NCT06558734

Brief Summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical success of fiberglass crowns applied to primary teeth and to assess the impact of two different luting cements on the success of the fiberglass crowns. The main questions to answer are:

  • Will fiberglass crowns demonstrate sufficient clinical success to serve as a viable alternative to existing pediatric crowns?
  • Will there be any differences in the clinical success and mechanical properties of fiberglass crowns based on the type of luting cement used? Thirty-eight children (60 teeth), between 5 and 9 years old (7.03±1.14), enrolled for the study. The researchers evaluated the clinical success of fiberglass crowns bonded with two different types of luting cement (1: FujiOne; 2: FujiCEM 2) based on retention, anatomical integrity, effect on periodontal health and parental satisfaction. Participants will:
  • Visit the clinic 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months after cementatiton.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
38

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2020

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 20, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 23, 2022

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 14, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 19, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 19, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

August 14, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 15, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Fiberglass crownGlass-ionomer cementResin-modified glass-ionomer cementPrimary molar teeth

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Crown success

    Crown success was categorized as "successful" if no loss or fractures occurred and "unsuccessful" otherwise. Failed cases are classified as decementation, occlusal wear and fracture. Fracture classification includes large loss and chipped cases.

    Evaluations were conducted at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Plaque Index

    Evaluations were conducted at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months.

  • Gingival Index

    Evaluations were conducted at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months.

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Parental Satisfaction with fiberglass crown restorations

    Evaluations were conducted at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months.

Study Arms (2)

Device: Glass-ionomer cement

EXPERIMENTAL

The capsule was attached to the mixer and mixed for 10 seconds. The cement was evenly distributed to the crowns paying attention that there were no air voids. Then crowns were placed by pressing them onto the prepared teeth with finger pressure. At least 2 minutes and 15 seconds after mixing, the excess cement was cleaned off. Following mixing, a minimum of 4 minutes and 30 seconds was allowed for the cement to set.

Procedure: Tooth PreperationProcedure: Cementation

Device: Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement

EXPERIMENTAL

FujiCEM 2 (GC, Tokyo, Japan) was evenly distributed to the inner surface of the crown with the syringe and immediately placed onto the teeth with finger pressure. The crowns were placed on the prepared tooth. At least 2 minutes and 15 seconds after mixing, the excess cement was cleaned off. Following mixing, a minimum of 4 minutes and 30 seconds was allowed for the cement to set.

Procedure: Tooth PreperationProcedure: Cementation

Interventions

After the caries were removed, the teeth were prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendations for Figaro Crowns. Fiberglass crowns (Figaro Crowns Inc., USA) of the most suitable size in terms of the mesio-distal dimension of the tooth were selected. Following the establishment of anesthesia, the teeth were prepared using diamond cutting burs with a high-speed, water-cooled turbine handpiece. In order to achieve adequate interocclusal space, an occlusal reduction of 1-2 mm was executed along with a proximal reduction reaching 1 mm below the gingival margin. A more conservative reduction was applied to the buccal and lingual surfaces. After preparation, any remaining decayed dentin tissue was removed using a steel round bur with a low-speed micromotor. To ensure occlusal harmony, diamond burs were used to perform abrasion on the crown edges, and the trimmed crown edges were polished using rubber aids before cementation.

Device: Glass-ionomer cementDevice: Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement
CementationPROCEDURE

Figaro crowns were placed on the prepared teeth with finger pressure, following the manufacturer's instructions for the luting cement to be used. For each cement, the recommended setting time was observed, and excess cement residues were removed accordingly.

Device: Glass-ionomer cementDevice: Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 9 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • For participants:
  • absence of any systemic disease
  • absence of any periodontal disease
  • no unilateral chewing habit
  • a Frankl scale score of three-four
  • For teeth:
  • no percussion or palpation sensitivity
  • no malocclusion
  • no pathological mobility
  • no pulpal treatment due to caries or other reasons
  • had sound cervical margins
  • not hypoplastic or hypocalcified
  • had opposing functioning teeth
  • had physiological root resorption not exceeding one-third of the root length
  • had deep dentin caries with two or more surface that do not contain pulp involvement

You may not qualify if:

  • did not attend their follow-up appointments

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Akdeniz University

Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental CariesDental Plaque

Interventions

Cementation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesDental Deposits

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative TechniquesDental BondingDentistry

Study Officials

  • Zulfikar Zahit Ciftci, Phd

    Akdeniz University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The treatments and evaluations were conducted by different researchers. As a result, masking could be performed for both the investigators and the participants.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Principal Dentisty

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2024

First Posted

August 19, 2024

Study Start

June 15, 2020

Primary Completion

November 20, 2021

Study Completion

November 23, 2022

Last Updated

August 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Locations