Pediatric Fiberglass Crown in Primary Teeth
Evaluation of the Clinical Success of Pediatric Fiberglass Crowns in Primary Teeth Using Different Luting Cements
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical success of fiberglass crowns applied to primary teeth and to assess the impact of two different luting cements on the success of the fiberglass crowns. The main questions to answer are:
- Will fiberglass crowns demonstrate sufficient clinical success to serve as a viable alternative to existing pediatric crowns?
- Will there be any differences in the clinical success and mechanical properties of fiberglass crowns based on the type of luting cement used? Thirty-eight children (60 teeth), between 5 and 9 years old (7.03±1.14), enrolled for the study. The researchers evaluated the clinical success of fiberglass crowns bonded with two different types of luting cement (1: FujiOne; 2: FujiCEM 2) based on retention, anatomical integrity, effect on periodontal health and parental satisfaction. Participants will:
- Visit the clinic 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months after cementatiton.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2024
CompletedAugust 19, 2024
August 1, 2024
1.4 years
August 14, 2024
August 15, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Crown success
Crown success was categorized as "successful" if no loss or fractures occurred and "unsuccessful" otherwise. Failed cases are classified as decementation, occlusal wear and fracture. Fracture classification includes large loss and chipped cases.
Evaluations were conducted at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Plaque Index
Evaluations were conducted at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months.
Gingival Index
Evaluations were conducted at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months.
Other Outcomes (1)
Parental Satisfaction with fiberglass crown restorations
Evaluations were conducted at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months.
Study Arms (2)
Device: Glass-ionomer cement
EXPERIMENTALThe capsule was attached to the mixer and mixed for 10 seconds. The cement was evenly distributed to the crowns paying attention that there were no air voids. Then crowns were placed by pressing them onto the prepared teeth with finger pressure. At least 2 minutes and 15 seconds after mixing, the excess cement was cleaned off. Following mixing, a minimum of 4 minutes and 30 seconds was allowed for the cement to set.
Device: Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement
EXPERIMENTALFujiCEM 2 (GC, Tokyo, Japan) was evenly distributed to the inner surface of the crown with the syringe and immediately placed onto the teeth with finger pressure. The crowns were placed on the prepared tooth. At least 2 minutes and 15 seconds after mixing, the excess cement was cleaned off. Following mixing, a minimum of 4 minutes and 30 seconds was allowed for the cement to set.
Interventions
After the caries were removed, the teeth were prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendations for Figaro Crowns. Fiberglass crowns (Figaro Crowns Inc., USA) of the most suitable size in terms of the mesio-distal dimension of the tooth were selected. Following the establishment of anesthesia, the teeth were prepared using diamond cutting burs with a high-speed, water-cooled turbine handpiece. In order to achieve adequate interocclusal space, an occlusal reduction of 1-2 mm was executed along with a proximal reduction reaching 1 mm below the gingival margin. A more conservative reduction was applied to the buccal and lingual surfaces. After preparation, any remaining decayed dentin tissue was removed using a steel round bur with a low-speed micromotor. To ensure occlusal harmony, diamond burs were used to perform abrasion on the crown edges, and the trimmed crown edges were polished using rubber aids before cementation.
Figaro crowns were placed on the prepared teeth with finger pressure, following the manufacturer's instructions for the luting cement to be used. For each cement, the recommended setting time was observed, and excess cement residues were removed accordingly.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- For participants:
- absence of any systemic disease
- absence of any periodontal disease
- no unilateral chewing habit
- a Frankl scale score of three-four
- For teeth:
- no percussion or palpation sensitivity
- no malocclusion
- no pathological mobility
- no pulpal treatment due to caries or other reasons
- had sound cervical margins
- not hypoplastic or hypocalcified
- had opposing functioning teeth
- had physiological root resorption not exceeding one-third of the root length
- had deep dentin caries with two or more surface that do not contain pulp involvement
You may not qualify if:
- did not attend their follow-up appointments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Akdeniz University
Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zulfikar Zahit Ciftci, Phd
Akdeniz University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The treatments and evaluations were conducted by different researchers. As a result, masking could be performed for both the investigators and the participants.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Principal Dentisty
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 14, 2024
First Posted
August 19, 2024
Study Start
June 15, 2020
Primary Completion
November 20, 2021
Study Completion
November 23, 2022
Last Updated
August 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08