the government policy of distributing deworming drugs and vitamin A supplementation to learners twice a year. Additional support from Healthy Learners ensures reliable delivery.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Virginiacollaborator
- Healthy Learnerscollaborator
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID)collaborator
- Medical Research Councilcollaborator
- London School of Economics and Political Sciencelead
- University of Notre Damecollaborator
- University of Zambiacollaborator
Study Sites (6)
Chingola District Education Board
Chingola, Copperbelt, Zambia
Luanshya District Education Board
Luanshya, Copperbelt, Zambia
Masaiti District Education Board
Masaiti, Copperbelt, Zambia
Kawambwa District Education Board
Kawambwa, Luapula Province, Zambia
Mwense District Education Board
Mwense, Luapula Province, Zambia
Samfya District Education Board
Samfya, Luapula Province, Zambia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mylene Lagarde, PhD
London School of Economics and Political Science
- STUDY CHAIR
David Ross, PhD
University of Stellenbosch
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Blinding of intervention units, i.e. schools, to their own treatment (or that of others) is not feasible. After the initial scoping and baseline data collection (during which treatment was masked to all participants and assessors), due to the nature of the intervention, there will be no blinding: both the beneficiaries and assessors monitoring the outcomes will be able to infer whether the school is receiving the HL programme or not.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2024
First Posted
August 19, 2024
Study Start
February 27, 2024
Primary Completion
July 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Last Updated
August 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available permanently. They will become available along with the publication of the study in a journal, and investigators will provide a replication package as part of the publication.
The investigators will share a complete dataset at the individual-level containing all primary and secondary study outcomes, any other variables used in the analysis, and treatment assignments. Data will be anonymised to ensure no participants can be personally identified (directly or indirectly)