Comparative Effectiveness of Various Educational Approaches on Oral Hygiene
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Dental caries constitutes a major global public health challenge, posing substantial burdens on both oral health outcomes and healthcare systems worldwide, with far-reaching implications for prevention, treatment, and economic resources. Regular tooth brushing is recognized as the most effective preventive measure against dental caries. However, motivating children to adopt and maintain proper oral hygiene behaviors remains a significant challenge. This study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of traditional education methods and a mobile application in promoting oral hygiene habits among children. Methods: The study included 150 children who attended routine dental examinations. Parents completed a baseline questionnaire to assess their child's oral hygiene habits. Baseline clinical measurements were recorded, including dental caries indices (dft/DMFT, dfs/DMFS), dental plaque, and gingival index scores. Participants were randomly allocated into three groups: Group-1: received individualized oral hygiene instruction using a model and toothbrush; Group-2: received slide-based oral hygiene education; and Group-3: utilized the Brush DJ mobile application. After three months, follow-up assessments were conducted, including a repeated parental questionnaire, clinical evaluations, and a parental satisfaction survey. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 with chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and Fisher's Exact tests. Study Design: This prospective, randomized controlled study compared the effectiveness of traditional educational methods and a mobile application (Brush DJ) in promoting oral hygiene habits among 150 healthy children aged 5-12 years. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee (approval no.: 21-3.1T/49, date: March 18, 2021). Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all participating children. Study Population: Participants were recruited from routine dental examinations at Ege University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry. The sample size was determined through power analysis to ensure statistical significance. Inclusion criteria were children without systemic diseases, no ongoing orthodontic treatment, and willingness to participate. Children with special healthcare needs or those unwilling to participate were excluded. Baseline Assessments: At baseline, parents completed a structured questionnaire on their child's oral hygiene habits, including frequency and duration of tooth brushing, parental supervision, and fluoride toothpaste use. Clinical oral examinations were conducted under standardized conditions. The following indices were recorded: Dental caries indices: dft/DMFT and dfs/DMFS. Plaque Index (PI): To assess dental plaque presence. Gingival Index (GI): To evaluate gingival inflammation. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups using block randomization (block size: six): Group 1: Individualized oral hygiene instruction using a toothbrush and model (n=50). Group 2: Slide-based education via PowerPoint on a tablet or projector (n=50). Group 3: Use of the Brush DJ mobile application, incorporating gamification elements such as music, timers, and oral hygiene tips (n=50). Each intervention was delivered individually to children and their parents by a trained dental professional. Follow-Up Assessments: After three months, participants attended a recall visit, during which parents completed a follow-up questionnaire. Clinical examinations were repeated to reassess dft/DMFT, dfs/DMFS, plaque index, and gingival index scores. Parental Satisfaction Survey: Parents evaluated the educational interventions based on ease of use, engagement, and effectiveness in motivating their child. A four-question Likert-scale (1-5 points) parental satisfaction survey was administered. Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics were presented as means ± standard deviations for continuous variables and as frequencies/percentages for categorical variables. The chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Fisher's Exact test were used to assess differences between groups. A p-value of \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2025
CompletedApril 4, 2025
March 1, 2025
1 month
March 20, 2025
March 27, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Dental plaque index
After three months, participants returned for a recall visit. Clinical examinations were repeated to reassess the plaque index. Plaque index 0: No plaque is in the area adjacent to the gingiva. Plaque index 1: There is a plaque in the form of a thin film on the gingival margin. Plaque index 2: There is a visible plaque in the gingival pocket and gingival margin. Plaque index 3: There is a dense plaque in the gingival pocket and on the gingival margin.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Gingival index
3 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Oral hygiene motivation
3 months
Study Arms (3)
Individualized oral hygiene instruction using a toothbrush and model
EXPERIMENTALTraditional Method: Individualized oral hygiene instruction using a toothbrush and model (n=50).
Education through a slide-based PowerPoint presentation
EXPERIMENTALDigital Slide-Based Education: Education through a slide-based PowerPoint presentation (n=50).
Use of the Brush DJ mobile application
EXPERIMENTALMobile Application - Brush DJ: Use of the Brush DJ mobile application, which includes gamified elements such as music, timers, and oral hygiene tips to encourage brushing (n=50).
Interventions
Individualized demonstration of proper toothbrushing techniques using a toothbrush and a dental model. Conducted by a trained dental professional.
Educational session using a PowerPoint presentation on a tablet or projector. The session includes visual aids to explain proper brushing techniques, the importance of oral hygiene, and the effects of poor dental care.
Children use the Brush DJ app, which includes gamified elements such as music, timers, and oral hygiene tips to encourage proper brushing habits. The app provides reminders and engaging content to maintain motivation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- No systemic diseases No ongoing orthodontic treatment Patients and their parents willing to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Children with special healthcare needs Children who did not accept to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ege Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Ege University
Izmir, 35040, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the intervention, participants and the dental professional delivering the interventions were not blinded. However, the examiner (outcomes assessor) conducting clinical assessments was blinded to the intervention groups to minimize bias.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof.Dr.-Head of Pediatric Dentistry Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2025
First Posted
April 4, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion
July 1, 2024
Study Completion
October 1, 2024
Last Updated
April 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 20 March 2025-
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) collected during the study, including questionnaire responses, clinical indices (dft/DMFT, dfs/DMFS, Plaque Index, Gingival Index), and follow-up assessments, will be shared with other researchers upon request. Data Availability: The IPD will be made available after publication of the study results, for up to five years. Access Criteria: Researchers must submit a formal request outlining the purpose of the data use, and approval will be subject to ethical considerations and institutional guidelines. Data Sharing Mechanism: Data will be shared through a secure institutional repository or via direct communication with the principal investigator. Restrictions: Personally identifiable information will not be shared, and data use must comply with ethical and legal regulations governing research data privacy.